Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
Has Laser dropped the 4000? |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1234 5> |
Author | |
getafix ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 28 Mar 06 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 2143 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 16 Jun 06 at 1:38pm |
we went over and over the "corrected for class racing" debate for 3000s
and decided to allow the lighter boats uncorrected ... who'd want to
ballast up a flier, it could discourage people from class racing ...
we've retained the existing National trophy for "Mk 1" Laser 3000s and
have a new overall trophy open to L3Ks and V3000s
Fair point, with the recent proliferation of manufacturer's one designs, there's bound to be drop out of classes that haven't selled as well as others but are still loved by a few - why not go forward with a new builder - it's your chance (V3000, Blaze X) to make a much better boat as an end product and re-vitalise your class. We're not talking Mirrors, Solos or Oppies here - reasonably radical change isn't going to render thousands of boats 'obsolete' overnight........... be brave and go for it. L4000 built lighter with carbon wings, better foils, carbon boom and slightly easier running controls would be a NICE boat |
|
Feeling sorry for vegans since it became the latest fad to claim you are one
|
|
![]() |
|
yellowhammer ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() Joined: 08 May 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 270 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
(hypathetically speaking) a move to a new builder is a not to be missed opportunity for a major update ... the new builder would want to make changes anyway, to suit his facilities, pricing, preferred suppliers, etc, so you can't stay SMOD ... if a weight reduction would significantly improve the boat, i'd say go for it while you can we went over and over the "corrected for class racing" debate for 3000s and decided to allow the lighter boats uncorrected ... who'd want to ballast up a flier, it could discourage people from class racing ... we've retained the existing National trophy for "Mk 1" Laser 3000s and have a new overall trophy open to L3Ks and V3000s |
|
![]() |
|
jeffers ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 29 Mar 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 3048 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Mk1 = original Laser 3000 as built by Performance sailcraft, Mk2 = new vandercraft V3000. Similar to the devlopments in the Blaze fleet arounf 5 years or so ago. It was widely known that the boat was good aside from the rig issues (fully battened main that was a bit of a beast). They worked with Topper to redesign to a semi soft sail which can be feathered. There were other minor changes to the boat (introduction or carbon racks over ally racks and some different rigging options). Aside from that a 'Mk1' Blaze is still as fast as a 'Mk2' (known as the Blaze X). Changes in a one design boat can be positive as long as the class manages them carefully and gets the association membership involved. Thats why 2nd hand Blazes are like rocking horse droppings and there is a waiting list for new boats. Paul |
|
Paul
---------------------- D-Zero GBR 74 |
|
![]() |
|
SymBoy ![]() Newbie ![]() ![]() Joined: 01 Apr 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 38 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Mk1 and Mk2? I thought it was a one design. What's the difference?
|
|
![]() |
|
Contender 541 ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 05 Dec 05 Location: Burton on Trent Online Status: Offline Posts: 1402 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
There may be strong commercial reasons why the 4k is (apparently) being dropped, like Laser cannot justify it as a self supporting entity (it does not make money and the rest of the range supports it's production) Has anyone actually asked Laser what they are doing? |
|
When you find a big kettle of crazy it's probably best not to stir it - Pointy Haired Boss
Crew on 505 8780 |
|
![]() |
|
yellowhammer ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() Joined: 08 May 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 270 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
from (little) experience to date, the front runners go for the better performance (lighter) Mk 2 boats, and get top draw racing, but further down the fleet the Mk 2 boats are burried in amongst the Mk 1s ... there's still good racing in the Mk 1s i recon if you can bring the full potential out of a design (balancing performance against longevity) you're on to a long term winner ... settle for second best and you'll be bettered |
|
![]() |
|
carshalton fc ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 26 Jan 05 Location: England Online Status: Offline Posts: 2337 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
yer it would be great to take lots of weight out of the 4000 but it would mess the strong class racing up. if they were going to do anything to it i would love to see a carbon rig and cheaper sails.
|
|
International 14 1503
|
|
![]() |
|
m_liddell ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 27 May 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 583 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Knocking weight off would mess up the weight equalisation which is why the lighter 800 are/were only semi equalised.
|
|
![]() |
|
SymBoy ![]() Newbie ![]() ![]() Joined: 01 Apr 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 38 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
As I recall Laser 2 was in a similar situation when 4000 turned up!
|
|
![]() |
|
49erGBR735HSC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 30 Mar 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1991 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
£6k compared to £8k is still quite a difference. I'm making my point about not knocking any weight off due to the fact that the 4000 still has a relatively strong class and doesn't need to take that action to generate more interest in the class. Say you knock at least about 30kg off the weight of the 4000, add further more weights to the boat for class racing which would complicate issues further, what's to stop people taking all the weights out for club racing and having an unfair advantage. Not all the racing is done on the circuit and it would get down-heartening being stuck behind faster 4000s because they are lighter. I'm playing devil's advocate here because our club used to let us sail 5000s without weights and reckon that if the 5000 went the lighter route as is being suggested, they wouldn't have minded us knocking the correctors out if we had a lighter boat. If we still owned a 5000 and the class was pushing towards lighter boats being built by another builder, forgetting all other facts, the prospect of lighter boats being brought into the class would be enough to push us out into the 49er or I14. You can parallel the same sort of line of thought to Laser 4000 sailors jumping ship from the class to either the RS800 or the 29erXX. Future planning, do you buy a new 4000 which is slightly lighter or buy a faster boat for the same price (second-hand)?
Edited by 49erGBR735HSC |
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1234 5> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |