Laser 161752 Tynemouth |
![]() |
Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
SNAKES! |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 1213141516 19> |
Author | |||
Cirrus ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 29 Oct 15 Location: UK Online Status: Offline Posts: 590 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 30 Jan 18 at 1:44pm |
||
TT - so your concern with re-statement of what should have been blindingly obvious is what exactly ?
If people don't like the current offering in relation to dinghy sailing clubs then they can do something else - or start their own related business. Somehow I doubt the latter. The sport will change and clubs need to adapt, reduce their costs where possible and obviously reduce in number through consolidation. If some members want to buy themselves out of duties there will no doubt be others who would be very happy to be paid .. or receive a worthwhile reduction in their own membership cost. Clubs really do need to grasp this latter point rather than simply taking the 'bonus' income and passing on added pressure for replacemenst onto those who already do their share. |
|||
![]() |
|||
turnturtle ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 05 Dec 14 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2538 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
We are in broad alignment Mike - especially around reducing fees or offering credit for those who are prepared to put more time in.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
JohnJack ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() Joined: 12 Mar 13 Online Status: Offline Posts: 246 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
That's not really the issue. I have been playing with event data for the last two years to try and devise some sort of National League. The results so far are published here www.sailnation.co.uk. Thus far I only Have Helm and Crew, however I have the data for Clubs that the sailors have entered under too (where it has been supplied) Based on the sum of the top 3 results per club per event, the top 15 looks something like this 1. Grafham Water 2. Hayling Island 3. Burghfield 4. Stokes Bay 5. Netley 6. Datchet Water 7. Leigh & Lowton 8. Warsash 9. Draycote Water 10. Staunton Harold 11. Northampton 12. West Lancs 13. Parkstone 14. Delph 15. Rutland The problem is the data and behaviour of the sailors. The data is horrendously inaccurate and inconsistent, eg name spellings for example we have Pete Gray (of Scorpion fame) as Pete Gray, Peter Gray, Pete Grey, Peter Grey at different events, add to this where you have multiple people with the same name Scorpion sailor Andy McKee and N12 sailor Andy McKee for example (think we have two Steve Grahams (the P&B sailmaker and the Solo sailor) too as well as spelling mistakes it gets a bit nightmarish. Also we have results where a sailor has entered under two or three different clubs, happens allot when someone is also RNSA (Royal Navy Sailing Association). 4 is the record so far (for a single hander, someone had 4 clubs listed next to their name in the results). We also have entries where the club is recorded as just initials as well, this could relate easily to a handful of different clubs BSC for example Bolton,Budworth,Burwain,Burghfield I could go on and on LLSC is one that pops up a fair bit, there is a Leigh & Lowton up near Warrington and one down the the South West somewhere I think Edited by JohnJack - 30 Jan 18 at 2:18pm |
|||
![]() |
|||
Eisvogel ![]() Posting king ![]() ![]() Joined: 09 Dec 16 Location: Birmingham Online Status: Offline Posts: 135 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Not sure about other clubs, but for the club I'm at that would be the end. It'd drive a dividing line through the membership into the 'first class' members, who pay more and just show up to sail, and the 'second class' members who do all the legwork and probably then don't even find the time to sail (or are too busy doing the duties that the others paid their way out of). And, tbh, I'd rather be the same among equals than on either side of such a divide. I'd rather have a smaller club full of active and committed members than a larger club where half the people treat the other half as their servants, just because they pay more. Because in the long run there'd be no-one left.
|
|||
Enterprise 20361 (Eisvogel), Laser 102727 (Halcyon), Laser 121986
|
|||
![]() |
|||
turnturtle ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 05 Dec 14 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2538 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Why the dichotomy - personally I wouldn’t mind topping up my pension with a stint on a committee boat- beats the sh*t out of pushing pallets of cement around at the builders merchant like I did as student
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Guests ![]() Guest Group ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Most club have a swap system and fines. Then behind the scenes most I imagine have a certain amount of black market payments for carrying out duties. Seems the best way to handle it.
Actually setting up a market and putting a value on a duty so that it all works would be an administrative nightmare.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Cirrus ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 29 Oct 15 Location: UK Online Status: Offline Posts: 590 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
A fair proportion of club members may be prepared to regularly do an extra duty or two for a discount off next years fees.... Many clubs already accomodate the 'time poor / cash rich' by offering them a form of 'buy-out' as well.
Couple the two together and just maybe you get the best of both worlds .. those on a tight budget and with more time available get to sail/race when otherwise it might be tough for them to justify the cost... and those with a higher income but little time to spare already have some much needed flexibility. They would effectively pay for the system in monetary terms. Very simple indeed to administer. If say the 'time poor' are already buying themselves out of say 3 duties per year for maybe £ 100 - 'pay' those with extra time to spare £ 30 off next years club subscription per extra duty (and the club even gets to keep a bit !!) Surely you record people turning up - or not - for duties already ? Flexible fees and a flexible approach to duties' allow more people to get into sailing - and then might perhaps keep them there longer. |
|||
![]() |
|||
turnturtle ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 05 Dec 14 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2538 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Well said!
|
|||
![]() |
|||
423zero ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 08 Jan 15 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 3420 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Perhaps a part time job for a student ? Most Cities and Large towns have a University of some description, what is minimum wage ?
|
|||
![]() |
|||
fab100 ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 15 Mar 11 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1005 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Interesting effort. Grafham ought to be at the top when at least 11 of your 31 events were held there of course. I'd say the sanity check is that Nick Craig and Toby Lewis should probably be top (or bloody close) of your list for helm and crew respectively. Until then, you've got a lot more data to crunch, perhaps the other 98% or 99%. I'm cool with the CHIPS scoring, but is every class of equal standard, even with the same number of entries? Hitting the top 10 in say the Moths or Merlins, against a load of Olympians, pros, jockeys and other assorted rockstars is gonna be harder than some other classes surely
Edited by fab100 - 30 Jan 18 at 6:41pm |
|||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 1213141516 19> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |