Racing Classes Review |
Post Reply
|
Page <12345 7> |
| Author | |||
Guest
Newbie
Joined: 21 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 0 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Topic: Racing Classes ReviewPosted: 12 Nov 09 at 9:56am |
||
|
Every equipment sport has rules that govern the equipment ... ... for example the UCI has a minimum weight rules on bikes and limits the aero ration of tubes to 3:1 ... plus the wheels have to be the same size ... Many would say that inhibits progress but it also controls costs and creates a level playing field, In sailing we are lucky we have choice ... there are a number of development classes out there which encourage progress and free thinking; why don't you just get into one of those and quit your constant moaning; it's very dull. |
|||
![]() |
|||
JimC
Really should get out more
Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 12 Nov 09 at 10:07am |
||
Might just be happenstance... Be interesting to see what happens next year: you can'tt read too much into a single year. But there is a definite SMOD lifespan of excitement, big initial numbers then a tailing off into slow oblivion. You can see the start of that process with the mad enthusiasm here for this RS100. One thing I would observe though is that long term class lifespan tends to depend more than anything else of the enthusiasm and capability of the Class management. The revival of the Scorpion in recent years is a good example of how that works. Maybe being under the banner of a big manufacturer has disadvantages as well as advantages in that respect?
Please No! In any case it wouldn't help. Complaints would simply be replaced by complaints about the rules being too restrictive. There's a long standing problem you see with people who think that rule changes constitute developnment, whereas in fact they halt it by effectively making everyone start again with what is in reality a new class. Edited by JimC |
|||
![]() |
|||
Guest
Newbie
Joined: 21 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 0 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 12 Nov 09 at 10:35am |
||
|
I personally believe this is the most important element of any class; the equipment is far less significant than the attitudes and enthusiasm of the members and their committee. So if you want your class to thrive ask yourself what you are doing to help that... |
|||
![]() |
|||
Dan Vincent
Groupie
Joined: 21 Nov 07 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 45 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 12 Nov 09 at 12:07pm |
||
|
GRF - I thought you were one of the original proponents and importers of the Kona boards. Isn't that a strict one-design class with rules? And wasn't that a reaction to the difficult to sail Formula Windsurfing racing, by controlling the class with rules you have made a class that is far less about equipment and far more about sailing (a good thing for windsurfing in my opinion) How do you see that evolving in the future? Maybe in the future Kona's will have sold enough to be present at clubs throughout the country (bit like Fireballs and Enterpises now). |
|||
![]() |
|||
getafix
Really should get out more
Joined: 28 Mar 06 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 2143 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 12 Nov 09 at 4:32pm |
||
|
Low-quality drivel from some contibutors I see, this is a bit like A-levels, some bright spark comes up with similar do-do each year about the RCR. Personally, I quite like it, there isn't another listing anywhere else like it I've ever seen and while it's not complete and does include some mistakes, it's the only listing of classes allowing a decent comparison of specs, numbers, class "health" and winners.. we have soooo many classes in the UK that it's probably one of the most thank-less tasks in the Y&Y office putting this together - well done to whoever grasped the nettle this year!
|
|||
|
Feeling sorry for vegans since it became the latest fad to claim you are one
|
|||
![]() |
|||
G.R.F.
Really should get out more
Joined: 10 Aug 08 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 4028 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 12 Nov 09 at 5:17pm |
||
|
I was one of the original proponents of the Windsurfer Class, ran the
class mag that's how it all started. The Windsurfer and the Laser were priced similarly about 500 for the windsurfer 600 for the laser. The windsurfer eventually did evolve, but too late for the evolution of the whole sport. It's not fair to really compare windsurfing with sailing because it became a new diversion in as much as it was more fun to do without rules and strictures of a course so off it went on many tangents. But the Kona I did hope might return racing to club level and indeed am still hopeful of getting a Kona to the dinghy show. But we did have the benefit of Strict One Design AND 'Open Class' and its this I feel is missing. A set of 'box' rules for single handers to develop within. Trap or none trap, then I guess it would get cleaned up by foils and it's already too late... I just see things like the boat I'm using held back because of a myopic view of the class. Had the Blaze kited up last year, or the year before that in fact, when it was first mooted. Would there have been the demand for the 100 for instance and what future will there be for it (the blaze class) for example. Had the MPS not been so rigid, could it have been modified so lightweights could survive in it without turning full time professional. Its lots of little things that class luddism often stifles. Edited by G.R.F. |
|||
![]() |
|||
Guest
Newbie
Joined: 21 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 0 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 12 Nov 09 at 5:29pm |
||
|
No-one in our class is professional Iver is pretty similar to you in weight and has done very well ... if fact many lightweight have no problems. Had you started by modifing your harness so the hook was the right way up you'd have found the hand that was constantly used to hold the hook on quite useful for sailing the boat ... two hands are better than one as it's often useful to be able to adjust the sail trim & steer at the same time. |
|||
![]() |
|||
blaze720
Really should get out more
Joined: 28 Sep 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1635 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 12 Nov 09 at 6:30pm |
||
|
GRF
"if only etc" ..... We made the very valid decision that we were not going to sacrifice the Blaze class and put a spinnaker on it ... There are a majority out there who do not want a spinnaker and that view extends beyond our current owners bar a small minority - and that is where our positioning remains ! - for a host of good reasons both technical and commercial we are not going to leave the simple single sail concept for Blaze/Halo. You may as well ask why the Phantom or Solo or Laser don't 'see the light' as well .... As has been said before we have and are looking at the 2 sail + sit-down segment as it emerges but will not do it with the Blaze hull - but all the Blaze/Halo systems maybe (rig/foils/wings) on a very specific hull we are looking at but not with the current hull. But before that we have other fish to fry of course .... ;-) Mike L. PS - In the meantime I'd go on the 'beer n pasta' now for next year diet with your choice ..... you really need 'proper' wings you know ! |
|||
![]() |
|||
Merlinboy
Really should get out more
Joined: 03 Jul 06 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 3169 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 12 Nov 09 at 6:45pm |
||
|
Grumpf, just give up on the kite on the blaze idea fella! There is no WAY they will admit it should of been developed instead of the bigger rig! Now the 100 and D-one seem to of taken off, admitting we were right and they were wrong ain't going to happen! At least you can shout i told you so when you get a copy of racing classes review next year and look at the like for like sales figures!!
|
|||
![]() |
|||
JimC
Really should get out more
Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 12 Nov 09 at 6:59pm |
||
And what makes you think that the Blaze is suitable for an asymettric? The Blaze is the only survivor of those first generation Topper boats, all the ones with spinnakers are at one with the Norwegian Blue... Do you really think a half ass conversion is going to be as good as a boat designed for the job? |
|||
![]() |
|||
Post Reply
|
Page <12345 7> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |