protest!!! |
Post Reply
|
Page 12> |
| Author | ||
tmoore
Really should get out more
Joined: 01 Nov 07 Location: Wales Online Status: Offline Posts: 880 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Topic: protest!!!Posted: 29 Jun 08 at 5:03pm |
|
|
during the 12hour junior race i was at this weekend there was a protest. one boat (port tack) was sailed by an experienced team racer who said he knew he was clearing the starboard boat but wanted to play it safe so tacked instead (on to starboard). the starboard boat thought otherwise and tacked calling to port calling protest neither boats took a penalty. startboard boat protested with a family member as witness (said he could see a gap between the bow and transom) (from other side of the lake). port tack boat used crew as witness. what would you do if you were on the protest comittee? (im not saying which boat we were at the moment) regards tom |
||
|
Landlocked in Africa
RS300 - 410 Firefly F517 - Nutshell Micro Magic RC yacht - Eclipse |
||
![]() |
||
JimC
Really should get out more
Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 29 Jun 08 at 7:31pm |
|
|
I don't think I'd care to call that one without having heard all the evidence...
|
||
![]() |
||
Villan
Really should get out more
Joined: 26 Nov 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1768 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 29 Jun 08 at 7:40pm |
|
|
Did either boat do turns?
You could both be disqualified if not ... Or thats my understanding of the rules? |
||
|
Vareo - 149 "Secrets"
TandyUK Servers |
||
![]() |
||
Worthy
Really should get out more
Joined: 07 Dec 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 511 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 29 Jun 08 at 7:48pm |
|
Only if there was a collision. |
||
![]() |
||
tmoore
Really should get out more
Joined: 01 Nov 07 Location: Wales Online Status: Offline Posts: 880 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 29 Jun 08 at 8:30pm |
|
|
what other evidence would you like? at a different point in the race i was on port and was clearing a starboard tack boat who bore away for no reason. a different boat shouted protest, is that allowed or does it have to be one of the boats involved? later up the beat we passed the same boat again (20 metres ahead this time |
||
|
Landlocked in Africa
RS300 - 410 Firefly F517 - Nutshell Micro Magic RC yacht - Eclipse |
||
![]() |
||
JimC
Really should get out more
Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 29 Jun 08 at 10:30pm |
|
You misunderstand: its so much a he said/she said that the only way I'd want to offer an opinion is if I'd actually listened to the witnesses. And yes, any boat that sees a rule breach may protest. Edited by JimC |
||
![]() |
||
Lukepiewalker
Really should get out more
Joined: 24 May 06 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1341 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 29 Jun 08 at 11:27pm |
|
|
And I think you gave away which boat you were....
|
||
|
Ex-Finn GBR533 "Pie Hard"
Ex-National 12 3253 "Seawitch" Ex-National 12 2961 "Curved Air" Ex-Mirror 59096 "Voodoo Chile" |
||
![]() |
||
tmoore
Really should get out more
Joined: 01 Nov 07 Location: Wales Online Status: Offline Posts: 880 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 30 Jun 08 at 10:21am |
|
|
thats the way i saw it, that without a proper witness (unbiased) it would be unreasonable to come to a conclusion. we lost the protest and it put us down 2laps and we ended up 8th instead of pushing for the 3rd we were looking at |
||
|
Landlocked in Africa
RS300 - 410 Firefly F517 - Nutshell Micro Magic RC yacht - Eclipse |
||
![]() |
||
JimC
Really should get out more
Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 30 Jun 08 at 11:18am |
|
|
It may be quite reasnable to come to a conclusion without a neutral witness. It frequently has to be done. The PC listens to all the different stories and works out a sequence of events which best fits. That's the facts found. From the facts found they then apply the appropriate rules.
|
||
![]() |
||
Spyderman
Newbie
Joined: 27 Feb 08 Location: Netherlands Online Status: Offline Posts: 39 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 30 Jun 08 at 3:11pm |
|
|
In a Port - Starboard Protest, the PC should apply the principles from Case 50 in the Casebook:
ISAF CASE 50 When a protest committee finds that in a port-starboard incident S did not change course and that there was not a genuine and reasonable apprehension of collision on the part of S, it should dismiss her protest. When the committee finds that S did change course and that there was reasonable doubt that P could have crossed head of S if S had not changed course, then P should be disqualified. In your original question Port stated "playing it safe" which in my opinion, translates into a reasonable apprehension of collision by Starboard. So Port was not keeping clear. Port has to convince the PC that she was keeping clear and Starboard's change of course was unnecessary. |
||
|
Are you interested in the Racing Rules of Sailing? Go to: http://rrsstudy.blogspot.com
|
||
![]() |
||
Post Reply
|
Page 12> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |