Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
Class Redevelopment |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 23456> |
Author | ||
les5269 ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 11 Oct 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1530 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 23 Dec 05 at 8:59pm |
|
If you want a faster boat buy one the 4s a great boat as it is
![]() |
||
49er 531 & 5000 5025 and a mirror(now gone to mirror heaven)!
Grafham water Sailing Club The greatest inland sailing in the country |
||
![]() |
||
49erGBR735HSC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 30 Mar 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1991 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
You could even buy a 5000, still faster on PY than the 14 (doubt it in practice though), big sail area, twin strings and other boats to race against...........get money back off selling a 4000 and buying a 5000 too. |
||
![]() |
||
BBSCFaithfull ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 06 Dec 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1251 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Indeed they do look like fantastic boats and very cheap to run and maintain. Im sorry for getting all the Forumites panties in a twist but they should lighten up a bit. All i was trying to get across was the idea of what the boat could be. I supose this is what cherub sailors try to do. I think everybody should lighten up a bit!!
Cheers, Alex. |
||
Greatfully Sponsored By
www.allgoodfun.com Int 14 GBR 1503!! |
||
![]() |
||
Wave Rider ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 27 Oct 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 909 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Friggin Hell, the 2005 rules Cherub's are lightning, at the final fling in Plymouth, the 1999 Cherub 'norwegian blue' was killing laser 4k's and that hasn't even got the big rig on! Trust me, if you sail a cherub, even a small rig one, they absolutely feel lightning quick and i imagine the 2005 rules would scare the s*** out of you with all that rig on 12 feet and a 50kg hull (yes...really..50kg), look at the pictures of them leaving the water completely. The PY is extremely gnerous and takes into account the diffrent rig sizes and the PY is not lowered because the class is small so the RYA does not get many returns from clubs asking for it to be lowered dramatically. If you want to mod a boat...get a boat which is meant to be modded! My facts are entirely based on my own opinion and do not represent anyone else from the cherub class's opinions. |
||
-[Franko]-
Chew Valley Lake Sailing Club RS600 933 |
||
![]() |
||
49erGBR735HSC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 30 Mar 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1991 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Still good to be creative though. Development within the 4000 class may be beneficial for the boat in the future but the best route would be gradual modifications instead of changing the boat completely. Classes like the 49er and B14 have benefited from essential and gradual development, for example the 49er masts went through an evolution process due to the old masts being quite brital, the rudder stocks and gantrys have been developed, the sails shifted manufacturers from North to Neil Pryde and even subtle things like the implementation of turnbuckle shroud tensioners. Another example is the Laser 3000/ V3000, the development of the class has pumped more life back into the class. I'm still undecided if the weight loss of the boat is a good thing or bad thing because it may cause problems for the older boats within the class being overweight. |
||
![]() |
||
49erGBR735HSC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 30 Mar 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1991 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Reckon the PY of the Cherub hasn't been lowered any more because the boat is a rocket ship in plaining mode but in displacement mode, its still a 12foot boat, and not being too long, isn't too quick. Probably the same for the 14, most people reckon the boat is much quicker than the PY rating but the PY compensates for the boat in lighter winds.
|
||
![]() |
||
JimC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I do get fed up with all this development class bashing. Why on earth should a 14 cost any more to run than a 4 tonner. Do you think the sails wear out quicker because its a development boat? Do you think that the blocks wear out faster or the strings fray quicker in the cleats? Sure they cost more to buy, but that's because they're semi custom boats using first class materials. |
||
![]() |
||
kasey3000 ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() ![]() Joined: 06 Apr 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 401 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
SMOD are sometimes more expensive than development classes! ex...I was emailed a price for a new suit of sails for a Cherub from RedEye(please don't quote me on this price as it may have changed since I received it!)....£1400.... A price for SMALLER sails (one of which is cheap dacron instead of mylar/kevlar!) for the Laser4000 is £1725. And the blocks on the 4000 wear out a lot quicker than I've seen on ANY development class(and I've been round a lot!) may I also add..... Development classes are "meant" to be more expensive because of the new hulls being brought out or the new faster suit of sails.....I think it's a load of rubbish! I've replaced more blocks on my SMOD Laser4000 and OD Kestrel in the last 4 years than any of my friends in development classes have....... |
||
49er 908
|
||
![]() |
||
redback ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 16 Mar 04 Location: Tunbridge Wells Online Status: Offline Posts: 1502 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Development classes should be more expensive if you keep up with development. For instance you may need a new hull every 3 or 4 years. Whereas a 9 year old hull is competitive in a 4000. However in truth the manufacturers are trying to make as much as they can and so we find that the sails (for instance) are very expensive. Added to this the manufacturers are keen to get the boats out into the market and sometimes they aren't as well developed as they could be, which means you end up with inadequate blocks and poorly routed controls which need frequent replcement. Look at the Laser. Very expensive sails and using the old blocks the cunningham and kicker needed frequent replacement. Now you can use the XD kits to improve - but at what cost. I also suspect there will be even more Lasers with a hole in the bottom due to the mast drilling its way through becuase its easier to apply even more downward pressure. I've sailed a Cherub - 20 years ago - even then it was fast in a breeze and slow in the light stuff. |
||
![]() |
||
Wave Rider ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 27 Oct 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 909 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Yeah but development classes don't mean you have to buy a new hull every 4 yeears or so, iif you are good enough and have the same sail area, you will still do well!
|
||
-[Franko]-
Chew Valley Lake Sailing Club RS600 933 |
||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 23456> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |