New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: Which takes precedence - 18 or 19?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Which takes precedence - 18 or 19?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>
Author
Presuming Ed View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 26 Feb 05
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 641
Post Options Post Options   Quote Presuming Ed Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Which takes precedence - 18 or 19?
    Posted: 18 Oct 13 at 5:50pm
Originally posted by gordon

So IW(B) must give OW(A) room to pass astern of PL(C) AND room to give  IW(B) mark room! However, because OW(A) must give IW(B) mark room she must also give IW(B) room to meet her obligation to give OW(A) room to pass the obstruction.....

Further thought. Is that meta-room? 
Back to Top
JimC View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 17 May 04
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6662
Post Options Post Options   Quote JimC Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 Oct 13 at 4:36pm
I think you can be as certain as possible that you picked the option that lost you the least time...
Back to Top
flaming View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 04 Oct 11
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 41
Post Options Post Options   Quote flaming Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 Oct 13 at 3:53pm
Thanks all for the contributions, it's been fascinating.  Glad I'm not alone in finding the situation slightly confusing!

I'm now regretting not throwing the flag and asking the question for real.  However, like I said I had other things on my mind at the time and the boats in question weren't in our class.  Frustratingly lost the race by 2s on corrected, and we left way more than that at this mark!  
Back to Top
JimC View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 17 May 04
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6662
Post Options Post Options   Quote JimC Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 Oct 13 at 3:12pm
I just tried drawing it... I get two options. In one OW can spin round in PLs wake and fetch the mark. In that case IW can probably spin round and fetch the mark too, most likely clear astern of OW. I think in that case IW has to carry on sailing past the mark and let OW round first.
However the other option is when OW cannot spin round and make the mark but has to sail past it. At that point it gets so complicated and hypothetical I give up, because they are probably going to end up either tacking in the zone or leaving the zone and R18 will turn off at some unpredictable stage. Up until that stage I think its hard for IW to end up with a requirement to take a penalty, provided they gave room to get past the stern, and very easy for OW to end up with one...
Back to Top
Presuming Ed View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 26 Feb 05
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 641
Post Options Post Options   Quote Presuming Ed Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 Oct 13 at 3:00pm
Originally posted by gordon

So IW(B) must give OW(A) room to pass astern of PL(C) AND room to give  IW(B) mark room! However, because OW(A) must give IW(B) mark room she must also give IW(B) room to meet her obligation to give OW(A) room to pass the obstruction.....

We know that they know that we know that they know he's a spy. But we don't know if we know that they know that we know that they know that we know....

If there are no possible prompt seamanlike maneuvers that can get both boats behind PL and round the mark....
Back to Top
gordon View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 07 Sep 04
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1037
Post Options Post Options   Quote gordon Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 Oct 13 at 2:17pm
Getting a bit lost in the A,B,C so I will use labels from Case book

Port tack leeward = PL = C
Inside Windward = IW = B (inside boat at the mark)
Outside Windward = OW = A (outside boat at the mark)

I have been thinking about this:

There seems to be a Catch 22 situation, due to the fact that two boats are simultaneously bound by 2 different rules, and the definition of room means that any rights they may have includes each have obligations to give the other boat room to conform to a rule.

 Rule 19 obliges IW (B) to give room to OW (A) to pass astern of PL (C). This room includes room for OW(A) to "meet her obligations under the rules of Part  2 and rule 31 (see definition). OW (A) has an obligation to give IW (B) mark-room under rule 18.2b

So IW(B) must give OW(A) room to pass astern of PL(C) AND room to give  IW(B) mark room! However, because OW(A) must give IW(B) mark room she must also give IW(B) room to meet her obligation to give OW(A) room to pass the obstruction.....

Now try to draw the course each boat must sail meet their obligations.

OW (A) bailing out does simplify life.

Gordon


Gordon
Back to Top
Brass View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 24 Mar 08
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1151
Post Options Post Options   Quote Brass Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 Oct 13 at 12:51pm
Flaming, once you had bailed out to windward, I reckon you would have had a good chance on a rule 19 protest:  you certainly weren't exposed to a rule 18 breach yourself.
 
While PEd's proposition is the fail safe one, from Boat B's point of view, I think it would be more than flesh and blood could stand not to go behind C and head for the mark.
 
In response to A's protest, I would expect B to give evidence that she gave some space between her and C and if A had poked her nose in she was ready to give more, therefore she did not fail to give A room.  She would say, no contact, no failure to give room.
 
The protest hearing would come down to the evidence of A and B about exactly how much space was between B and C and how far away from that space A was, and A, having admitted to being in need of changing trousers while luffing from ddw to htw, is not going to be in a good position to give convincing evidence about looking over his shoulder and assessing, to the foot, how far there was between B and C at various times.
Back to Top
flaming View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 04 Oct 11
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 41
Post Options Post Options   Quote flaming Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 Oct 13 at 10:38am
Originally posted by Presuming Ed

If windward, by taking room at the obstruction, cannot give mark room AND/OR leeward can only get round the mark by not giving room at the obstruction, then AFAICS the only way for both boats to avoid the obstruction and round the mark without either breaking 18 or 19 is for leeward to luff and take both boats across the bows of the obstructing boat. 

(Ceteris Paribus - i.e. both would claim that they the other broke 18/19 if one/both goes behind the boat beating). 

That sounds like good advice.  

I doubt I'll ever see that situation again, but I'll remember that!

The real world situation was also compounded by dropping kites in a fresh breeze, and the resultant less than perfect visibility forward, especially to leeward where the beating boat was coming from.  So I don't think either boat had fully appreciated quite how small the gap was going to be until it was too late to get over the top of the boat beating (which was also a faster boat - making that hard in any case).  Resulting in the bail out and a request for new pants...
Back to Top
Presuming Ed View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 26 Feb 05
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 641
Post Options Post Options   Quote Presuming Ed Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 Oct 13 at 9:58am
If windward, by taking room at the obstruction, cannot give mark room AND/OR leeward can only get round the mark by not giving room at the obstruction, then AFAICS the only way for both boats to avoid the obstruction and round the mark without either breaking 18 or 19 is for leeward to luff and take both boats across the bows of the obstructing boat. 

(Ceteris Paribus - i.e. both would claim that they the other broke 18/19 if one/both goes behind the boat beating). 
Back to Top
flaming View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 04 Oct 11
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 41
Post Options Post Options   Quote flaming Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 Oct 13 at 9:08am
Originally posted by deadrock

Difficult to assess without timings and distances, but 'room and opportunity' (R&O) may come in to play here. If boat C has tacked soon after the mark, boat B has to start taking avoiding action only once boat C has completed her tack. I know we are talking about big boats here, not Lasers (and no, we don't have paint on a Laser) but boat B may have seen the incident developing a fraction before boat A. B is obliged to give room to boat A, even if no hail is made, but if boat C has given B only just enough R&O to get round C's stern, there may not have been enough R&O for B to give A room as well. Additionally Boat B may have had little option but to bear off round C's stern, if the alternative was a sharp luff that would have endangered A &/or C.

C had a bad drop and had gone some way beyond the mark and was beating back up past it.  They'd been on that course for probably 30s.  Quite why they had decided on a course to only just fetch it on port tack I don't know.  So this situation was developing for at least 30s.

In that respect - take away the mark and this was a very simple 19 issue.  But put the mark back and I got a little confused.  
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.665y
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz
Change your personal settings, or read our privacy policy