Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
What does the kicker do? |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 234 |
Author | |
sargesail ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 14 Jan 06 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1459 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 27 May 14 at 10:32pm |
Lot's of oversimplification in the diagrams. Because much of the force is applied to the mast through the sail, pulling 'downwards' (down the leech) on the upper mast.
|
|
![]() |
|
Medway Maniac ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 13 May 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 2788 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Indeed, a completely different situation on an unstayed rig. So far as I can see, on the RS300, if the boom is to rise then the mast has to bend below the gnav attachment point, but the leech tension should be maintained as the mast tip also moves forward. Likewise the EPS.
Using a conventional kicker on the EPS would have little effect on leech tension (might be a little softer even), but it would result in less rig movement, since the boom end wouldn't lift as much. Would be interesting to try it. Would also be interesting to know designer Yves Loday’s rationale in adopting a gnav; maybe just to avoid fouling the raised daggerboard? |
|
![]() |
|
iGRF ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 07 Mar 11 Location: Hythe Online Status: Offline Posts: 6499 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I imagine it was fashion rather than function in the case of the EPS, particularly since the 'lowers' act well below the upper impact point of the GNAV strut. It seemed to be the de rigeur device of choice about the time I came on the scene, almost every boat I've owned has one and it was only when they rigged the V2 with a proper kicker I got to see the difference, which was not the best option on the spaghetti RS700 mast we used. Why however do you feel a conventional kicker wouldn't tighten the leech? I did flirt with rear sheeting for a while which occasionally I'd like to revisit, I'm sure my windward work was better, but without an elastic band the downwind clew first stuff doesn't happen so easily in light air having all that warp off the boom end, you could almost do with some sort of variable system that could be changed on the fly. |
|
![]() |
|
Medway Maniac ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 13 May 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 2788 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I didn't anticipate that interpretation of my wording! What I meant was "using a conventional kicker instead of a gnav on the EPS would have little effect on leech tension". When I said "might be a little softer even", it was on account of the longer unsupported length of mast above the gooseneck implied by a conventional kicker compared to the length above the gnav attachment point; the longer the unsupported length, the greater the tip deflection for a given load. But as I said, it's hardly likely to make a huge difference, given that the change in length would be small.
Edited by Medway Maniac - 28 May 14 at 12:37pm |
|
![]() |
|
NickA ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 30 Mar 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 784 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The V3000 has the boom joined to the mast using a hole and pin arrangement (as do the Vago and RS500 tom name but two)
http://www.seldenmast.com/en/products/dinghies_only/booms/gnav_system/__lang_en.html
This is SO much better than the standard "square pin into the boom" of a traditional boat in that the boom can never come off the gooseneck. I wish we had the same arrangement on the Javelin on which the boom is only held on to the mast by the outhaul and kicker (which are not always tight). I guess a GNAV will work better on a boat with a low boom EG a musto skiff - though I think the boom is at deck level to maximise low down sail area rather than to maximise GNAV efficiency. Partly fashion, partly ergonomics, but evidently little difference in performance given by the variety of boats using the two systems: Vang: B14, RS800, RS700 Gnav: 49er, i14, Laser 4000, MPS, RS500 Interesting to note that the mast does bend in a different place under GNAV and VANG, pulling fullness out of the sail in a different place; so sails cut for one may not work their best with the other. (The V3000 sails were cut for a GNAV presumably). |
|
Javelin 558
Contender 2574 |
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 234 |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |