Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
Latest legal Laser tweaks???? |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 910111213 19> |
Author | ||
iiitick ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() Joined: 04 Jun 14 Location: gb Online Status: Offline Posts: 478 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 19 Jun 14 at 11:58pm |
|
There you go again with facts and figures.......How reliable are these? The young lady who has qualified for the Youth Olympics is not a member of the CA nor is my mate Andy, and anyway the Uk CA has 53 members. So there......
Laser lover......
|
||
![]() |
||
Chris 249 ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 10 May 04 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2041 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
None of the Laser defenders here have said anything like that, Mike. To a certain extent the argument may be between those who see the boat in isolation on one side, and those who see the class as a whole on the other. Yes, the boat is not perfect. Yes, the boat may not be coming into its prime (although in some ways it arguably is doing extremely well), no the boat will not reign for 1000 years, yes, it can be improved. But surely the fact that the boat could be improved does not mean that all of those improvements would necessarily be better for the class (or the sport) as a whole? For example, the class is in a very different position in other countries to the position it is in the UK, because simple geography and demographics mean that other countries are normally more centred on local OD club racing than the UK is. Ok. that may put the class under a certain pressure in the UK - but is it better to force the entire world to change just for a certain number of sailors in one country? Would UK sailors be better off as a whole if they forced through changes that helped the class in the UK, but cost it numbers in the rest of the world? Personally I would support (and have supported) some changes that can be retrofitted, as I have in every class I own. However, that doesn't mean that those who hold different views, and their arguments, have to be belittled. If your argument is based on sound facts and evidence and so foolproof and sound that is should be obvious to all, then why not present it rather than just sneer at those with different views? Edited by Chris 249 - 20 Jun 14 at 3:04am |
||
![]() |
||
Chris 249 ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 10 May 04 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2041 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Popular? Care to provide some evidence? Sure, not all facts and figures are foolproof but it's still better to look at them than it is to ignore them The Byte is a nice little boat and I was very interested to see what would happen when the CII was introduced. The deal that Ian did was outstanding and for that reason I saw it as a test case for how a similar update could work on the Laser. It appears that the fleet numbers are down in the major sailing nations, or all the ones I can find data for anyway, and therefore it's hard to see why a similar major update would work for the Laser class as a whole. I can see that back in earlier years the class was getting some good numbers in North America (64 boats at CORK in '97, 88 at the 2005 North Americans) but there were only about 11 people from North America at the last NAs. The class has clearly benefited at times from its inclusion in the Youth Worlds and Youth Olympics, so it's actually received much more "official" support than other classes. Given that, how can any lack of numbers be blamed on the RYA and similar bodies? Edited by Chris 249 - 20 Jun 14 at 3:06am |
||
![]() |
||
JimC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
The figures are supplied to ISAF by the CA... They're supposed to represent registered members who actively race. Obviously they don't represent every sailor, but its not unreasonable to compare them between classes. |
||
![]() |
||
iiitick ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() Joined: 04 Jun 14 Location: gb Online Status: Offline Posts: 478 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
61 boats at the Worlds sounds fairly good to me. As far as anyone knows there are quite a lot of C2's kicking round the country. People took up old hulls and fitted new rigs to them. At our club we have three very active boats and two in the nettles, there is another at a club down the road. How many active boats are members of a ca? C2's also sell easily. What we need is all those active boats scraping together and turning up at Calshot for the Nationals. Hartley had orders for 15 boats about 6 weeks ago.
What I just cannot understand is why anyone sub-elleven stone prefers to sail a Laser and why the RYA does not see the need for a boys/girls boat with pretensions to modernity but sticks them in 4.7's. We are of course a grumpy old lot on here, set in our ways. Is there anyone under 40?
|
||
![]() |
||
Rupert ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 11 Aug 04 Location: Whitefriars sc Online Status: Offline Posts: 8956 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Of course the Laser class as a whole isn't going to adopt a C2 style rig, and of course the Laser in one form or another (Radial, 4.7) is going to be used in world events.
Why on earth wouldn't they use the most commonly available boat in the world to do world events, and why would they change something which is so widespread? There is nothing for them to gain, and loads to lose. For me, they would have done better in 1970 something to allow a 6:1 kicker and cunningham (with actual blocks, but using the same cleats) to replace the simple old ones, banned the use of cats cradles and then kept it like that. No string all over the place, no expensive XD kits. So I think they have maybe made themselves too complex already. Mind, once they are rigged, they work well, and they opened the boat up to lighter weight sailors, but they really are a pain to get rigged right if you don't use them week in week out and lean the system. BUT, if you own a Laser at club level, and you and some mates want to put a carbon mast and mylar sail on your boats, what is to stop you? Could be a fun project if you happen to have some spare cash burning a hole in your pocket. |
||
Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686
|
||
![]() |
||
maxibuddah ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 06 Mar 09 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1760 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
So what happens then if you turn up with a really really antique laser then? Anyway what is really wrong with the laser? It's brief was to be a cheap fun boat that is easy to rig and sail, which it was and still is. It's the organisations that want it to so much more, it isn't the boats fault. Yeah there are things that could have been sorted better such as the addition of a single block in the kicker system to saving having to buy 5 metres of the slippiest string you could find every 6 months, but no again that was the ca stopping you. No you can't have a 20 quid block but here's a £150 new kicker we will let you have. Commercialisation and greed are what has ruined the class for me, not the boat. As for the rigging, well the rear sheeting is probably down to the cheapness of the boom as I reckon in the early days if you had put all the sheeting loads through the centre only it would have broken. I still don't think you'll find a better boat for having a blast in a good breeze for the money. Damn good fun and satisfying when you got it right. If I could get under the boom I would possibly get a cheap one again, just for those windy days
|
||
Everything I say is my opinion, honest
|
||
![]() |
||
kneewrecker ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 09 Apr 14 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1586 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
This is a very good point, and in the UK, at least we have options to buy other boats and still get good racing. I've heard of a club on the south coast which has basically lost its entire Laser fleet now- many migrating to Solos. A few of the ex-Laser sailors are actually buying into the RS Aero fleet deal now as in reality, the Solo isn't quite exciting enough for them, despite the excellent racing credentials.
|
||
![]() |
||
iiitick ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() Joined: 04 Jun 14 Location: gb Online Status: Offline Posts: 478 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
If we had banned the use of mid engined racing cars throughout the World there would have been 'fleets' of old front engined cars out there...like Lasers. Single handed international sailing is getting like Cuba, full of old 'Yank Tanks'. Remember I am old but not fuddy duddy.........I took my thwart out!!! |
||
![]() |
||
blaze720 ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 28 Sep 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1635 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Chris
There is no sneering here ... if you think about it you are now coming around to agree that the Laser could benefit from having a few of its 'wrinkles' smoothed out ... exactly what I and many others are saying. If there is any difference between us it is only to the extent of what needs doing ... NOT that some things should be ignored forever. You have your own private 'hit' list maybe but don't tell us what exactly you think might be tackled usefully ... but a few of us 'knockers' have suggested identifiable improvements... and get a bit of jocular feedback ... well of course. You might disagee with some of them, so put the case up for retaining its disputed 'characteristics'. Using the 50,000 'whatsits' cant possibly be wrong argument is to ignore proper debate by almost stating 'you have never had it so good' - ignoring the case for debate. This effective stonewall approach to dealing with the 'threat' of new ideas is not a great or sustainable line in the long term. But .. this is also a forum and a fair bit of tongue in cheek 'banter' is to be expected. And by general standards the Y&Y forum is really very civilised. So surely you do not want a 'gentlemans club' atmosphere here ! This is not the place for formal papers to be presented either ... it is usually much closer to the typical sailing club bar discussion.... and none the worse at all for that imo. 'Sneering' ?... oh I don't think anyone has really started that just yet ! (Taking the **** maybe - as well we might if apres sailing ) Anyway Mark would soon step in to stop that sort of thing .. ![]() Mike L. Edited by blaze720 - 20 Jun 14 at 10:05am |
||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 910111213 19> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |