Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
Laser 161752 Tynemouth |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
New class PY numbers? |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 123 4> |
Author | ||||
Sam.Spoons ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 07 Mar 12 Location: Manchester UK Online Status: Offline Posts: 3401 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 17 Feb 17 at 12:02pm |
|||
How does a new class get a PN? Obviously once enough boats are raced to show up in the returns a number will be forthcoming but who decides what number to give a boat when they first show it at the dinghy show/race it at a handicap event?
I have a Spice, as far as I'm aware the last number recorded is the same as the number suggested at launch, presumably as there were enough returns for Spice to appear in the EN list but not enough to precipitate a change or promotion to the main list. Who decided that 930 was the right number for the Spice to start is racing career with? I have a suspicion that in some cases a lower than realistic number is chosen to make the boat look faster than it actually is. Alternatively an entry into a couple of high profile handicap events combined with an artificially high number might lead to a couple of publicity generating wins. Who knows ;) Edited by Sam.Spoons - 17 Feb 17 at 12:13pm |
||||
![]() |
||||
MattK ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() ![]() Joined: 02 Feb 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 221 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
http://www.rya.org.uk/SiteCollectionDocuments/technical/Web%20Documents/PY%20Documentation/PY-Using%20the%20scheme.pdf Experimental List Trial Number |
||||
![]() |
||||
Sam.Spoons ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 07 Mar 12 Location: Manchester UK Online Status: Offline Posts: 3401 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
Yup, read all that but who decides what the Trial Number should be?
Spice will never have a 'real' (i.e. garnered from sufficient race results) number as there are very few (less than half a dozen I'd guess) racing infrequently at clubs that file returns so it's just a matter of persuading the race committee at my clubs that 950 is more realistic
![]() |
||||
![]() |
||||
MattK ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() ![]() Joined: 02 Feb 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 221 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
Experimental List - published by the RYA
Trial Number - allocated by a club
|
||||
![]() |
||||
fab100 ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 15 Mar 11 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1005 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
In the brave new world, iGRF will decide based on whatever over-simplistic parameters his mood dictates at the time. With new designs his affection for the design, designer and builder will be pivotal. ![]() ![]() But the system will be far fairer than the current conspiracy against him perpetrated by the RYA PN system. ![]() Leg-pulling aside, It does seem logical to me that, if an established class has a material rule-change (weight reduction, larger sails for instance) it should lose the established number as soon as the change is made and a revised (lower) Experimental Number issued in anticipation, rather than letting them bandit for a year or more until the results catch-up with them
|
||||
![]() |
||||
jeffers ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 29 Mar 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 3048 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
When I got my D-Zero there was no data on it at all. The builder would not be drawn on a potential PY (some might say rightly so).
The way to start a trial number would be to find a boat of broadly similar spec and use that as a base point. I suggested to my club we use the Rooster 8.1 as a start point. Similar sail area, similar type of boat and a boat they could measure my own performance against as I previously sailed one.
It worked pretty well on the whole. We did agree to drop to the GL PY after a while as people said we were winning too much (NB I felt my performance was on a par with my Laser/8.1 sailing). This made no difference. |
||||
Paul
---------------------- D-Zero GBR 74 |
||||
![]() |
||||
iGRF ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 07 Mar 11 Location: Hythe Online Status: Offline Posts: 6499 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
Or you could fashion a formula based on boat length, weight, sail size, displacement, etc
Open to anyone to plug in their figures and it spits out a number. OK so the number won't necessarily be anymore accurate than what happens now, but it would at least be the same for everyone which is not what has happened over the years. It would also not be open to Gerrymandering by outfits like Sailjuice to suit their own agenda which then in turn effects the entire system. |
||||
![]() |
||||
RS400atC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 04 Dec 08 Online Status: Offline Posts: 3011 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
If the spice with two trapezes isn't 20 points faster than a 400 with no trapezes, there is something badly wrong. The Buzz sails well above its PY as soon as the wire becomes useful, I've seen good club sailors get them well up amongh the 400's.
Of course if you are sailing on water where it's not suited, you will be lucky to sail to the PY, but the national average PY can't be expected to account for people like me who take 505's to narrow rivers etc. There are many failures that the PY should be called to account over, the blind alley of the 90s Topper range is not IMHO one of them. Just enjoy it on the water and find your own way of keeping track of improving? |
||||
![]() |
||||
Sam.Spoons ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 07 Mar 12 Location: Manchester UK Online Status: Offline Posts: 3401 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
It definitely isn't with me sailing it ![]()
Absolutely
Again absolutely, the other examples, ISO and Buzz were sufficiently successful to achieve critical mass unlike the Spice (and to a lesser extent the Boss). Iso is a couple of feet longer, supposedly 15kg heavier, has a slightly smaller rig and only one wire but, according to the PY list is 7 points faster than Spice (and 20 points faster than a 400). That WL effect again?
And yet again, absolutely. This will be my 10th season in the Spice and I haven't regretted buying it for a second (and I now have the Blaze for slightly more serious racing).
Edited by Sam.Spoons - 17 Feb 17 at 3:15pm |
||||
![]() |
||||
RS400atC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 04 Dec 08 Online Status: Offline Posts: 3011 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
The 400 is a bit longer, but the bow is probably raked more? So LWL is not hugely different.
The alleged 85kg of the 400 is bare hull. On the water I suspect heavier than some Merlins. The claimed weight of the Spice is the same. LWL does not seem to affect I14's too badly, their upwind sail area is only another 2 or 3 sqm. LWL is good at low speed for sure. But you need a narrow waterline and and a couple of decades of Merlin knowledge to get the best out of it. At higher speeds you don't want a round bilge at the blunt end. There are certain hull shapes that had to be tried in the last 25 years, just to prove they really were a bad idea. I don't know why you started this thread, with a reference to a dead class like the Spice. Do you have a CA? Classs rules? Any actual data? You are only ever going to get a number dredged out of the past or some personal performance based nonsense like the cruisers have for NHC. Either stick a GPS on it and take it out in a proper breeze and come back with pictures of 20 knots, or we'll sort out a suburban roundabout and some geraniums. |
||||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 123 4> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |