Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
Published Hull Weights |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 1415161718 24> |
Author | |
pondmonkey ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 12 Aug 11 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2202 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 02 May 13 at 2:34pm |
so a product manufacturer, who in the main is concerned with class racing and fleet development, possibly to save the class they love from extinction; now needs to hold back their product redevelopment because some old crusty on a sailing club committee doesn't know how to use PY as the RYA intended? Surely there is enough evidence and top down support now to neuter any of these 'outlandish PY debates' we seem to find ourselves in time and again... if it's the wrong number for your club, or someone shows up with a Mk 3 Supernova and is catapulted to the front of the fleet and that sits uncomfortably with you and all around you... then change the number as per the RYA instruction. If s/he doesn't like it, then they can always bugger off to another club... in fact that would be a far less cruel exit than bullying them with passive aggression for being a 'bandit'. I can't see how holding back the class helps anyone though, especially if the boats become totally obsolete and worthless. If we going to overly concern ourselves about PY racing, (frankly, do we have to???) thus taking it far too seriously than just accepting it for what it is, which can be a fun way to go sailing with friends; then I'm afraid there's only one response.... 'RTFM'. As for the class discussion... I'd certainly touch it with a barge pole. My first Oppy was wooden boat, no cert, grossly overweight and didn't even have a sail number... but it was all my parents could afford (or were willing to invest until they knew my sister and I wanted to keep sailing). It served as entry point into the class, much as I see a £600 contender or an old woodie Phant these days. I was going to buy an old solo last year before investing 7 Grand in one on the same principle. Luckily for me, a chap lent his boat for a few sails so I didn't need to take this step. Cheap boats are good for class development, but there's no point in trying to develop a class where buying a newer one holds little incentive.
Edited by pondmonkey - 02 May 13 at 2:44pm |
|
![]() |
|
pondmonkey ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 12 Aug 11 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2202 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
a bit of both... judging from the shed at WPNSA loaded with new Lasers being rigged up for squaddies bought on their parents never never love tokens. I can imagine the whole ISAF infrastructure is 'good for business', hence the fuss the class is in currently.
Edited by pondmonkey - 02 May 13 at 2:45pm |
|
![]() |
|
transient ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 21 Aug 12 Online Status: Offline Posts: 715 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
so a product manufacturer, who in the main is concerned with class racing and fleet development, possibly to save the class they love from extinction;
Rather a rose coloured view IMO....In most cases the development is due to commercial reasons. They want to make a boat that has advantages over older boats so it sells more. because some old crusty on a sailing club committee doesn't know how to use PY as the RYA intended? yep, like many clubs. I tried to persuade but got fed up with banging my head against a brick wall. Perhaps the Supernove class will publish a recommended PY for the new hull. Surely there is enough evidence and top down support now to neuter any of these 'outlandish PY debates. You'd have thought so but alas not. Discussions about PY banditry will persist whether you or I give a FF. Lets face it they're not groundless. in fact that would be a far less cruel exit than bullying them with passive aggression for being a 'bandit'. Discussing it and making an attempt to influence the powers that be is not passive. If we going to overly concern ourselves about PY racing, (frankly, do we have to???) thus taking it far too seriously than just accepting it for what it is, which can be a fun way to go sailing with friends; then I'm afraid there's only one response.... 'RTFM'. How seriously others take handicap racing is up to them. With the advent of the "prestigious" Sailjuice series which I believe has cash prizes + the ensuing dodgy sail debates (twice) It would appear that many take it seriously..........I could be wrong here (you've changed your ID), wasn't it you who defended those who take exception to illegal sails..... sincere apologies if I'm wrong. As for the class discussion... I'd certainly touch it with a barge pole. If I were in your position and I had no choice, I'd be with you. ....Class racing is where my future serious interests lie, that is if time and age allow. Maybe I'm being overly cynical but IMHO many off these boats are developed by new builders precisely because they know they can produce a bandit which will appeal to a significant number of sailors in both types of racing
|
|
![]() |
|
jeffers ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 29 Mar 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 3048 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Part of the issue is with the data they used to get for returns was crap (to put is bluntly) so trying to look at trends and where boats were know to be getting faster (either quickly or slowly) was impossible. More forward thinking clubs who noticed that a particular type of boat was obviously favoured on their water or had gone through a rapid development phase sat around and adjusted the PY appropriately for those boats and submitted it with their returns. Now the PY submission system is online and they are taking raw data the system is more dynamic and can keep pace with change much better. hence the rapid recent movement of some classes. The example we had at Hunts was the class PY was 1047 which made even average and badly sailed boats beat known good sailors from other classes we we ran it off 1030 for a couple of years before the PY changes caught and have now overtaken that significantly. We now use the published PY for that class because it does seem to be about right. I am all for classes improving but, in reality, the CA should take a hand in this and see if they can monitor results from a few known clubs and given a rough estimate on how much faster they think the latest version of class X over the older boats. One thing we have at the moment is with the Solo. The new boats are clearly much faster than the older wooden boats and not just because they are new (sailors are upgrading boats and leaping up the fleet). Whether our learned sailing committee will do anything about this is unkown as I am not on it anymore. If it seems to become an issue I will raise it with them.
|
|
Paul
---------------------- D-Zero GBR 74 |
|
![]() |
|
AlanH ![]() Groupie ![]() Joined: 17 Apr 10 Location: Scotland Online Status: Offline Posts: 84 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Picking up the weight reduction topic of a few pages back, on Tuesday I tested an International Canoe for Yachting Life mag. The Int Canoe (that is the non assy version) agreed in 2009 a weight reduction from 83.5 to 50kgs. Now that's what I call a weight reduction.
|
|
![]() |
|
pondmonkey ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 12 Aug 11 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2202 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hi Transient, Maybe I'm being rose-tinted to think that the endeavour is primarily for class racing, not the silly PY stuff. Do people really buy boats with favourable PNs just to do better on spreadsheet in a club race? Especially these days where the numbers fluctuate from one year to the next? Alas those 'non-issue' issues that are PY racing will persist, and alas they are not totally groundless for those who can't accept the inherent flaws in the system- that being it isn't as perfect as class racing and it tests emotions and class loyalties. Best to not give a FF and not participate as your only form a competitive sailing. Or if you do, to compete in the spirit under which PY racing flourishes.... mates going for a sail with a bit of a competitive edge to it. The FOM was a good example, and I've done some regattas with a similar attitude in the past, and they weren't without enjoyment.
Sail Juice... well yes, probably the antithesis of what I've just said. A showboating trip for jockeys; a place to juke out 'the best of the best' from the rest; maybe even a chance for classes to pimp their wares to others... there was classic Tide Ride which started as an MPS/700 pissing contest- the MPS boys smashing the 'quicker on PY' boat out of the water. It's all a bit pathetic on reflection, I felt equally humiliated f**king my knee up again trying to keep up with Tim in a D1 upwind at the Stevie Nicks... no point, it was quicker. All for a handicap race... really, was it worth it? Yes, I did defend those who took exception to the rule breaking first time around, but I do acknowledge the team were simply unmeasured and did the honourable thing when they got hung out to dry by their CA after the fuss. Second time around I simply didn't care, I wasn't there... no way I'm going to drag a boat around to go handicap racing on another pond, when there's class racing on my own one. That was until some idiot with a sock puppet and an undeclared commercial interest got involved; then I thought about, looked into further, found that the boat was entered knowingly with illegal sails by the team sponsor- that to me stinks a bit. It's not a mistake, it's disrespectful & could have easily been avoided by pre-event declaration. No one suggested they should have been refused entry, and I doubt anyone would step-up with anything other than class PN as a special circumstance- especially if fellow fireballers were consulted. The right course of action to salvage any honour would have been for the team to also retire and for the sponsor to issue a proper truthful statement which acknowledged they just got the 'vibe' completely wrong with bringing proto kit. I don't think they did that- they stayed with their results and followed 'no such thing as bad publicity'. Whatever, as a result of their actions I know some folks who say a) they won't be attending any SJ events next year and b) have stopped spending any of their beer tokens at sailboats.co.uk . I can't say I blame them... Edited by pondmonkey - 02 May 13 at 5:10pm |
|
![]() |
|
rb_stretch ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 23 Aug 10 Online Status: Offline Posts: 742 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I've suspected that myself, but due to the fact that there are so many active old Solos I suspect you'll never get the averages to suggest a change. This in turn makes it very difficult for committees to make a change when there is no factual evidence to support it. |
|
![]() |
|
JimC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
If someone upgrades from a ratty old Solo with tired sails, out of date rig, grubby centreboard and scratched rudder to a new boat I see a 5 - 10% improvement in performance.
What I have never seen is what happens when someone upgrades from an immaculately prepared old wooden hull with a new rig and all the rest of it to a new Solo so the only variable is the hull construction. |
|
![]() |
|
craiggo ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 01 Apr 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1810 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Part of the problem with the new GRP versions of 1960s designs is that to build them up to the class minimum weight actually adds significant cost. In some cases you are looking at £300 of lead and build methodologies that are constrained to ensure the original design intent, which requires significant man hours that just aren't necessary.
From a builders point of view, if they can get the buy in of the class association to reduce the min weight, then the owners may need to buy new boats for £250-£1000 less than current. If this is well managed then its no problem, but I think the gradual continuous development has got to be favourable to a big step change if the builder can work in the improvements over a series of small changes. Hopefully the really heavy old tubs will die before the superlight boats get developed and then the progress is alway relatively small. |
|
![]() |
|
RS400atC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 04 Dec 08 Online Status: Offline Posts: 3011 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
£300 is an awful lot of lead. It's 'only' $2000 a tonne. i.e. a lot cheaper than wood or epoxy.... I would think the man-hours of weighing it, keeping the scales calibrated etc would cost a lot more than the lead. It's easier for SCOD builders just to not bother. The best way to reduce a class weight is probably like the B14's where they have adopted carbon racks with weight initially, giving lots of notice that the all-up weight will fall. The Merlins could do something similar, 90+% of those raced seriously at nationals and circuit carry a lot of lead. Penalising the few wooden boats would be unpopular though I expect? |
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 1415161718 24> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |