Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
Which rules says you cant hold the committe boat? |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <123 |
Author | ||||||
Brass ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 24 Mar 08 Location: Australia Online Status: Offline Posts: 1151 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 07 Dec 13 at 12:46am |
|||||
How could a boat be said to break rule 2 by doing something that is expressly permitted by rule 45?
Firstly, rule 45 makes it clear that a boat can be anchored, OR a boat can have her crew standing on the bottom. Having crew standing on the bottom (and, obviously, hanging onto the boat), is not being 'anchored'. Rule 23 applies to a boat that is anchored, but not to a boat that has a crew standing on the bottom (except for capsize or helping). Secondly, rule 23 is not a right of way rule: the obligation is to 'if possible ... avoid', not keep clear, and the other right of way rules in Section A are switched off (Preamble, Section D).
Rule 15 only applies to a boat that acquires right of way. For a boat with crew standing on the bottom, rule 23 will not apply and Section A right of way rules (P/S, W/L etc) will still be applying, and the crew jumping in the boat will not cause the boat to acquire or lose right of way, so the jumping in won't trigger rule 15. For a boat that is anchored, breaking the anchor out WILL switch rule 23 off, and switch the Section A right of way rules back on, so, depending on whether she is on Starboard, Leeward, etc the boat that was anchored may acquire right of way and a rule 15 limitation to give room to keep clear.
I don't think it would be a real practical problem. In this day and age, if conditions are so light or tide-bound that boats cannot manoeuvre properly in the starting area the RO should postpone or abandon the start until conditions are suitable for sailing. If you do choose to anchor or put your crew overside, then you will normally pick your moment to let go at a time when you won't get into trouble.
Yup, that seems pretty right. |
||||||
![]() |
||||||
gordon ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 07 Sep 04 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1037 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||||
Brass,
Could you explain which rules of Section A apply to a boat that is immobilised by the crew standing on the bottom? Could you explain why rule 23 applies to a boat immobilised by a piece of metal and a rope but not to a boat held by her crew standing on the bottom? |
||||||
Gordon
|
||||||
![]() |
||||||
JimC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6661 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||||
Must admit I've always inferred from RRS45 that the crew standing on the bottom counted as being anchored. That may not be a valid assumption of course. The reason for my inference is the rule heading being Hauling out, making fast and anchoring. Anchoring by standing on the bottom always seemed to me to be just another form of anchoring, which is permitted, as opposed to say tying on to a jetty, which isn't.
The situation I felt might be of dubious sporting status with respect to holding the boat whilst standing on the bottom would be if, with a dinghy, the crew held the boat fractionally short of the line in a close hauled position so as to occupy the ideal spot on the line, and then jumped in the boat during the last few seconds so as to obtain a perfect start. Naturally this is a situation that would rarely occur since very few starts are run in such shallow water that this would be practical. Very hard for the RRS to include wordings for really bizarre circumstances like that... Edited by JimC - 07 Dec 13 at 10:49am |
||||||
![]() |
||||||
Brass ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 24 Mar 08 Location: Australia Online Status: Offline Posts: 1151 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||||
I think all the same rules apply, in the same way that they do to a boat that is NOT immobilised by the crew standing on the bottom.
No I can't. You would need to ask the members of the ISAF Racing Rules Committee who drafted rules 45 and 23.
|
||||||
![]() |
||||||
gordon ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 07 Sep 04 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1037 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||||
An alternative - and in my opinion far more logical reading is that rule 23 applies to boats immobilised by their crew standing on the bottom.
The situation is common at some estuary venues - Maldon springs to mind - where racing starts as soon as there is deep enough water on the start line. The start is always against the current. Boats line up near the bank, with the crew in the water, then start to sail as late as possible. |
||||||
Gordon
|
||||||
![]() |
||||||
gordon ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 07 Sep 04 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1037 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||||
Let's explore the logic of Brass' opinion on rule 23.
If a boat is held by the crew he will usually do so by holding the bow. The boat will lie to the current or the wind. If to the wind then the boat will lie head to wind, yawing from side to side. In other word's it will be permanently subject to rule 13 and required to keep clear then. If the boat lies to the current and the current is not in line with the wind the boat may lie at an angle that is below close-hauled. Rule 13 will not apply, but 10, 11 and 12 may apply and in certain circumstances the boat will be required to keep clear. If in keeping clear the crew in the water does anything to contribute to propelling the boat then rule 42 has been broken. We are far from an application of the KISS principle, and are tying ourselves up in logical knots. If I heard a protest regarding this situation I would apply rule 23 and request confirmation, or on an International Jury, launch a Q&A. |
||||||
Gordon
|
||||||
![]() |
||||||
gordon ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 07 Sep 04 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1037 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||||
Following up on Brass's suggestion I have contacted one of those who drafts the rules...
They have no problem with applying rule 23 to a boat held by a crew member standing on the bottom. Such a boat is secured firmly in one position, in other words "anchored". As the verb "to anchor" is not defined in the racing rules then it is to be used in the sense ordinarily understood in nautical or general use. A dictionary definition gives the following: Full Definition of ANCHORtransitive verb 1: to hold in place in the water by an anchor <anchor a ship> 2: to secure firmly : fix <anchor a post in concrete> 3: to act or serve as an anchor for <it is she who is anchoring the rebuilding campaign — G. D. Boone> <anchoring the evening news> intransitive verb 1: to cast anchor 2: to become fixed |
||||||
Gordon
|
||||||
![]() |
||||||
alstorer ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 02 Aug 07 Location: Cambridge Online Status: Offline Posts: 2899 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||||
If they're crazy? going to have far more control over most boats holding it by the shroud chainplates (or similar position for an unstayed boat), sails free, at an angle to the wind.
|
||||||
-_
Al |
||||||
![]() |
||||||
gordon ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 07 Sep 04 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1037 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||||
and so much less strain on the back - especially in a currentor in any wind....
|
||||||
Gordon
|
||||||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <123 |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |