New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: Proper Course
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Proper Course

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
jeffers View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 29 Mar 04
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3048
Post Options Post Options   Quote jeffers Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Proper Course
    Posted: 16 Nov 15 at 7:00am
Originally posted by Quagers


On a reach the proper course for almost all boats is a straight line to the next mark.

Definitely not true. I can assure that the boat that gets the gust first will usually get to the next mark first. this will involve changing course to meet it and then changing course once they are in it.
Paul
----------------------
D-Zero GBR 74
Back to Top
NickM View Drop Down
Far too distracted from work
Far too distracted from work


Joined: 27 May 09
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 328
Post Options Post Options   Quote NickM Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 Nov 15 at 10:45pm
DIV]
On a reach the proper course for almost all boats is a straight line to the next mark.
[/QUOTE]

On windy reaches, even in a una rig single hander, you may have to head up in the lulls so as to be able to bear off to avoid being overpowered in the gusts.
Back to Top
Brass View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 24 Mar 08
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1151
Post Options Post Options   Quote Brass Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 Nov 15 at 10:18pm
Originally posted by JimC

Originally posted by rich96

So even though Boat B is coming from astern and sailing above the heading for the mark its Boat A's responsibility to keep clear ?


Exactly so. There is no "overtaking boat" concept in the rules.
A windward boat must nearly always let a leeward boat sail where it wants. The main limitation is that if the leeward boat comes from behind then she may not sail above a proper course.  

Further, right of way rules operate independently of rule 17.  As long as there was room for W to keep clear, whether or not L broke rule 17 does not affect whether W kept clear, and L, if she broke rule 17, cannot be said to have compelled W to break rule 11 as a consequence of L breaking rule 17, so W cannot be exonerated for breaking rule 11 under rule 64.1( a ).


Back to Top
Brass View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 24 Mar 08
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1151
Post Options Post Options   Quote Brass Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 Nov 15 at 10:13pm
Originally posted by Presuming Ed

Originally posted by Brass

There's that word again.

Why may leeward not luff change course towards the wind to respond to a windshift, or even if she reasonably decides that she is not sailing a hot enough angle?

Luff? What's wrong with luff? It's a clearly defined verb (OED "Steer (a yacht) nearer the wind") that occurs 3 times in the RRS, 109 times in the case book, a further 9 times in the supplement to the cae book,11 times in the current Q&A booklet, 112 times in the TR call book, 6 more times in the current TR supplement, 5 times in current TR Q&As, 80 times in the MR call book, 9 times in the current MR supplement, once (in the title/abstract) of the only current MR Q&A, and three times in the blind match racing rules

In what way is "changed course towards the wind" better than "luffed", a clearly understood, long standing piece of sailing terminology?

What's wrong with it is that, in its 'nautical use' demonstrated by numerous posters in rules threads, the verb 'to luff' has a multiplicity of meanings with various qualifications, such as a change of course:
  • abruptly, intended to cause a windward boat to break rule 11;
  • that causes a windward boat to respond;
  • above a boat's proper course;
  • above a boat's close hauled course.
Notwithstanding your content analysis of various sources, I would point out that the racing rules applicable to fleet racing only use the word 'luff' as a noun meaning a part of a sail.

I remain convinced that rules discussions would be better off without using the term.
Back to Top
Presuming Ed View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 26 Feb 05
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 641
Post Options Post Options   Quote Presuming Ed Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 Nov 15 at 11:59am
On a run
Position 1. 

Blue is clear ahead, RoW. Yellow is clear astern. 
Yellow must keep clear (RRS 12). 
Blue must give yellow room to keep clear when she changes course (RRS 16.1). (*)
(Both should avoid contact - RRS 14). 

Position 2. 
Blue is overlapped to windward of Yellow. 
Blue, as a windward boat, must keep clear of Yellow (RRS 11). 
Yellow has acquired RoW by becoming overlapped to leeward of blue. She must therefore initially give Blue room to keep clear. (RRS15)
When yellow changes course, she must give blue room to keep clear (RRS16.1). (*)
Yellow has become overlapped to leeward of blue within 2 of her hull lengths. She should therefore not  sail above her proper course while they remain on the same tack and overlapped within that distance, unless in doing so she promptly sails astern of blue. 
(Both boats should avoid contact). 

Proper course is defined as "Proper Course A course a boat would sail to finish as soon as possible in the absence of the other boats referred to in the rule using the term. A boat has no proper course before her starting signal."

*( No course changes in this scenario to bring 16.1 into action). 



On a reach 

All the same points as above apply. So again, yellow should not sail higher than her proper course while she's overlapped with blue (unless she sails astern). 

Note, however, that Yellow's proper course in this scenario does not include luffing as a result of blue's wind shadow (the other boat referred to in the rule (17)). 








Edited by Presuming Ed - 15 Nov 15 at 12:03pm
Back to Top
JimC View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 17 May 04
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6661
Post Options Post Options   Quote JimC Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 Nov 15 at 11:56am
Originally posted by Quagers

On a reach the proper course for almost all boats is a straight line to the next mark.

Strongly disagree. In a high performance spinnaker boat there will be two optimum points of sailing, a max speed two sail reach speed and a max speed 3 sail reach speed.

The difference between the optimum and other points of sailing is so great (at least in planing conditions) that you should always sail on them. So given a reach which is not at one of those angles the fastest and therefore a proper course is to sail part of it without the kite at optimum two sail speed, and part of it with the kite at optimum 3 sail speed.

The only fly in the ointment is that handling the boat at optimum two sail speed may be rather difficult!

The thing is that normally a boat doing this will not meet a boat sailing the rhumb line, since you will either want to postpone the hoist and go high, then chuck the kite up and go down, or else fly the kite and go low, then two sail up to the mark. Its only if something goes wrong, as per previous post, that the proper courses will intersect.

Edited by JimC - 15 Nov 15 at 12:02pm
Back to Top
Quagers View Drop Down
Far too distracted from work
Far too distracted from work
Avatar

Joined: 24 Oct 06
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 279
Post Options Post Options   Quote Quagers Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 Nov 15 at 11:45am
They are allowed to sail their proper course, for many boats dead down wind that is not pointing straight at the mark.

On a reach the proper course for almost all boats is a straight line to the next mark.
Back to Top
JimC View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 17 May 04
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6661
Post Options Post Options   Quote JimC Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 Nov 15 at 11:43am
Originally posted by rich96

So even though Boat B is coming from astern and sailing above the heading for the mark its Boat A's responsibility to keep clear ?


Exactly so. There is no "overtaking boat" concept in the rules.
A windward boat must nearly always let a leeward boat sail where it wants. The main limitation is that if the leeward boat comes from behind then she may not sail above a proper course.

And exactly the same applies on a reach. If a kite boat goes round the mark, chucks the kite up and gets blown way down by a big gust it would be a perfectly reasonable proper course to drop the kite and two sail reach well above the direct line between the marks in order to hoist the kite again before the next mark. If whilst doing this her course intersects with a windward boat sailing a straight line then the boat sailing a straight line must keep clear.

Edited by JimC - 15 Nov 15 at 11:44am
Back to Top
rich96 View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 20 Jan 05
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 596
Post Options Post Options   Quote rich96 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 Nov 15 at 11:09am
So even though Boat B is coming from astern and sailing above the heading for the mark its Boat A's responsibility to keep clear ?

How does this vary from a reach if Boat B was coming from astern and to leeward - at what point can they start asking A to head
Back to Top
Presuming Ed View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 26 Feb 05
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 641
Post Options Post Options   Quote Presuming Ed Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 Nov 15 at 10:26am
Originally posted by Brass

There's that word again.

Why may leeward not luff change course towards the wind to respond to a windshift, or even if she reasonably decides that she is not sailing a hot enough angle?

Luff? What's wrong with luff? It's a clearly defined verb (OED "Steer (a yacht) nearer the wind") that occurs 3 times in the RRS, 109 times in the case book, a further 9 times in the supplement to the cae book,11 times in the current Q&A booklet, 112 times in the TR call book, 6 more times in the current TR supplement, 5 times in current TR Q&As, 80 times in the MR call book, 9 times in the current MR supplement, once (in the title/abstract) of the only current MR Q&A, and three times in the blind match racing rules

In what way is "changed course towards the wind" better than "luffed", a clearly understood, long standing piece of sailing terminology?


Edited by Presuming Ed - 15 Nov 15 at 10:49am
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.665y
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz
Change your personal settings, or read our privacy policy