Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
Laser 161752 Tynemouth |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
Change the PY System? |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 12131415> |
Author | ||||
PeterG ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 12 Jan 08 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 822 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 27 Jul 17 at 1:42pm |
|||
So if you only have one or two of a given class how does it not calculate a personal handicap? Presumably that would result in a low confidence factor, and so the club couldn't adopt it?
Perhaps I misunderstand you, but it surely doesn't matter if there are only one or two boats of a class at a club, provided you use the nationally based PY and a set of nationally based rules for local adjustment (based on inland/sea, small/large etc), which will have been worked out from the results of a large number of that class over a range of conditions. It also highlights the difficulties, and dangers, of trying to do local PY adjustments without a set of nationally derived adjustment rules to folllow - otherwise the adjustments are likely to be highly subjective, and to end up becoming personal handicaps reflecting the abilities of the local helms where the number in a class locally is small.
|
||||
Peter
Ex Cont 707 Ex Laser 189635 DY 59 |
||||
![]() |
||||
Oli ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 23 Mar 05 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1020 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
A2Z,
py adjusted when reached cf 0.3 (you could do variations of this with % of handicap as cf goes up) we did have classes max out cf. 3 races won back to back by class meant early adjustment but kept under review and decided by committee if it should revert back. perhaps i would change it to % change if doing it again and no committee review, as people can be lobbied by interested parties. we only had one class that was on its own and it did reach high enough cf within our rules, it didnt stop them winning by any stretch. we now have a few of those boats sailing. my experience of adjusting locally never led me to believe we were penalising one boat or another, never stopped the good sailors from winning, and brought the back of the fleet up to make it feel like they achieved and the middle fleet had great racing with positions swapping. we introduced more all in racing to get extra data, a specific personal handicap series for some fun (the best guys still won). it was the mid fleet sailors most upset actually due to delusions of grandeur from what i could tell. |
||||
![]() |
||||
Guests ![]() Guest Group ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
But there are no nationally based rules, so the local adjustment can't be fairly done.
|
||||
![]() |
||||
Oli ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 23 Mar 05 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1020 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
it would be worth you asking them if they can add that function.
|
||||
![]() |
||||
Oli ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 23 Mar 05 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1020 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
nope no rules set down from the top, i have previously suggested they do that directly as it would assist all the clubs in adjusting. but what works for one may not work for another. your local rule can be your local rule, py data is taking in raw time format so what ever you do the overall data is not affected.
|
||||
![]() |
||||
Sam.Spoons ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 07 Mar 12 Location: Manchester UK Online Status: Offline Posts: 3401 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
Yup, absolutely no disagreement from me there.
|
||||
Spice 346 "Flat Broke"
Blaze 671 "supersonic soap dish" |
||||
![]() |
||||
Sam.Spoons ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 07 Mar 12 Location: Manchester UK Online Status: Offline Posts: 3401 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
You can almost do that as the 'by boat' search shows each club's adjusted PN and the number of boats at the club but not the number of races returned for that boat.
|
||||
Spice 346 "Flat Broke"
Blaze 671 "supersonic soap dish" |
||||
![]() |
||||
Eisvogel ![]() Posting king ![]() ![]() Joined: 09 Dec 16 Location: Birmingham Online Status: Offline Posts: 135 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
It's already on that page: just select 'CLASSES' and enter the class you want to see.
|
||||
Enterprise 20361 (Eisvogel), Laser 102727 (Halcyon), Laser 121986
|
||||
![]() |
||||
Cirrus ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 29 Oct 15 Location: UK Online Status: Offline Posts: 590 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
Cirrus, instead of being all mysterious, why not just make your point and rest of Forum can tell you why it won't work.,...
Sorry I'm finding your own point
beyond me now ! It must be catching.
The point I'm making is that the
GL numbers are a derivative of the PN system. 'They' are doing more or
less what the RYA suggests all the time - modifying 'raw' numbers in the light
of their direct experience and recorded results. OK their approach also
emphasises the importance of 'front of class' performance as well etc and
this might rile a few as it does not follow to the letter what is written
on the tablets of stone .... (and so few round the clubs ever dare use !) Nothing mysterious to the increasingly large numbers of entrants who race under the system and it does produce great racing and events. Now I'm sure many here will have raced at the SJ winter series and/or at the growing number of other events using these revisionist numbers. Ultimately nobody forces anyone to race under 'raw' PN or these adjusted GL numbers. You could do either or both.... most will still do both but GL numbers use is spreading for a reason. Just perhaps the RYA could learn
a bit from seeing how others do adjust the numbers and sample
structure. A bit more openness to alternatives that possibly does
look beyond an apparent 'not invented here' stance could help. And that's me done - next stop a sailing week that switched to using GL numbers about 3 years ago and it was very well received btw ..... and if they had not I'd still race in it ! Edited by Cirrus - 27 Jul 17 at 3:43pm |
||||
![]() |
||||
turnturtle ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 05 Dec 14 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2538 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
Do the rya actually take that stance or is this more wild supposision based on the blue blazer and chino stereotype? I understood there was a fair amount of discussion and liaison between the PYAG and GL teams??
Edited by turnturtle - 27 Jul 17 at 4:01pm |
||||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 12131415> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |