Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
Laser 161752 Tynemouth |
![]() |
Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
Personal Handicaps |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 123 7> |
Author | ||
Medway Maniac ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 13 May 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 2788 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 24 Nov 14 at 11:20am |
|
Just bumping this, as I was hoping someone might be able to tell us how to get Sailwave to display an entry's average BCR for a series (or even better, over several series). I guess the answer is that you need to keep a separate spreadsheet, filled manually, but hope springs eternal... |
||
![]() |
||
Chris 249 ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 10 May 04 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2041 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Down here, personal handicaps are used in most class races as well, and people do seem to get an extra buzz from a personal handicap win or place, on top of the buzz they get from simply finishing ahead of their normal place. We used to do a bit of coaching at our old club and we actually enjoyed watching the handicaps of the whole fleet get closer to the scratch boat (us) as the standard of sailing improved. One of the things about the standard systems down here is that when the scratch boat does even better than usual and wins on personal handicap as well, everyone else in the fleet has their personal handicap increased. That means that instead of feeling crushed by the scratch boat dominating, the rest of the fleet get cheered up by getting a better handicap. It's not particularly logical, but IMHO trying to race A Class cats against Optis (which I've seen) is also not exactly logical racing. Having a big handicap doesn't have to be seen as patronising - it's recognition of the fact that some people don't sail as fast because they have less experience, or have more important things than sailing to attend to in life and therefore can't train as hard. It's not much different from having a regular bet of a post-race beer with a friend of similar standard; no one seems to feel diminished if their personal bet (or simply personal rival) is close to the back of the fleet, so why feel diminished if your personal handicap is also close to the back of the fleet? It's not as if people don't know where you finish normally! Sailing is very hard to learn and many sports are moving to a model that stresses a target set by the individual competitor rather than stressing a finishing position, so why shouldn't sailing do something similar? Don't many sporting clubs have a 'most improved competitor' prize at the annual prizegiving, and isn't personal handicapping just a more regular version of the same ideal? A national system that set you a personal handicap on top of your boat's PY would be great to see; not the sort of thing our rather elitist national body down here will do. Edited by Chris 249 - 18 Nov 14 at 11:07pm |
||
![]() |
||
RS400atC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 04 Dec 08 Online Status: Offline Posts: 3011 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
1) there is a school of thought that an inverted boat is safer than one that blows away.
2) I don't know what the RCD says? I think it does not aply to racing only boats, but that's a small market, and new classes are so often looking for a slice of the training and beach holiday market. For myself, I reckon it's usually quicker to right and drain a capsized Merlin than an inverted RS400. |
||
![]() |
||
Rupert ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 11 Aug 04 Location: Whitefriars sc Online Status: Offline Posts: 8956 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Somewhere between 1/3 and 1/2 way down is my guess for me. |
||
Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686
|
||
![]() |
||
kneewrecker ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 09 Apr 14 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1586 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Ok- fair enough :-)
|
||
![]() |
||
Rupert ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 11 Aug 04 Location: Whitefriars sc Online Status: Offline Posts: 8956 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
In the same places I let him go out without safety cover in the Lightning, yes. If anyone is going to be able to get back in a lightweight boat it is a capsize-skilled teenager. |
||
Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686
|
||
![]() |
||
iGRF ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 07 Mar 11 Location: Hythe Online Status: Offline Posts: 6499 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
It was my big design flaw with the V twin, but then I wasn't designing it to fall over in the first place, Interestingly the EPS has holes drilled in the racks so they sink a bit, but personally I'll take going in over the back over coming up in a bath tub like the Alto, which takes almost an entire leg to clear meaning 1 capsize in a race and your done.
It was an annoyance in the RS100, but that had other issues as well, not least its windward speed with its small sail, what's this got to do with handicaps and my national ranking idea.. Where do you think you'd place on such a thing? |
||
![]() |
||
kneewrecker ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 09 Apr 14 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1586 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Rupert - question for you... after reading that, would you let your son go out in one without safety cover?
|
||
![]() |
||
Medway Maniac ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 13 May 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 2788 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Short answer: because it's cheap and looks good. The problem lies in too-buoyant side tanks. You can, of course, have separate double bottom and side decks, so that water can flood over the side-deck when you capsize and fill the space above the double bottom, so that the buoyancy is more in the centre of the boat. That is impossible to create without two deck mouldings, however, which involves extra costs that builders are loath to incur. JimC did once post a photo of a Cherub (I think) with almost no side tanks, but which provided adequate side-deck width by making the gunwale lip very wide. It was not reported what sort of capsize performance it had. It would be nice if builders bit the bullet and produced buoyancy arrangements as I've described, that allowed boats to self-drain yet float low on their side to reduce the risk of inversion and make it easy to get onto the board from the water, but the L2k and MkIV Wayfarer show they aren't doing it yet. Maybe they are waiting for the first fatality.
|
||
![]() |
||
Rupert ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 11 Aug 04 Location: Whitefriars sc Online Status: Offline Posts: 8956 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I'd be very fat at 86kgs - quite fat at 72... Mostly, though it is the technique that will need honing - not likely to have happened over a 10 minute period at Minorca sailing. I could say exactly the same of Lasers, as I'm short and have trouble with such a wide sidedeck to pull myself over - doesn't mean I'd write an article about it based on a lunchtime sail. |
||
Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686
|
||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 123 7> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |