New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: Alternative to a Contender
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Alternative to a Contender

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 4>
Author
Lukepiewalker View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 24 May 06
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1341
Post Options Post Options   Quote Lukepiewalker Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Alternative to a Contender
    Posted: 23 May 15 at 11:17pm
Balance is everything with a trolley, you don't want to be wasting energy lifting the weight of the boat when you could more usefully use it to pull the thing.
Ex-Finn GBR533 "Pie Hard"
Ex-National 12 3253 "Seawitch"
Ex-National 12 2961 "Curved Air"
Ex-Mirror 59096 "Voodoo Chile"
Back to Top
Riv View Drop Down
Far too distracted from work
Far too distracted from work


Joined: 23 Nov 13
Location: South Devon
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 353
Post Options Post Options   Quote Riv Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 May 15 at 7:01pm
Don't kow what's wrongwith an L2.

Just got one and looking forward to doing it single handed as that's what I've got it for. Haven't sailed one since the early 80's but was a blast then and now should be a good laugh.

I think the Laser Vargo? has a vid about self tacking jib mod that I was going to try.

I'll wack a fully centre main on it rake the mast back as far as I can and see how it goes. Lovely hull, Bethwaite bow, cheap'n cheerful single hander.

Contender lovely boat.......heavy boats need excellent trolleys, correct proportions so you can pull well, good hand grips and roller bearings in the hubs...seriously makes a massive difference. My latest wheel barrrow has roller bearings and the difference over a standard one when loaded with soil is huge
Back to Top
JimC View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 17 May 04
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6662
Post Options Post Options   Quote JimC Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 May 15 at 2:24pm
Originally posted by boatshed

The 59er seemed to benefit from the crew being on the wire


As you can tell from the huge fleets round the world...
Back to Top
boatshed View Drop Down
Far too distracted from work
Far too distracted from work


Joined: 12 Apr 05
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 457
Post Options Post Options   Quote boatshed Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 May 15 at 1:02pm
Originally posted by JimC

Just sticking an extra wire on a boat designed without it rarely works well. Much better off to have a boat designed for the job from scratch.

I well remember Paul Bieker saying of 14s "everyone said two strings would be a cheap way to go faster, then we all got to chuck our hulls".

A great boat will have hull shape, displacement, rig, righting moment all working in harmony. Change one without the matching change in the rest and at best you'll have a mediocre boat.
Frankenboats can be great fun to assemble, and a giggle when conditions are right, but rarely something you'd want to get up every Sunday morning to sail.


I take your point about the Int 14 but that is a high performance  development class and as such the aim is just to make them quicker.  The hulls will continue to change.    I'm more interested in taking a moderate performance boat that is reasonably light and has a reasonable planing hull.   The trapeze addition is more about having to avoid hiking for long beats.   At the end of the day, this is what a Contender is and a lot of the time down wind they are not on the wire but sat comfortably on the side deck.   

Not much different from putting a trapeze on an Enterprise.    The 59er seemed to benefit from the crew being on the wore and that was designed as a hiking boat.

TT  I mentioned the Blaze Halo boat and it is too wide with the tubes.   I would get rid of them
Steve
Back to Top
JimC View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 17 May 04
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6662
Post Options Post Options   Quote JimC Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 May 15 at 12:32pm
I'm sure Farr could scale up the 3.7 config for bigger sailors, whether I could do it first time would be another matter. But the proportions would be significantly different. It would certainly need to be longer and quite possibly thinner. With what we can do now with construction and weight maybe a bit less freeboard but possibly vestigial wings to maintain separation of feet from wake.
Probably wouldn't be a country mile away from the RS600.

To destodge the Contender, well, you'd be reducing the weight a lot so the rocker line probably should change, and then with what we know now it would probably be good to have chines aft at least. And then that rig is so much of its era, for sure that would need to change completely. A bit more freeboard would do no harm either as a trapezing platform, or maybe little winglets to get the ankles a bit more away from the waves.
Probably wouldn't be a country mile away from the RS600.

But if one wanted a nice modern singlehander it might be interesting to buy Clive a lot of pints and get him involved in a conversation about what he'd do if designing a boat to the spec with what he knows now.
Probably have some appreciable improvements on the RS600...

Edited by JimC - 23 May 15 at 12:33pm
Back to Top
turnturtle View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 05 Dec 14
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2538
Post Options Post Options   Quote turnturtle Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 May 15 at 11:40am
In your opinion, could the Farr 3.7 'scale up' for bigger sailors? Or would you be better looking to 'de-stodge' a contender?
Back to Top
JimC View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 17 May 04
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6662
Post Options Post Options   Quote JimC Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 May 15 at 10:52am
Just sticking an extra wire on a boat designed without it rarely works well. Much better off to have a boat designed for the job from scratch.

I well remember Paul Bieker saying of 14s "everyone said two strings would be a cheap way to go faster, then we all got to chuck our hulls".

A great boat will have hull shape, displacement, rig, righting moment all working in harmony. Change one without the matching change in the rest and at best you'll have a mediocre boat.
Frankenboats can be great fun to assemble, and a giggle when conditions are right, but rarely something you'd want to get up every Sunday morning to sail.
Back to Top
turnturtle View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 05 Dec 14
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2538
Post Options Post Options   Quote turnturtle Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 May 15 at 10:36am
the blaze would have way too much RM with racks and wires.... Phantom is the best donor hull for the duck pond imho. Whack a square top sail on it and get another 2m of sail area ;-)
Back to Top
boatshed View Drop Down
Far too distracted from work
Far too distracted from work


Joined: 12 Apr 05
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 457
Post Options Post Options   Quote boatshed Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 May 15 at 10:26am
I'm not suggesting tampering with the Contender.   They seem to be doing.  Although the style of boat interests me, I won't get another one.

I'm not interested in a  Laser II.  I would like a bigger person's version of a Farr 3.7 which is why I suggested putting a trapeze on a Phantom.  Maybe even sticking Halo rig on a Phantom with a trapeze.  11.5 sq.m sail on a Phantom would be pretty close to a bigger persons Farr 3.7.    Unless the hull shape is all wrong.

Maybe that Hadron boat with a double bottom would do also be a suitable hull
Steve
Back to Top
PeterG View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 12 Jan 08
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 822
Post Options Post Options   Quote PeterG Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22 May 15 at 11:00pm
Even if you are reasonably fit and 85kg, you don't want to be hauling a Contender, at about 100kg (all up), up the slip.   You will get a slipped disc and need a doctor.

I'm reasonably unfit, and about 74kg. Never had to see a doctor about a slipped disc in 7 years of hauling a Contender up a slipway. 

Sure you could probably produce a Contender at a 20 kg less, perhaps more if you were prepared to spend more or to accept a shorter competitive life. But it's not hard to see why there's little enthusiasm in the class - it remains great to sail and fairly successful, can still pull out 50 entries at the Nationals in a good year - not bad for a 45 year old boat with a fairly narrow target group. Plus one of the things the Contender excels at is good winds at sea - conditions in which the weight is generally an advantage.


Edited by PeterG - 22 May 15 at 11:00pm
Peter
Ex Cont 707
Ex Laser 189635
DY 59
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 4>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.665y
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz
Change your personal settings, or read our privacy policy