Laser Hull Weight |
Post Reply
|
Page <1234> |
| Author | |
Guest
Newbie
Joined: 21 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 0 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Topic: Laser Hull WeightPosted: 09 Nov 07 at 6:55pm |
|
Can this be true? |
|
![]() |
|
Inland sea
Far too distracted from work
Joined: 19 Jul 07 Location: Rugby Online Status: Offline Posts: 290 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 09 Nov 07 at 7:07pm |
|
Yes it can. so if your buying a new one make sure you know the weight.
I can remember carrying them around upright when we needed to get a Black magic out ( allways seemed to be at the back for some reason?) and you could tell a heavy one very easily. The guy that selected the decks and hulls used to like a pint on Thursday so it was not uncommon for a super light or very heavy one to come out on Thursdays which is why as a moth sailor then I used to giggle to myself that the weight varince was 25% of my total hull weight ![]() I'm sure this sort of thing goes on in just about any factory. Anybody else out there have experience? |
|
|
RS300 426 18' SkiffTango Musto 051
B14 644 |
|
![]() |
|
m_liddell
Really should get out more
Joined: 27 May 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 583 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 09 Nov 07 at 7:33pm |
|
The weight of the boats at sailing centres on the med (neilson, sunsail etc.) vary wildly because laser send out all failed QC hulls out there at cut price since they will by wreaked by guests/UV/sand anyway.
I remember someone from the 3k CA saying they got hold of docs from laser on the 3k which included a scary allowable variation in build. Edited by m_liddell |
|
![]() |
|
Scooby_simon
Really should get out more
Joined: 02 Apr 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 2415 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 09 Nov 07 at 7:35pm |
|
Feckin hell, that's unreal. I'd be peeved if there was a 1% variation on a one design hull, but 10kg is crazy (if it's true).
|
|
|
Wanna learn to Ski - PM me..
|
|
![]() |
|
29er310
Posting king
Joined: 17 Apr 07 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 174 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 09 Nov 07 at 7:52pm |
|
I have always said that my laser was very heavy, now I know why!
|
|
![]() |
|
getafix
Really should get out more
Joined: 28 Mar 06 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 2143 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 10 Nov 07 at 8:13am |
|
I know there was similar variance (i.e. 5-10kg) between the SMODs chucked out for Topper in the White Formula ISO, Blaze, Buzz, Spice, Boss etc... days and it wouldn't be overly suprising to find similar variance between RS boards, particularly from those produced in the very busy days of RS200/400 production some years back - GRP/FRP production by hand just can't be that tightly controlled....
.....what you've got to hope for is that some quality control is imposed in the factory to weed out the very heavy hull/deck combos before they exit the back doors = you certainly don't normally get a chance to weigh your new (SMOD) boat when taking delivery but I know a few who have and one who even returned the boat to the builder, only to find they just sold it to someone else! |
|
|
Feeling sorry for vegans since it became the latest fad to claim you are one
|
|
![]() |
|
Lukepiewalker
Really should get out more
Joined: 24 May 06 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1341 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 10 Nov 07 at 8:26am |
|
If it's within tolerances (wide though they may be) I don't see why they wouldn't resell it. It could be worth asking if you can take a set of bathroom scales and choose one.I have heard suggestion of people testing the stiffness of a few hulls before choosing.
|
|
![]() |
|
blaze720
Really should get out more
Joined: 28 Sep 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1635 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 10 Nov 07 at 10:22am |
|
production by hand just can't be that tightly controlled....
Lots of issues there. In fact good control can be imposed. It is common to weight deck and hull mouldings and 'match' them to reduce the end product variance. And if things are well run to actually reject mouldings that fall outside of a controlled range in the first place. We've done it in the last year when needed, it's not something we want to do obviously but if you need to do it etc ... The key is to have realistic minimum weight limits and have a build that allows you to actually get to it or slightly below without a struggle. Then ALL boats can be bought up to the minimum plus say 0.5kg. We are switching to epoxy for Blaze production with Rondar as well as making some other engineering and deck tooling changes for 2008 - NOT to reduce typical weight but we are doing it to ensure we can follow the above approach reliably. Our epoxy boats will be no lighter than our 2007 polyester ones - intentionally. I should say the vast majority of the previous White Formula built Blazes were well constructed and the range in in terms of weight was low. The Blaze was always foamed and vacuum bagged from day one and older boats regularly prove their full competitiveness today. A good old one well sorted and with a decent sail is the equal of any other Blaze - see how few used ones are ever available ! We simply want to build our boats to a tighter target weight and faster than is possible with polyester and to meet growing demand efficiently. Owners do want the assurance that they are getting a fully competitive boat, down to weight and as light as the next one. It is daft that anyone should have to consider examining multiple hulls to get a 'good' one. It is easier to build accurately to a target weight in epoxy but there is a price premium, otherwise all boats would, I think, be built in epoxy . Many however hype epoxy too much - it's a great material for racing boats, very strong, easier to predict finished weight and is highly durable over the long term. However foam sandwiched and vacuumed bagged polyester can be extremely good as well, racing competitiveness can still be very long (eg Tasar) and many will argue that it is even better than epoxy in some uses. However it is more difficult to be consistent with polyester as opposed to epoxy in relation to eventual weight, that is down to basic characteristics of the material and the chemical processes involved ... and yes the approach of the builder. Blaze720 (aka Cirrus Raceboats) |
|
![]() |
|
chrisg
Really should get out more
Joined: 23 Mar 07 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 893 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 10 Nov 07 at 10:42am |
Hate to say this but we measured all of the 300's at our club (Draycote) and the mast rakes on them were all different. With one of the biggest fleets in the Uk (8 now regularly racing) our sample ranges from oldish boats 310's up to newest 500's. Can't quite remember the differences but it was measured in inches i think not mm's. Inland Sea may have had it written down somewhere. |
|
![]() |
|
radixon
Really should get out more
Joined: 27 Oct 06 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 2407 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 10 Nov 07 at 11:03am |
|
Now I know why I don;t do very well in Laser Races, I have a heavy boat!!! Right time to get the weigh scales out!
|
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
Page <1234> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |