OCS rule? |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 12> |
Author | |
Sapspec8650 ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: 15 Jul 19 Online Status: Offline Posts: 15 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 23 Aug 21 at 11:50am |
I am given to believe that if you are caught OCS that you are entitled to all due consideration under the rules until (or when) you return to start correctly. Is there a specific rule that covers this?
|
|
![]() |
|
PeterG ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 12 Jan 08 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 822 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The short answer is no You are covered by the normal rules until you have turned back, but once turned you have to keep out of the way. There are additional complications for example with a black flag start, where you are simply disqualified.
|
|
Peter
Ex Cont 707 Ex Laser 189635 DY 59 |
|
![]() |
|
Sapspec8650 ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: 15 Jul 19 Online Status: Offline Posts: 15 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
So, PeterG to advance -
If I am OCS, but ignorant of that fact & carry on racing, if I luff an overtaking boat (legally) & there is contact and .... I finish the race (with no sound signal crossing the line) can I protest even if I had never been legally in the race? All hypothetical you understand! |
|
![]() |
|
Brass ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 24 Mar 08 Location: Australia Online Status: Offline Posts: 1151 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Case 1
Rule 60.1, Right to Protest; Right to Request Redress or Rule 69 Action Rule 63.1, Hearings: Requirement for a Hearing A boat that breaks a rule while racing but continues to race may protest over a later incident, even though after the race she is disqualified for her breach. |
|
![]() |
|
PeterG ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 12 Jan 08 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 822 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The rule says you have to give way when you are returning to the statrt line - to recross. So if you are unaware you were OCS and continue in the race normal rules apply.
|
|
Peter
Ex Cont 707 Ex Laser 189635 DY 59 |
|
![]() |
|
Brass ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 24 Mar 08 Location: Australia Online Status: Offline Posts: 1151 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Rule 21 and Case 1, like the RRS in general, take no notice of a boat's state of mind, awareness or intention. They just consider what boats actually do.
Sapspec: You certainly were 'in' the race. You were entered, you came to the starting area, you sailed about in the racing area intending to racd, and from your preparatory signal, you were 'racing' in accordance with the definition in the RRS.
|
|
![]() |
|
Sapspec8650 ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: 15 Jul 19 Online Status: Offline Posts: 15 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
PeterG & Brass - thank you for your contributions I shall share your knowledge!
|
|
![]() |
|
andymck ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() Joined: 15 Dec 06 Location: Stamford Online Status: Offline Posts: 397 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Although you may have also just admitted to a rule 14 breach as well.
The damage clause has been removed. SECTION B GENERAL LIMITATIONS 14 AVOIDING CONTACT A boat shall avoid contact with another boat if reasonably possible. However, a right-of-way boat, or one sailing within the room or mark-room to which she is entitled, need not act to avoid contact until it is clear that the other boat is not keeping clear or giving room or mark-room. |
|
Andy Mck
|
|
![]() |
|
Brass ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 24 Mar 08 Location: Australia Online Status: Offline Posts: 1151 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
C'mon Andymck,
Exoneration for no injury or damage is still there, it has been moved to rule 43.1(c) A right-of-way boat, or one sailing within the room or mark-room to which she is entitled, is exonerated for breaking rule 14 if the contact does not cause damage or injury. |
|
![]() |
|
andymck ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() Joined: 15 Dec 06 Location: Stamford Online Status: Offline Posts: 397 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Another rewrite to make it harder to understand
Having the exoneration in 14 was clearer. Interesting to see that some senior umpires have ignored 43.1at two events I have been at this year. Though what constitutes damage is a moot point anyway. A scuff? A scratch? A crunch? A hole? I would say all of those as I end up fixing them on our boats. |
|
Andy Mck
|
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 12> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |