Uninvented classes |
Post Reply
|
Page <1 7891011 12> |
| Author | |||
Chris 249
Really should get out more
Joined: 10 May 04 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2041 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Topic: Uninvented classesPosted: 12 Jan 05 at 5:10am |
||
|
Re DiscoBall's comment "while most people in dev. classes will
have done at least a bit of one design (and often quite a lot) the same
is not always true the other way round."
Surely that is less the fact that OD sailors are anti-development, but the fact that development class boats are so much rarer? When they compose a small minority of the dinghy scene, it's no wonder that fewer people have tried them. I sail & own SMODs, "normal" ODs, development classes, rating and open classes and it seems to me that out here in Australia, and in the UK 'net presence, there's much more "knocking" of ODs by development sailors than the other way around. We've had a couple of articles in the last couple of years here specifically rubbishing OD classes and making snide (or direct) comments against them. Not great salesmanship - especially when, as Disco said, each sort of class is so important to the whole sport. |
|||
![]() |
|||
Matt Jackson
Really should get out more
Joined: 21 Sep 04 Location: Darlington Online Status: Offline Posts: 962 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 12 Jan 05 at 8:07am |
||
|
I guess in part the OD is seen as a common and a lot of those that sail OD's aspire to sail dev classes or at least see the attraction but if you've made the decision to sail dev classes with the added cost and constant updating (contentious? - probably. Accurate? - mostly in my experience) then it's easy to look down on OD sailors and they may even need to justify (to themselves and each other) the route they have taken. I think there is polarisation in both OD and Dev classes though. I agree that there is 'a third way' - the classes whos rules are fixed but allow gradual improvement - I sail one. We have allowed Carbon spars recently and changed the boom dimensions both changes to allow for better supply of these parts and to make the boats nicer to sail rather than give hugely improved performance. |
|||
|
Laser 203001, Harrier (H+) 36
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Granite
Far too distracted from work
Joined: 12 May 04 Location: Scotland Online Status: Offline Posts: 476 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 12 Jan 05 at 1:39pm |
||
|
I used to sail in Lasers and Laser II's and I used to get extermely annoyed by small things on the boats that could be so much better if improved, and even although I now sail a development class boat where the cockpit is designed around me and how I want to sail. however I still remember how irritated I used to be by small things which if alowed to be changed could improve the boats. and I think this feeds back into a lot of my opinions about One Designs. I |
|||
![]() |
|||
DiscoBall
Far too distracted from work
Joined: 03 Jan 05 Online Status: Offline Posts: 305 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 12 Jan 05 at 7:11pm |
||
But if somebody who owned a car they only used for fun in their leisure time and they told you it was a Mondeo you'd think they were not quite right in the head... ![]() 'each sort of class is so important to the whole sport.' yes, but not every last manufacturers design as many are simply taking up space.... 'added cost' maybe in the 14s but fair less concrete an assumption in the other classes, my new 12 will be on the water for less than a 200 'constant updating' actually a more realistic appraisal is that it's cyclical and big performance changes tend to result from rule changes than some mythical ultra expensive design. When dev classes keep evolving within their rules the competitive lifespan is as good as OD. 'there's much more "knocking" of ODs by development sailors than the other way around.' Isn't that because you've got the manufacturers marketing dept to do that for you? Most of it is borne of frustration both at the sheer weight of advertising for ODs, wariness of the long term effects this will have on the sport (as is becoming obvious in so many other areas of life where advertising holds so much influence) and the fact that so often in the dinghy park we have to justify our choice to OD sailors ( Dev class sailors don't generally go up to OD sailors and query their boat choice decisions but the other way round is very common... )
I don't see that knocking the manufacturers is a bad thing, in an ideal
world the sailing press would be less reliant on such advertisers (and
lazy...) and provide a more balanced view of the sport. As they
don't we have to speak out for ourselves and while there are some SMODs
there are others that are purely cynical bandwagon jumping... A
non manufacturers class (dev or OD) is run by its volunteer members in
what they (rightly or wrongly) believe is in the best interests of the
class and the sport a manufacturers class is simply designed and run as
a money making concern and damn the effects on the sport (i.e releasing
competing classes almost every year...) ![]() As for the 'third way', hmm... a bit rose tinted glasses there Matt ,
having sailed in that sort of class I found I was more disadvantaged by
having a boat of similar age/disrepair to my present 12 than in the
dev. arena.Ultimately a bit like arguments over religion it depends whether you want to think for yourself or do as you're told.... Know what I prefer.... |
|||
![]() |
|||
DiscoBall
Far too distracted from work
Joined: 03 Jan 05 Online Status: Offline Posts: 305 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 12 Jan 05 at 7:23pm |
||
|
Whoops, didn't realise it was that long... Not again...Sorry
!
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Lucy Lee
Far too distracted from work
Joined: 17 Mar 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 276 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 12 Jan 05 at 8:34pm |
||
|
|
|||
|
Fly Cherub!
|
|||
![]() |
|||
DiscoBall
Far too distracted from work
Joined: 03 Jan 05 Online Status: Offline Posts: 305 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 12 Jan 05 at 9:03pm |
||
And so dis-enfrachised those of your fleet who have older boats (by dint of the fact that the carbon rig is worth more that their whole boat and provides a significant performance boost especially to a type of boat that's really aimed at lumpy sea sailing)... And you had to change the rules to allow the carbon rigs? No? Or have you only just realised you could use them within your present rules, a little slow on the uptake then..? ![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
Chris 249
Really should get out more
Joined: 10 May 04 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2041 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 Jan 05 at 6:41am |
||
|
Disco, do your good comments like "Dev class sailors don't generally go up to OD sailors and
query their boat choice decisions" fit with your finale "it depends whether you
want to think for yourself or do as you're told...."????
I know I do as much thinking for myself in the SMODs I sail as in the development classes I sail. It's just that in the SMOD, I think of my own training, trimming and tactical techniques whereas in the development classes I tend to think "hmmmm, where will I put that cleat? or "will I try a novel kite setup" and "hmmmm, how will I afford to update my spars or boat to carbon.....". I'm sure the same thing applies to many others. Same amount of thought, different directions. |
|||
![]() |
|||
Matt Jackson
Really should get out more
Joined: 21 Sep 04 Location: Darlington Online Status: Offline Posts: 962 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 Jan 05 at 8:17am |
||
Blah, blah, blah! I think maybe you should talk about things you have some knowledge about. We had to change the rules to allow a larger boom section which was a prerequisite to using carbon sections and we had to (progressively) reduce the mast weight to make it possible to use Carbon masts. The biggest driver for allowing Carbon masts was that the fleet standard (in the UK and most of europe) mast was not going to be available any more in alloy and as the fleet standard sail was designed to fit it Carbon was a sensible approach VOTED FOR BY THE FLEET. Is this the same dis-infranchised fleet which saw it's biggest ever turnout at a world champs and has had a steady 50+ turnout at it's nationals for the last seven years? |
|||
|
Laser 203001, Harrier (H+) 36
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Contender443
Really should get out more
Joined: 01 Oct 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1211 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 Jan 05 at 11:11am |
||
|
Well said Matt I was considering my response to that posting. I had an alloy mast on my old Contender (which is for sale if anyone is interested) and I did not feel dis-enfrachised. And there are plenty of alloy masts still attending open meetings, nationals, worlds etc. |
|||
|
Bonnie Lass Contender 1764
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Post Reply
|
Page <1 7891011 12> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |