Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
Latest legal Laser tweaks???? |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 1213141516 19> |
Author | ||
Chris 249 ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 10 May 04 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2041 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 22 Jun 14 at 10:06am |
|
I was sailing Lasers at 11 stone and I would sail a Radial instead of a Byte because; 1- the Radial is vastly more popular in most places and while I sail large and small classes, I generally prefer the larger classes. 2- I like the Laser-type rig for the sailing that I do in hiking singlehanders. As Julian Bethwaite has said, "pinhead" rigs suit displacement-type boats. For me, strictly as a personal thing, hiking singlehanders fit into a particular slot and the Laser rig works well for me in such situations, just as a "skiff/Byte style" rig works well for me in other forms of sailing, or for people with different tastes and different situations. 3- As Ian Bruce and some other Byte CII class sources say, the Byte CII is twitchy downwind because of the high C of E and the fact that the hull is finer around the mast and shorter. Not everyone likes that, just as not everyone like the way the Laser goes uphill. If someone prefer the Byte's feel to a Laser's feel, great - have a good time! But it's a personal taste thing, surely. 4- The Radial is faster, for what it's worth. 5 - If I was looking for a boat with "pretensions to modernity" I'd get a new rig AND a new hull, not a new rig on an old hull. By the way, lots of people under 40 sail Lasers. And many of us over 40 are still getting into lots of new sporting disciplines so we can appreciate new stuff AND old stuff. What some of us can't understand is people telling others what they should like. Edited by Chris 249 - 23 Jun 14 at 12:36am |
||
![]() |
||
Chris 249 ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 10 May 04 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2041 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
It doesn't work for all of us, Dan. I know from bitter experience that I'll go like a dog unless I've done a lot of training and lead-up races in the same class. That applies even in classes in which I have previously won titles and therefore I thought I could do well without much lead-up. Michael Blackburn wrote something similar and he was not the world's worst Laser sailor, so it may not all be my personal lack of talent. By the way, I've stepped off Tornadoes, windsurfers and Canoes that have been in the national title placings onto a Laser and found that the Laser was enormous fun. Sure, it's slower and more draggy than the board, cat or Canoe - so what, I bet your design is too, but it still looks like a great boat.
Edited by Chris 249 - 22 Jun 14 at 12:00pm |
||
![]() |
||
Chris 249 ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 10 May 04 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2041 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
There's no duplication if you turn up with a really old Laser with the right number, but there can easily be duplication if people turn up with only the first three digits of their real number - especially when the same database is used for several class or club events to save having to duplicate all of the data entry each time. Surely it's simple good manners for competitors to turn up with the right sail number and make life easier for the volunteers? I know this from both sides 'cause I'm very guilty of using the wrong numbers, even when I'm running the event.
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
Chris 249 ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 10 May 04 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2041 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Mike; I said 10 pages ago that I would personally be happy to change some things on the Laser, and in earlier threads I listed them. But what I would be happy for the class to isn't the point IMHO. The point is that those who do not want the class to change much can have an entirely reasonable position (IMHO) even if you and I don't share it, and therefore should be treated reasonably. Dinghy development is an incredibly complex area, especially for International classes. We could have a really interesting discussion about possibilities but belittling people just because they don't have the same views pretty much nips that in the bud, IMHO. Saying "those who don't agree with me are brainwashed" seems just like saying "those who don't agree with me are wrong" and that doesn't seem to allow for much in the way of nuances, information, discussion or reasoned debate. Edited by Chris 249 - 23 Jun 14 at 12:42am |
||
![]() |
||
blaze720 ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 28 Sep 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1635 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Hi Chris
This is a general 'forum' ... not a closed CA paid up members debate ! Nobody is submitting formal proposals or presenting papers for peer review here either ... simply the wrong place. If people do or some think nobody else should put up 'radical' and informal views it is hardly surprising when they find the environment a bit jocular. We do appreciate that they might like a more 'serious' debate about class proposals but really that is for others elsewhere anyway - design rights holders, builders, owners, CA etc etc. However this is a general 'dinghy development' forum and so you will find robust and challenging dialogue and views here often. So maybe the message should be 'Lighten up buddy' ! Treat the contributions as of interest but maybe not too seriously. Nobody is forcing change on the Laser here - all that is simply happening is exactly the sort of sailing club bar debate that happens every weekend and in a great many locations. If 'proper' or specific 'Laser change' debate was really possible or more critically we really thought changes beyond 'knot-tying' semantics was likely, within say a decade or two, we might try an alternative approach. Briefly - my own 'serious' view is perhaps shared with the majority - little of consequence Laser change wise is about any time soon. So I'm really quite happy to leave the remaining dialogue to current Laser types ... And I sincerely hope they continue to enjoy the boat. Mike L. Edited by blaze720 - 22 Jun 14 at 4:08pm |
||
![]() |
||
Xpletive ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() Joined: 28 Jan 06 Online Status: Offline Posts: 320 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
What a relief we have your blessing! Get back to your Deckchair/Blasé.
|
||
![]() |
||
iGRF ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 07 Mar 11 Location: Hythe Online Status: Offline Posts: 6499 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Not having had 'the pleasure' I can't comment about the Aero, but as far as it being a 'major threat' to the Laser, that I'm afraid is impossible. Until it has been around for a good many years, with hundreds of second hand boats and a truly household name, which is unlikely to ever be equalled in public perception, I can't see it. This Sunday we had about 20 odd boats and crews out with a good percentage of Lasers and I doubt any of them will even have heard of the Aero, in two weeks time a few of them will have heard of the D Zero after their demo, but that will come and go, maybe a couple will stick but it'll be another year or two before the odd Aero turns up and unless it comes in good hands and manages to get even close to our Laser Hot shots it'll be forgotten. I hope it gains traction, everything I've criticised about dinghy sailing all this time has been addressed in that boat, but they need to turn the 'on' switch up on the production line, there should have been dozens available now, for this summer, by next month it'll be too late for the casual adult market, fine they'll be at the Southampton Boat Show, but another year will have passed, another year where more Lasers will get sold because they are there, easily available for the newcomer that clubs like us are trying to attract, and so it'll carry on, they are such an easy route to get members to join, buy it now, sail it tomorrow in company, no boat, no amount of marketing is going to challenge that, the only thing that challenges Lasers dominance is Laser themselves and the seemingly anal t**ts they surround themselves with on the organisational front. Edited by iGRF - 23 Jun 14 at 10:32am |
||
![]() |
||
Null ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 11 May 14 Online Status: Offline Posts: 745 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Alan did you try the D-Zero before you placed your order? Probably worth taking heed of your own before ordering IMO and that of others who have. To my mind the Aero has as much chance as replacing the laser as i have of winning the laser Nationals. But then i don't think that's what RS (or Devoti) are trying to do. Its obvious by the Laser, Solo, Phantom success that this area of the market is the largest, so having a viable product in the segment is right for their business models. Its important to remember that this does all stem back to someone trying to make a living by developing, manufacturing and turning a profit out of a product. Sure they both want to make a success of themselves and if they could replicate half the success they have swam the ocean in my mind.
|
||
![]() |
||
piglet ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 04 Jan 07 Online Status: Offline Posts: 514 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
iGRF has said it all.
Aero might be a great idea but there are not dozens of them lying around every boatpark in every country.
My son is just about to leave Topper squad, and the next S/H pathway boat is not the D, the Aero or anything else. Which I'm not unhappy about because in the greatar scheme of things Lasers are relatively cheap to campaign, and we can have a 'rough as a bears backside' hull on the beach for club sailing.
Same arguement rages in Oppie vs Terra
|
||
![]() |
||
sandgrounder ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() Joined: 01 Apr 11 Online Status: Offline Posts: 220 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I suspect there is a significant group of people who will purchase a D-Zero by virtue of the fact that it's such a nice boat to sail, in addition to which it represents fantastic value for money, in comparison to, say, the Laser. I doubt that any of that group would care what the "pathway" boat happens to be. |
||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 1213141516 19> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |