New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: Sailing the wrong course
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Sailing the wrong course

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123
Author
Rupert View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 11 Aug 04
Location: Whitefriars sc
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 8956
Post Options Post Options   Quote Rupert Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Sailing the wrong course
    Posted: 16 Oct 09 at 3:35pm
Originally posted by gordon

Sounds like outside help to me. Probably acceptable in a friendly club race.

Gordon


I assumed this would be the rule, but as you say, in a club race, especially for the back of the fleet who are more likely to get it wrong, Maybe!) I can't see anyone minding.

Does the RYA arbitration scheme cover missing things like this? I'm thinking that taking someone aside and explaining what happened and why they won't get a result is a lot less heavy handed than protesting, and gets round the RO acting as God in handing out a DNF.
Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686
Back to Top
JimC View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 17 May 04
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6661
Post Options Post Options   Quote JimC Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 Oct 09 at 4:33pm
Originally posted by Rupert


Originally posted by gordon

Sounds like outside help to me. Probably acceptable in a friendly club race.Gordon
I assumed this would be the rule, but...


But surely 41(d) applies: unsolicted help from a disinterested party is not prohibited. Obviously an RC doesn't want to spit out the help too much, and needs to make *very* sure that they treat everyone exactly the same, but its not actually prohibited that I can see.
Back to Top
gordon View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 07 Sep 04
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1037
Post Options Post Options   Quote gordon Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 Oct 09 at 5:34pm
RYA 1998/1 states "when the race committee boat, gives all boats advice that does not favour any particular no boat breaks rule 41 and no boat is entitled to redress".

However in the case of a boat missing the start/finish gate on a lap being warned by the race committee, the race committee gives advice to one particular boat that favours that boat and no other. Imagine if, as a result of the race committees warning, that boat beat you in the race. Would you not feel entitled to redress?

Gordon
Gordon
Back to Top
JimC View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 17 May 04
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6661
Post Options Post Options   Quote JimC Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 Oct 09 at 5:58pm
Originally posted by gordon

...in the case of a boat missing the start/finish gate on a lap being warned by the race committee, the race committee gives advice to one particular boat that favours that boat and no other. Imagine if, as a result of the race committees warning, that boat beat you in the race. Would you not feel entitled to redress?


I'm not sure I'd get it though... Especially in a club racing situation. The question is whether its an improper action. Provided the other boat got the advice after it has passed the mark and has to go back I'd have trouble saying it was. Its common enough in club racing to yell out if a fellow competitor has missed a mark, but naturally one normally waits until they have got a reasonable distance along the next leg before telling them. The art of course is to tell them late enough that you retain a nice advantage, but early enough that they will continue racing, not retire [grin]*.

If in a club racing situation the RC puts in a similar wait then no big deal.

I note that the RYA guidance note you quote is silent on that: it states that saying they are going to go wrong is an improper action, but makes no comment on telling them they have gone wrong so that they have to go back...

*now I think about it there's a subtlety there. Should the series be using a high points system that gives more points the more finishers there are then another competitor would not be a disinterested party in that case... I'm not sure such a system is often used though.

Edited by JimC
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.665y
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz
Change your personal settings, or read our privacy policy