3 boats length |
Post Reply
|
Page 12> |
| Author | ||
fudheid
Far too distracted from work
Joined: 21 Apr 11 Location: 51.53 N 01.28 E Online Status: Offline Posts: 241 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Topic: 3 boats lengthPosted: 23 Feb 16 at 1:28pm |
|
|
this happened at a classic reggata last year we sailed a tumalare (smallest boat in the fleet) and at the leeward mark the largest and quickest barged the mark after we clearly stated they had no water.. we were at inside our 3 boat length, but the team of pro sailors shouted us down and with boats of significant value they don't get too close.
They helicoptered off before we could have a friendly chat in the bar.....so they didn't get any friendly advice from the victors
![]() Moral of the story is that in boats of vastly differing lengths (i think the difference we had was 40ft) and vastly different speeds, it is very hard to distinguish a boat at 60ft when they hit their 3 boat zone). |
||
|
Cheers you
only me from over the sea...... |
||
![]() |
||
JimC
Really should get out more
Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 30 Jan 16 at 11:20pm |
|
|
I got a opinion on retractable bowsprits normal position and overlaps from the RYA a few years ago when it was a bit more of a live issue.
|
||
![]() |
||
Brass
Really should get out more
Joined: 24 Mar 08 Location: Australia Online Status: Offline Posts: 1151 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 30 Jan 16 at 10:15pm |
|
There is no reason why 'The rule must be the same as for finishing'. Rule 18 and the Definition of Finish are absolutely different.
|
||
![]() |
||
Presuming Ed
Really should get out more
Joined: 26 Feb 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 641 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 30 Jan 16 at 9:31pm |
|
|
Has anybody actually read the Q&A?
|
||
![]() |
||
Rupert
Really should get out more
Joined: 11 Aug 04 Location: Whitefriars sc Online Status: Offline Posts: 8956 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 30 Jan 16 at 7:34pm |
|
The 2nd 70 footer would have rights as overlapped boat when the 1st 70 footer gains the overlap, just as 3 boats the same length would work. |
||
|
Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686
|
||
![]() |
||
JimC
Really should get out more
Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 30 Jan 16 at 7:08pm |
|
|
The zone operates between any two boats, So there is a zone for the 20 footer and the 70 footer, and a zone for the two 70 footers.
Seems to me that an overlap that changed between 210 and 60 feet would most most likely fall foul of the last point of certainty rule anyway. |
||
![]() |
||
andymck
Far too distracted from work
Joined: 15 Dec 06 Location: Stamford Online Status: Offline Posts: 397 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 30 Jan 16 at 6:50pm |
|
|
What if at 210 feet no one is overlapped. But by 60 feet they are all overlapped.
Does the new zone reset rule 18? Or are there in fact still 2 hypothetical zones? |
||
|
Andy Mck
|
||
![]() |
||
Rupert
Really should get out more
Joined: 11 Aug 04 Location: Whitefriars sc Online Status: Offline Posts: 8956 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 30 Jan 16 at 3:27pm |
|
|
The 20 footer has to give room to both 70 footers if the overlap is gained in time, as the 2nd 70 footer is overlapped, and therefore has rights, even though not in the zone. No different to 3 20 footers, except on a practical level for the poor b**tard in the 20 footer. That the 2nd 70 footer already had rights on the 1st one doesn't make a difference, as far as I can see, whether the 20 footer is overlapped or not. Either both or neither have rights.
|
||
|
Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686
|
||
![]() |
||
JimC
Really should get out more
Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 30 Jan 16 at 1:30pm |
|
|
It means that the first 70 footer is in the zone relative to the second 70 footer 10 ft before it is in the zone relative to the 20 footer. But what situation to you envisage where this causes a problem?
|
||
![]() |
||
andymck
Far too distracted from work
Joined: 15 Dec 06 Location: Stamford Online Status: Offline Posts: 397 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 30 Jan 16 at 12:24pm |
|
|
The definition of the zone and 18.1 do make this a potentially hazardous enterprise. Imagine 2 70 footers with a 20 footer in front of them.
Does the zone change once one of them gains an overlap on the 20 footer as they reach their one boat length or does the previous zone still apply? When Rule 18 Applies Rule 18 applies between boats when they are required to leave a mark on the same side and at least one of them is in the zone. However, it does not apply between boats on opposite tacks on a beat to windward, between boats on opposite tacks when the proper course at the mark for one but not both of them is to tack, between a boat approaching a mark and one leaving it, or if the mark is a continuing obstruction, in which case rule 19 applies. |
||
|
Andy Mck
|
||
![]() |
||
Post Reply
|
Page 12> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |