Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
International 14 Worlds |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 3456> |
Author | |
Guest ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: 21 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 21 Feb 05 at 11:09am |
There are two threads running on this see the other ... http://www.yachtsandyachting.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4 66&PN=1 Perhaps we could get these threads merged ... moderator please ... |
|
![]() |
|
Stefan Lloyd ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 03 Aug 04 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1599 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
There is an interesting story on this on The Daily Sail with long quotes from both Barker and Bell, the chairman of the jury. Since it is a subscription site, I suppose I had better not quote verbatim. Bell says Barker needed to push Irwin/Perry down to 26th to benefit and would have needed to slow them by 8 minutes to do so. Their tactics slowed them by 3 minutes and there was no chance they could have slowed them by 8. Therefore it was team racing. Barker says they pushed Irwin/Perry to the left hand of the course, which along with most of the fleet they expected to be non-favoured. As it turned out, it was the way to go. If the shift had not favoured the left hand side, they say they might have got them to 26th and gained 2nd place in the series for themselves. I think Barker makes a more plausible case that is was not team racing than the protest report gives them credit for. However if team racing tactics became common in fleet racing, it would ruin the sport. Therefore I think that given that GBR1516's tactics were, at best, open to question, the jury did the right thing.
|
|
![]() |
|
Blobby ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 07 May 04 Location: Australia Online Status: Offline Posts: 779 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In which case are you saying they are guilty of nothing but failing to sail the aussies far enough down the fleet to be of benefit to themselves?? Either way it appears clear that they tried to operate as a team and the rules have been successfully applied to demonstrate that this behaviour is unacceptable. End of Story. |
|
![]() |
|
Scooby_simon ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 02 Apr 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 2415 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
So if only one discard, could it be seen that GBR1516 could have gone up the leader board if they had forced AUS631 bleow 28th ? I have a feeling this one will run and run till we can get some first hand accounts...... |
|
Wanna learn to Ski - PM me..
|
|
![]() |
|
Stefan Lloyd ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 03 Aug 04 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1599 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
It does seem as though something like the "professional foul" has come to a major sailing event, and that if the need to show a return on their sponsor's money hadn't been involved, the incident may not have happened. |
|
![]() |
|
Ralph T ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: 20 Feb 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 36 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
If you have not read the links please do, the reports are so enlightening! What price the RYA Charter when the pressures of performance to gain sponsorship and RYA funding require our top sailors to resort to such depths |
|
![]() |
|
Stefan Lloyd ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 03 Aug 04 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1599 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Discard 1 by the look of it. The way I read it, that is implicit in the protest committee's report. Also the NOR http://www.takapunaboating.org.nz/SMLogo/Int%2014%20NoR.doc doesn't say anything special about discard, and the default arrangement in RRS Appendix A is one discard. The SIs don't seem to be on the website. Personally I think GBR1516 was lucky to avoid a rule 69 protest. |
|
![]() |
|
Phil eltringham ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 16 Mar 04 Location: England/Hitchin Online Status: Offline Posts: 1105 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
By the looks of it i think the RMW boys could have been a bit more subtle about it. Simply follow the aussies round the whole course slowing them a little at a time instead of doing it all in one hit at the end, where their influence could easilly be quantified. Harder to do, but 'safer' from their point of view.
|
|
FLAT IS FAST!
Shifts Happen |
|
![]() |
|
Scooby_simon ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 02 Apr 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 2415 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
was the series 7 races, discard 2 ? (or discard 1) If discard only one then does this not apply : As AUS631 is discarding a 27, if they could be sailed down to 29th they would need to count it and then be down the pan ?
And if so was not GBR1516 valid in trying this (all-be-it too late as it was probably (rightly?) seen as an attempt to help GBR1513). Any one know how many discards were available ? Sure I am missing something here ? |
|
Wanna learn to Ski - PM me..
|
|
![]() |
|
Ralph T ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: 20 Feb 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 36 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Can't believe that anyone could disagree with the Protest Committee. Pretty obvious what was happeneing when Alistair 'sailed back' from 150 mtres ahead Thought it might have been rule 2 & good to see that it is being implemented Thanks for the info Harry |
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 3456> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |