New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: Has Laser dropped the 4000?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Has Laser dropped the 4000?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 5>
Author
getafix View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 28 Mar 06
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2143
Post Options Post Options   Quote getafix Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Has Laser dropped the 4000?
    Posted: 16 Jun 06 at 1:38pm
we went over and over the "corrected for class racing" debate for 3000s and decided to allow the lighter boats uncorrected ... who'd want to ballast up a flier, it could discourage people from class racing ... we've retained the existing National trophy for "Mk 1" Laser 3000s and have a new overall trophy open to L3Ks and V3000s


Fair point, with the recent proliferation of manufacturer's one designs, there's bound to be drop out of classes that haven't selled as well as others but are still loved by a few - why not go forward with a new builder - it's your chance (V3000, Blaze X) to make a much better boat as an end product and re-vitalise your class.  We're not talking Mirrors, Solos or Oppies here - reasonably radical change isn't going to render thousands of boats 'obsolete' overnight........... be brave and go for it.

L4000 built lighter with carbon wings, better foils, carbon boom and slightly easier running controls would be a NICE boat
Feeling sorry for vegans since it became the latest fad to claim you are one
Back to Top
yellowhammer View Drop Down
Far too distracted from work
Far too distracted from work
Avatar

Joined: 08 May 05
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 270
Post Options Post Options   Quote yellowhammer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 Jun 06 at 12:39pm

Originally posted by 49erGBR735HSC

Say you knock at least about 30kg off the weight of the 4000, add further more weights to the boat for class racing which would complicate issues further, what's to stop people taking all the weights out for club racing and having an unfair advantage.

(hypathetically speaking) a move to a new builder is a not to be missed opportunity for a major update ... the new builder would want to make changes anyway, to suit his facilities, pricing, preferred suppliers, etc, so you can't stay SMOD ... if a weight reduction would significantly improve the boat, i'd say go for it while you can

we went over and over the "corrected for class racing" debate for 3000s and decided to allow the lighter boats uncorrected ... who'd want to ballast up a flier, it could discourage people from class racing ... we've retained the existing National trophy for "Mk 1" Laser 3000s and have a new overall trophy open to L3Ks and V3000s

Back to Top
jeffers View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 29 Mar 04
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3048
Post Options Post Options   Quote jeffers Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 Jun 06 at 8:50am
Originally posted by SymBoy



Mk1 and Mk2? I thought it was a one design. What's the difference?



Mk1 = original Laser 3000 as built by Performance sailcraft, Mk2 = new vandercraft V3000.

Similar to the devlopments in the Blaze fleet arounf 5 years or so ago. It was widely known that the boat was good aside from the rig issues (fully battened main that was a bit of a beast). They worked with Topper to redesign to a semi soft sail which can be feathered. There were other minor changes to the boat (introduction or carbon racks over ally racks and some different rigging options). Aside from that a 'Mk1' Blaze is still as fast as a 'Mk2' (known as the Blaze X).

Changes in a one design boat can be positive as long as the class manages them carefully and gets the association membership involved. Thats why 2nd hand Blazes are like rocking horse droppings and there is a waiting list for new boats.

Paul
Paul
----------------------
D-Zero GBR 74
Back to Top
SymBoy View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 01 Apr 04
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 38
Post Options Post Options   Quote SymBoy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 Jun 06 at 8:39am
Originally posted by yellowhammer

from (little) experience to date, the front runners go for the better performance (lighter) Mk 2 boats, and get top draw racing, but further down the fleet the Mk 2 boats are burried in amongst the Mk 1s ... there's still good racing in the Mk 1s

Mk1 and Mk2? I thought it was a one design. What's the difference?

 

Back to Top
Contender 541 View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 05 Dec 05
Location: Burton on Trent
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1402
Post Options Post Options   Quote Contender 541 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 Jun 06 at 4:52am

There may be strong commercial reasons why the 4k is (apparently) being dropped, like Laser cannot justify it as a self supporting entity (it does not make money and the rest of the range supports it's production)

Has anyone actually asked Laser what they are doing?

When you find a big kettle of crazy it's probably best not to stir it - Pointy Haired Boss

Crew on 505 8780

Back to Top
yellowhammer View Drop Down
Far too distracted from work
Far too distracted from work
Avatar

Joined: 08 May 05
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 270
Post Options Post Options   Quote yellowhammer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 Jun 06 at 10:52pm

from (little) experience to date, the front runners go for the better performance (lighter) Mk 2 boats, and get top draw racing, but further down the fleet the Mk 2 boats are burried in amongst the Mk 1s ... there's still good racing in the Mk 1s

i recon if you can bring the full potential out of a design (balancing performance against longevity) you're on to a long term winner ... settle for second best and you'll be bettered

Back to Top
carshalton fc View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 26 Jan 05
Location: England
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2337
Post Options Post Options   Quote carshalton fc Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 Jun 06 at 9:04pm

yer it would be great to take lots of weight out of the 4000 but it would mess the strong class racing up. if they were going to do anything to it i would love to see a carbon rig and cheaper sails.

 

International 14 1503
Back to Top
m_liddell View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 27 May 05
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 583
Post Options Post Options   Quote m_liddell Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 Jun 06 at 6:35pm
Knocking weight off would mess up the weight equalisation which is why the lighter 800 are/were only semi equalised.
Back to Top
SymBoy View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 01 Apr 04
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 38
Post Options Post Options   Quote SymBoy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 Jun 06 at 6:26pm

Originally posted by 49erGBR735HSC

I'm making my point about not knocking any weight off due to the fact that the 4000 still has a relatively strong class and doesn't need to take that action to generate more interest in the class.

As I recall Laser 2 was in a similar situation when 4000 turned up!

 

 

Back to Top
49erGBR735HSC View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 05
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1991
Post Options Post Options   Quote 49erGBR735HSC Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 Jun 06 at 3:33pm
£6k compared to £8k is still quite a difference. I'm making my point about not knocking any weight off due to the fact that the 4000 still has a relatively strong class and doesn't need to take that action to generate more interest in the class. Say you knock at least about 30kg off the weight of the 4000, add further more weights to the boat for class racing which would complicate issues further, what's to stop people taking all the weights out for club racing and having an unfair advantage. Not all the racing is done on the circuit and it would get down-heartening being stuck behind faster 4000s because they are lighter. I'm playing devil's advocate here because our club used to let us sail 5000s without weights and reckon that if the 5000 went the lighter route as is being suggested, they wouldn't have minded us knocking the correctors out if we had a lighter boat. If we still owned a 5000 and the class was pushing towards lighter boats being built by another builder, forgetting all other facts, the prospect of lighter boats being brought into the class would be enough to push us out into the 49er or I14. You can parallel the same sort of line of thought to Laser 4000 sailors jumping ship from the class to either the RS800 or the 29erXX. Future planning, do you buy a new 4000 which is slightly lighter or buy a faster boat for the same price (second-hand)?

Edited by 49erGBR735HSC
Dennis Watson 49er GBR735
Helensburgh S.C
Boat Insurance from Noble Marine

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 5>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.665y
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz
Change your personal settings, or read our privacy policy