Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
Laser 161752 Tynemouth |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
Alternative to a Contender |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 123 4> |
Author | |
Lukepiewalker ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 24 May 06 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1341 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 23 May 15 at 11:17pm |
Balance is everything with a trolley, you don't want to be wasting energy lifting the weight of the boat when you could more usefully use it to pull the thing.
|
|
Ex-Finn GBR533 "Pie Hard"
Ex-National 12 3253 "Seawitch" Ex-National 12 2961 "Curved Air" Ex-Mirror 59096 "Voodoo Chile" |
|
![]() |
|
Riv ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() Joined: 23 Nov 13 Location: South Devon Online Status: Offline Posts: 353 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Don't kow what's wrongwith an L2.
Just got one and looking forward to doing it single handed as that's what I've got it for. Haven't sailed one since the early 80's but was a blast then and now should be a good laugh. I think the Laser Vargo? has a vid about self tacking jib mod that I was going to try. I'll wack a fully centre main on it rake the mast back as far as I can and see how it goes. Lovely hull, Bethwaite bow, cheap'n cheerful single hander. Contender lovely boat.......heavy boats need excellent trolleys, correct proportions so you can pull well, good hand grips and roller bearings in the hubs...seriously makes a massive difference. My latest wheel barrrow has roller bearings and the difference over a standard one when loaded with soil is huge |
|
![]() |
|
JimC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
As you can tell from the huge fleets round the world... |
|
![]() |
|
boatshed ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() Joined: 12 Apr 05 Online Status: Offline Posts: 457 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I take your point about the Int 14 but that is a high performance development class and as such the aim is just to make them quicker. The hulls will continue to change. I'm more interested in taking a moderate performance boat that is reasonably light and has a reasonable planing hull. The trapeze addition is more about having to avoid hiking for long beats. At the end of the day, this is what a Contender is and a lot of the time down wind they are not on the wire but sat comfortably on the side deck. Not much different from putting a trapeze on an Enterprise. The 59er seemed to benefit from the crew being on the wore and that was designed as a hiking boat. TT I mentioned the Blaze Halo boat and it is too wide with the tubes. I would get rid of them |
|
Steve
|
|
![]() |
|
JimC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I'm sure Farr could scale up the 3.7 config for bigger sailors, whether I could do it first time would be another matter. But the proportions would be significantly different. It would certainly need to be longer and quite possibly thinner. With what we can do now with construction and weight maybe a bit less freeboard but possibly vestigial wings to maintain separation of feet from wake.
Probably wouldn't be a country mile away from the RS600. To destodge the Contender, well, you'd be reducing the weight a lot so the rocker line probably should change, and then with what we know now it would probably be good to have chines aft at least. And then that rig is so much of its era, for sure that would need to change completely. A bit more freeboard would do no harm either as a trapezing platform, or maybe little winglets to get the ankles a bit more away from the waves. Probably wouldn't be a country mile away from the RS600. But if one wanted a nice modern singlehander it might be interesting to buy Clive a lot of pints and get him involved in a conversation about what he'd do if designing a boat to the spec with what he knows now. Probably have some appreciable improvements on the RS600... Edited by JimC - 23 May 15 at 12:33pm |
|
![]() |
|
turnturtle ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 05 Dec 14 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2538 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In your opinion, could the Farr 3.7 'scale up' for bigger sailors? Or would you be better looking to 'de-stodge' a contender?
|
|
![]() |
|
JimC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Just sticking an extra wire on a boat designed without it rarely works well. Much better off to have a boat designed for the job from scratch.
I well remember Paul Bieker saying of 14s "everyone said two strings would be a cheap way to go faster, then we all got to chuck our hulls". A great boat will have hull shape, displacement, rig, righting moment all working in harmony. Change one without the matching change in the rest and at best you'll have a mediocre boat. Frankenboats can be great fun to assemble, and a giggle when conditions are right, but rarely something you'd want to get up every Sunday morning to sail. |
|
![]() |
|
turnturtle ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 05 Dec 14 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2538 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
the blaze would have way too much RM with racks and wires.... Phantom is the best donor hull for the duck pond imho. Whack a square top sail on it and get another 2m of sail area ;-)
|
|
![]() |
|
boatshed ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() Joined: 12 Apr 05 Online Status: Offline Posts: 457 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I'm not suggesting tampering with the Contender. They seem to be doing. Although the style of boat interests me, I won't get another one.
I'm not interested in a Laser II. I would like a bigger person's version of a Farr 3.7 which is why I suggested putting a trapeze on a Phantom. Maybe even sticking Halo rig on a Phantom with a trapeze. 11.5 sq.m sail on a Phantom would be pretty close to a bigger persons Farr 3.7. Unless the hull shape is all wrong. Maybe that Hadron boat with a double bottom would do also be a suitable hull |
|
Steve
|
|
![]() |
|
PeterG ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 12 Jan 08 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 822 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Even if you are reasonably fit and 85kg, you don't want to be hauling a Contender, at about 100kg (all up), up the slip. You will get a slipped disc and need a doctor.
I'm reasonably unfit, and about 74kg. Never had to see a doctor about a slipped disc in 7 years of hauling a Contender up a slipway. Sure you could probably produce a Contender at a 20 kg less, perhaps more if you were prepared to spend more or to accept a shorter competitive life. But it's not hard to see why there's little enthusiasm in the class - it remains great to sail and fairly successful, can still pull out 50 entries at the Nationals in a good year - not bad for a 45 year old boat with a fairly narrow target group. Plus one of the things the Contender excels at is good winds at sea - conditions in which the weight is generally an advantage.
Edited by PeterG - 22 May 15 at 11:00pm |
|
Peter
Ex Cont 707 Ex Laser 189635 DY 59 |
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 123 4> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |