PY changes for 2014 |
Post Reply
|
Page <1 1718192021 27> |
| Author | |||
tgruitt
Really should get out more
Joined: 02 Dec 04 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2479 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Topic: PY changes for 2014Posted: 28 Feb 14 at 11:18am |
||
Are you being serious? That's the biggest load of crap I've ever heard |
|||
|
Needs to sail more...
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Blue One
Far too distracted from work
Joined: 09 Nov 13 Online Status: Offline Posts: 317 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 Feb 14 at 11:20am |
||
+ 2
|
|||
![]() |
|||
iGRF
Really should get out more
Joined: 07 Mar 11 Location: Hythe Online Status: Offline Posts: 6499 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 Feb 14 at 11:23am |
||
That is not what I'm proposing, I'm saying ignore skewed data and if so reach for hard facts. Measure and bloody well trial them if you have to, but denying access to the market for a boat like the Icon is wrong, for whatever reason inaccurately suggesting another boat is faster for whatever reason is wrong, I'm even wondering if the sale of goods act could be used here, maybe if the RYA had to test the system in law, they'd take more time to be sure it worked better. The problem is you'd have to sue the supplier, it would be a question of wether they could join the RYA in that action. Tough one, I'm glad I don't make boats and have to market them in the face of this nonsense. |
|||
![]() |
|||
Noah
Really should get out more
Joined: 29 Dec 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 611 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 Feb 14 at 11:23am |
||
|
Just because the designer intended it to be slower, doesn't necessarily make it so. (I have suspicion, for example, that Icon has turned out faster than Mike ever hoped it would.) I would imagine that an Alto would slaughter a 5o on an RTC course where you can use the assym, but the monster kite stays in the chute except on the DDW leg. If you are shipping water over the lee side then you need to sail it flatter - don't blame the boat, or the PY. Hell - I can keep up with a 5o in my Furball if he can't use his kite on the reaches & I can! (For the first lap, at least
). |
|||
|
Nick
D-Zero 316 |
|||
![]() |
|||
iGRF
Really should get out more
Joined: 07 Mar 11 Location: Hythe Online Status: Offline Posts: 6499 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 Feb 14 at 11:26am |
||
Mate you're living in a world where coppers sue the complainant if they trip up a kerb, you don't think having spent seven or eight grand for a product that has certain definitions, turns out suddenly not to have them, there isn't a case to answer? |
|||
![]() |
|||
Medway Maniac
Really should get out more
Joined: 13 May 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 2788 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 Feb 14 at 11:32am |
||
+3, and I'm giving up feeding the troll.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
iGRF
Really should get out more
Joined: 07 Mar 11 Location: Hythe Online Status: Offline Posts: 6499 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 Feb 14 at 11:33am |
||
You would imagine? That's the difference, I have physical experience backing my words, then backing that opinion is the cold hard facts of sail area, jib size, kite size, 7 years observation, then in the case of the Icon detailed research prior to a project that unfortunately had to be cancelled due to illness, and racing experiences against the boat, so in these two instances more facts than most. |
|||
![]() |
|||
yellowwelly
Really should get out more
Joined: 24 May 13 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2003 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 Feb 14 at 11:34am |
||
|
technically- the manufacturer hasn't set the PN, even if they have recommended something to the customer/public domain.
I don't think there's a legal precedent where through the ethical and empirically accurate course of its activities, a third party, in this case the RYA, can held accountable for the potential loss of revenues of a product manufacturer or trading company utilising that third party's IP to assist with its sales. I think the best you can achieve from a hypothetical legal wrangling is finally convince manufacturers to STFU when it comes to announcing a predicted PN. I feel for Mike on this... damned if he does, damned if he doesn't, but legal chatter ain't going to help anyone.
Edited by yellowwelly - 28 Feb 14 at 11:37am |
|||
![]() |
|||
iGRF
Really should get out more
Joined: 07 Mar 11 Location: Hythe Online Status: Offline Posts: 6499 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 Feb 14 at 11:35am |
||
If you're not interested who even cares/ Go post on some redneck website comparing trailer parks..
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Rupert
Really should get out more
Joined: 11 Aug 04 Location: Whitefriars sc Online Status: Offline Posts: 8956 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 Feb 14 at 11:39am |
||
|
No, I think GRF is right. It has turned out from the figures the RYA have published this year that my Lightning is in fact approximately 1/2% slower than I thought it was. As I bought it thinking it was one speed, based on what the RYA said, and they have now changed their minds, based on nothing but statistics, I think I am going to sue them for their deception, as I'm obviously going to get less enjoyment from my boat, now I know it is slower.
|
|||
|
Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Post Reply
|
Page <1 1718192021 27> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |