New Classes Wish List

   Maybe I didn't explain myself properly.  I didn't include a twin string class, cats or symmetric kite boats, because these classes already exist.  I'm not trying to get rid of existing classes, just limit the amount of new ones emerging (and combining some of the smaller,similar, existing ones).  II was thinking that it would be good if the ISO and L4000 (for example - ) measured under the same rule, so they raced together, not seperately.  For a variety of reasons I don't see symmetric kites being commercially viable on new designs and yet they have a speed advantage on non high performance boats.  Hence they would be banned.
If you want a F8 for rugby types, that's fine by me.

Author	Message Share Topic Printable Version Delicious Digg Facebook Furl Google MySpace Newsvine reddit StumbleUpon Translate Twitter Windows Live Yahoo Bookmarks Topic Search Topic Options Post Reply Create New Topic
Chew my RS Send Private Message Find Member's Posts Visit Member's Homepage Really should get out more Joined: 05 Oct 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 790	Post Options Post Reply Quote Chew my RS Report Post Quote Reply Topic: New Classes Wish List Posted: 04 Oct 06 at 7:56pm
	Maybe I didn't explain myself properly. I didn't include a twin string class, cats or symmetric kite boats, because these classes already exist. I'm not trying to get rid of existing classes, just limit the amount of new ones emerging (and combining some of the smaller,similar, existing ones). II was thinking that it would be good if the ISO and L4000 (for example - ) measured under the same rule, so they raced together, not seperately. For a variety of reasons I don't see symmetric kites being commercially viable on new designs and yet they have a speed advantage on non high performance boats. Hence they would be banned. If you want a F8 for rugby types, that's fine by me.