Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
Laser 161752 Tynemouth |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
SNAKES! |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 45678 19> |
Author | ||||
Guests ![]() Guest Group ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 30 Jan 18 at 3:27pm |
|||
Most club have a swap system and fines. Then behind the scenes most I imagine have a certain amount of black market payments for carrying out duties. Seems the best way to handle it.
Actually setting up a market and putting a value on a duty so that it all works would be an administrative nightmare.
|
||||
![]() |
||||
turnturtle ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 05 Dec 14 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2538 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
Why the dichotomy - personally I wouldn’t mind topping up my pension with a stint on a committee boat- beats the sh*t out of pushing pallets of cement around at the builders merchant like I did as student
|
||||
![]() |
||||
Eisvogel ![]() Posting king ![]() ![]() Joined: 09 Dec 16 Location: Birmingham Online Status: Offline Posts: 135 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
Not sure about other clubs, but for the club I'm at that would be the end. It'd drive a dividing line through the membership into the 'first class' members, who pay more and just show up to sail, and the 'second class' members who do all the legwork and probably then don't even find the time to sail (or are too busy doing the duties that the others paid their way out of). And, tbh, I'd rather be the same among equals than on either side of such a divide. I'd rather have a smaller club full of active and committed members than a larger club where half the people treat the other half as their servants, just because they pay more. Because in the long run there'd be no-one left.
|
||||
Enterprise 20361 (Eisvogel), Laser 102727 (Halcyon), Laser 121986
|
||||
![]() |
||||
JohnJack ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() Joined: 12 Mar 13 Online Status: Offline Posts: 246 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
That's not really the issue. I have been playing with event data for the last two years to try and devise some sort of National League. The results so far are published here www.sailnation.co.uk. Thus far I only Have Helm and Crew, however I have the data for Clubs that the sailors have entered under too (where it has been supplied) Based on the sum of the top 3 results per club per event, the top 15 looks something like this 1. Grafham Water 2. Hayling Island 3. Burghfield 4. Stokes Bay 5. Netley 6. Datchet Water 7. Leigh & Lowton 8. Warsash 9. Draycote Water 10. Staunton Harold 11. Northampton 12. West Lancs 13. Parkstone 14. Delph 15. Rutland The problem is the data and behaviour of the sailors. The data is horrendously inaccurate and inconsistent, eg name spellings for example we have Pete Gray (of Scorpion fame) as Pete Gray, Peter Gray, Pete Grey, Peter Grey at different events, add to this where you have multiple people with the same name Scorpion sailor Andy McKee and N12 sailor Andy McKee for example (think we have two Steve Grahams (the P&B sailmaker and the Solo sailor) too as well as spelling mistakes it gets a bit nightmarish. Also we have results where a sailor has entered under two or three different clubs, happens allot when someone is also RNSA (Royal Navy Sailing Association). 4 is the record so far (for a single hander, someone had 4 clubs listed next to their name in the results). We also have entries where the club is recorded as just initials as well, this could relate easily to a handful of different clubs BSC for example Bolton,Budworth,Burwain,Burghfield I could go on and on LLSC is one that pops up a fair bit, there is a Leigh & Lowton up near Warrington and one down the the South West somewhere I think Edited by JohnJack - 30 Jan 18 at 2:18pm |
||||
![]() |
||||
turnturtle ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 05 Dec 14 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2538 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
We are in broad alignment Mike - especially around reducing fees or offering credit for those who are prepared to put more time in.
|
||||
![]() |
||||
Cirrus ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 29 Oct 15 Location: UK Online Status: Offline Posts: 590 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
TT - so your concern with re-statement of what should have been blindingly obvious is what exactly ?
If people don't like the current offering in relation to dinghy sailing clubs then they can do something else - or start their own related business. Somehow I doubt the latter. The sport will change and clubs need to adapt, reduce their costs where possible and obviously reduce in number through consolidation. If some members want to buy themselves out of duties there will no doubt be others who would be very happy to be paid .. or receive a worthwhile reduction in their own membership cost. Clubs really do need to grasp this latter point rather than simply taking the 'bonus' income and passing on added pressure for replacemenst onto those who already do their share. |
||||
![]() |
||||
turnturtle ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 05 Dec 14 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2538 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
which was precisely my original point...
Edited by turnturtle - 30 Jan 18 at 12:52pm |
||||
![]() |
||||
Cirrus ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 29 Oct 15 Location: UK Online Status: Offline Posts: 590 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
Clubs need to adapt and change - sure but in the end they always have. The sport will be smaller in the future and consolidation is likely - that is a given. Those that say they want 'commercial' club-like services will have to set up businesses themselves, stump up when others try or simply put up.
For all the rhetoric here the hypothetical commercial provider model are plainly non-investable on any scale for the foreseeable. |
||||
![]() |
||||
eric_c ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() Joined: 21 Jan 18 Online Status: Offline Posts: 382 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
I agree. I've been involved with a few different 'inter-club' things over the years, they often seem to breed resentment and apathy in the club that gets thrashed and people who don't make the team. The arguments about the best way to score an event where some clubs could field 10 boats and others only 5, when each clubs uses their own munged PY scale, can go on a long time. |
||||
![]() |
||||
JohnJack ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() Joined: 12 Mar 13 Online Status: Offline Posts: 246 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
The problem is, sailing isn't really a "club" sport. A club is really just a place to sail. Unlike other sports, which are possibly more team based where you would have First Team, Second Team and so on and so on sailing in crew boats tends to be because your are just good mates who sail together (for the most part).
|
||||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 45678 19> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |