New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: Thunder ang lightning
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Thunder ang lightning

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 234
Author
Chris 249 View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 10 May 04
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2041
Post Options Post Options   Quote Chris 249 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Thunder ang lightning
    Posted: 14 Jun 16 at 12:41pm


Originally posted by blueboy

Originally posted by JimC

My take on the RRS4 thing is that is stands absolutely, but my opinion is legally worthless, as, I suspect, is that of other posters. 


Negotiating and interpreting contracts is part of my day job.

RRS4 is a contract term. When you race you contract with the organising authority and agreeing to abide by RRS is part of the contract. That's been established in court (when one large expensive yacht hit another).

In UK law contract terms that attempt to exclude negligence are unenforceable. So if a club's conduct in running a race were found to be negligent, RRS4 is void.

Negligence, roughly speaking, is falling below a reasonable standard of care. What's reasonable? That's for a court to decide. What's reasonable for ocean racers isn't reasonable for Optimists. What's certain is that RRS4 doesn't absolve clubs of the need to exercise reasonable care in running racing. That's why RORC postponed a Fastnet start for 24 hours.

Sorry if that's unwelcome news. But if a club isn't demonstrably performing risk assessment before running racing, someone is going to have an uncomfortable time if they ever need to defend their conduct in court. 



I normally work in anti-corruption and professional standards roles when anyone can persuade me to sit behind a desk so I'm no contract expert, but Blueboy has nailed it.

While it may seem unfair that contracts cannot exclude negligence, the alternative is worse. Imagine if your council, gas supplier, bus company, airline and other large companies could present you with a contract that had an exclusion clause in small print, when they knew that you had no alternative but to sign it and therefore waive your rights for compensation even if they were negligent.  One only has to roll back to the Victorian era and see what large corporations may do if negligence can be excluded by contract.

Anyway, here's a pic of what I thought the thread was going to be about;



\


Edited by Chris 249 - 14 Jun 16 at 12:47pm
sailcraftblog.wordpress.com

The history and design of the racing dinghy.
Back to Top
Presuming Ed View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 26 Feb 05
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 641
Post Options Post Options   Quote Presuming Ed Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14 Jun 16 at 1:41pm
This is woth reading: "Race, Training and Event Management The Legal Aspects" from the RYA. 

http://www.rya.org.uk/SiteCollectionDocuments/legal/Web%20Documents/Legal%20Leaflets/Clubs/Health%20and%20Safety/RYA%20RACE%20TRAINING%20AND%20EVENT%20MANAGEMENT%20-%20LEGAL%20ASPECTS.pdf



Edited by Presuming Ed - 14 Jun 16 at 1:42pm
Back to Top
Presuming Ed View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 26 Feb 05
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 641
Post Options Post Options   Quote Presuming Ed Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14 Jun 16 at 1:52pm
Originally posted by Chris 249

Anyway, here's a pic of what I thought the thread was going to be about;

You and me both. 

Back to Top
JimC View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 17 May 04
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6662
Post Options Post Options   Quote JimC Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14 Jun 16 at 1:54pm
Originally posted by Presuming Ed

This is worth reading: Race, Training and Event Management The Legal Aspects from the RYA. 


That's indeed worth reading. I note an appeal court judgement including the words
it would be unreasonable to impose on public authorities a duty to protect persons from self-inflicted harm sustained when taking voluntary risks in the face of obvious dangers.


Edited by JimC - 14 Jun 16 at 1:57pm
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 234

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.665y
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz
Change your personal settings, or read our privacy policy