Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
Race rules advice pls |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1234 9> |
Author | |||
boatshed ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() Joined: 12 Apr 05 Online Status: Offline Posts: 457 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 17 May 23 at 1:13pm |
||
Thanks for your explanation. Thinking of rule 11 and pre start ( windward boat keeps clear) . What happens if the leeward boat sailing a little higher gains an overlap from behind but the windward boat takes no action to keep clear until the boats are close together and then “time and opportunity” is the defence by the windward boat? Is the leeward boat in wrong? |
|||
Steve
|
|||
![]() |
|||
JimC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
The rules don't require you to guess what another boat might do differently. They do require you to be aware of what its currently doing. So you do need to allow for a right of way boat continuing on the same course and speed. You don't need to anticipate it suddenly changing direction for no obvious reason.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
boatshed ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() Joined: 12 Apr 05 Online Status: Offline Posts: 457 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Really? When you are in a race, there’s no requirement to anticipate colliding with another boat? More specifically, there is no requirement for a give way boat to anticipate having to keep clear of a right of way boat? Is that right? Edited by boatshed - 17 May 23 at 10:04am |
|||
Steve
|
|||
![]() |
|||
CT249 ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() Joined: 08 Jul 06 Online Status: Offline Posts: 399 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
It's actually a major problem at times in big boats; for example years ago the world IOR maxi champ had a 3/4 tonner bob upright in its wind shadow as they crossed tacks. About 35 tonnes of 82' IOR boat went charging upwind at a rate of knots with its main boom topping lift wrapped around the masthead of the 3/4 tonner, dragging it sideways on its ear. At least there was no lasting damage, whereas at other times little boats popping upright have shoved their mastheads through the expensive big-boat sails. Serves the big bullies right!
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Sussex Lad ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() Joined: 08 Jun 18 Online Status: Offline Posts: 360 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Yes, very true. Bearing in mind the vaguaries of the ******** system anyway, a regular club race really doesn't warrant an OCD approach to rules. A few basics and a fair minded approach. |
|||
![]() |
|||
423zero ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 08 Jan 15 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 3420 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Never thought about wind shadow, hiked out in strong wind and a complete drop in wind, that is quite amusing when you think about it.
|
|||
Robert
|
|||
![]() |
|||
JimC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Agree with Noah. If S took avoiding action Port is in the wrong. If S was caught by surprise by wind shadow, didn't swerve deliberately and there was never any risk of a collision P is in the clear.
Case 50 in the Case book is relevant. "When a protest committee finds that in a port-starboard incident S did not change course and that there was not a genuine and reasonable apprehension of collision on the part of S, it should dismiss her protest. When the committee finds that S did change course and that there was reasonable doubt that P could have crossed ahead of S if S had not changed course, then P should be disqualified." |
|||
![]() |
|||
Noah ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 29 Dec 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 611 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
If the swerve was to avoid a collision then Port is plainly in the wrong and should be protested or retire. If, however, the swerve and capsize was due to the wind shadow of the reaching boat then no foul. As I have found, to my cost recently, light boats react much more to wake and wind shadow than heavier craft 😱
|
|||
Nick
D-Zero 316 |
|||
![]() |
|||
423zero ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 08 Jan 15 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 3420 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Two boats beating, about five lengths apart, wind force four gusting to over five, so both going fast. Third boat on a fast reach passes between the two boats (90 degrees), causing chasing boat to swerve violently and capsize. No warnings shouted. (beating boats both on starboard, crossing boat on port).
What should have happened ?
|
|||
Robert
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Dakota ![]() Posting king ![]() ![]() Joined: 15 Aug 22 Online Status: Offline Posts: 168 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Totally agree too with both posts. Isn’t that just what 99% of us are doing every time we race .
![]() |
|||
Duncan
D-zero 315 |
|||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1234 9> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |