Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
Rules 'For Idiots' |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 123> |
Author | ||||
Jimbob ![]() Groupie ![]() Joined: 05 Sep 06 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 77 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 22 May 09 at 11:16pm |
|||
"1 - If you are approaching a windward mark, to be left to starboard, on starboard tack and there is a boat directly infront of you on the same tack - can he tack at the mark even though you would/could hit him ?. Sometoimes you get a stream of boats following and if the front boat cant then technically the guy at the back of the queue would round first ?."
This a very old chestnut and is very simple. Most of the replies so far are complicating the issue. Rule 18 clearly states that it does not apply between boats on opposite tacks on a beat to windward. So the moment the leading boat tacks he is on port and has no rights on the starboard boats approaching from behind and must keep clear. The following boats do not have to give him room to keep clear since it was his actions that caused them to gain right of way See Rule 15. The counter manoeuvres for the leading boat in this case are a) to overstand the mark slightly and approach close by so boat(s) behind cannot gain an overlap. At the mark luff up hard to round out of the way of the following boats; or b) as suggested earlier slow up inside the 3 boat lengths to force following boats to go ouside. Option a) is by far the safest option as option b) can lead to pile ups and arguments about overlaps which may involve you even though you may be in the right. I've been there. |
||||
Jimbob
|
||||
![]() |
||||
gordon ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 07 Sep 04 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1037 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
Jim C I would agree with you. When a windward boat is overlapped on the
inside, of another boat, from the moment one of them enters the zone,
the outside boat must give the inside boat mark room. From that moment,
markroom includes room to sail to the mark (which limits the leeward
boats rights under rule 11) and room at the mark to sail her proper
course, including room to tack.
As I read the rules, the fact that once inside windward boat passes head to wind rule 18 switches off, and at that moment, but not before, outside boat ceases to have an obligation to give mark room (until she herself passes head to wind at which time a new set of rule 18 obligations arise) does nothing to change, or reduce, the obligation of the outside boat to give mark room whilst boats are still on same tack. If the inside boat infringes rule 13 while passing from head to wind to a closehauled course this will (except in the most exceptional circumstances) be due to the outside boat not giving enough mark room before inside boat passes head to wind. If the answer to the question "Just before the inside boat passes head to wind does she have room to tack" is No then outside boat has infringed. Gordon |
||||
Gordon
|
||||
![]() |
||||
JimC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6661 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
Lets remind ourselves of the definition of mark room...
Mark-Room - Room for a boat to sail to the mark, and then room to sail her proper course while at the mark. However, mark-room does not include room to tack unless the boat is overlapped to windward and on the inside of the boat required to give mark-room. Which to my mind is exactly the same as saying "mark room includes room to tack if the boat is overlapped to windward and on the inside". It seems clear enough to my simple mind. Are you sure you aren't struggling for more subtlety in the words than is really there? I can remember, as a PC member, once doing exactly that and managing to talk ourselves into an interpretation of a rule (forget which one) which was precisely wrong. Fortunately the competetitor wasn't party to the discussion and retired after hearing the evidence and re-reading the rules whilst we were leading ourselves down the garden path! Edited by JimC |
||||
![]() |
||||
Brass ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 24 Mar 08 Location: Australia Online Status: Offline Posts: 1151 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
I do apologise: it's Case 15, not Case 50. |
||||
![]() |
||||
gordon ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 07 Sep 04 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1037 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
Brass,
To avoid confusing sailors by our arguments I suggest we do what most judges do when they have different interpretations - we adjourn to a quiet corner of the bar, discuss the matter and come back with a considered answer. I will contact you directly, and promise to return to this thread with a considered answer One point, you seem to be quoting a Case, but it is not Case 50 in my Case book - could you check the reference. Gordon |
||||
Gordon
|
||||
![]() |
||||
ChrisJ ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() Joined: 07 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 337 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
Location: Australia
|
||||
![]() |
||||
tack'ho ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 08 Feb 06 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1100 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
mmmmmm....really? |
||||
I might be sailing it, but it's still sh**e!
|
||||
![]() |
||||
ColPrice2002 ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() Joined: 25 Nov 08 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 222 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
Consider the situation as if the mark were not there:- If IW heads up to close hauled, then OW heads up to close hauled as well, then IF IW cannot tack because the stern swing would hit OW, then OW has not given IW sufficient time or space to keep clear (Rule 16). Otherwise, IW could be put in the impossible position of a) not being able to tack because of OW and b) [possibly] sailing a lower close hauled course. It isn't possible to establish an overlap from leeward without allowing the give-way boat to keep clear (Rule 17). Colin |
||||
![]() |
||||
Brass ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 24 Mar 08 Location: Australia Online Status: Offline Posts: 1151 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
I have to disagree with you Gordon. There is no longer any express entitlement to room to tack as part of rounding a mark. The new definition of mark-room just tells us when mark-room does not include room to tack. At a windward mark, with two boats initially on same tack, rule 18.1(b) switches off rule 18 in its entirity when one boat passes head to wind so that 'boats [are] on opposite tacks [and] the proper course for one, but not both is to tack.' So all mark-room entitlements disappear when one of the two boats passes head to wind. See Case 50, last paragraph: "If A were to pass head to wind, then at that moment all parts of rule 18 would cease to apply because the boats would be on opposite tacks (see rule 18.1(b))."
Disagree: once inside passes head to wind the whole of rule 18 is off
Agree rule 18.5 never switches rule 14 off.
Agree, rule 18 is back ON from when she passes head to wind.
Edited by Brass |
||||
![]() |
||||
mtoogood ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: 05 May 09 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 2 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
thanks gordon - admirably simple and i am sure correct!
|
||||
solent scow sailor
|
||||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 123> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |