Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
RS Vision or Topper Omega? |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1234> |
Author | |
NathanL ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: 03 Nov 08 Online Status: Offline Posts: 9 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 04 Nov 08 at 6:15pm |
Well, going by the specs above (Vision is in brackets) the Trio is amazingly close to the Vision. Possibly a contender (no pun) except that I don't think the Trio can take an outboard?
Call me sad but that's actually a bonus for me, for when it's dead calm and/or I really can't be bothered to sail and just want a potter round the coastline. I haven PM'd Riki for a test sail of a Vision, lets see what happens. I think I've ruled out the Omega now, as well as the Bahia, so I think I'm getting somewhere! |
|
![]() |
|
Medway Maniac ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 13 May 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 2788 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
From the Comet Dinghies website http://www.cometdinghies.com/Comet-Trio.asp "optional extras such as front and rear lockers, fendering, oars and outboard motor make the Trio a classy cruising dinghy" |
|
![]() |
|
Lukepiewalker ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 24 May 06 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1341 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
My knee still hasn't recovered from rudderless sailing in a Bahia...
|
|
Ex-Finn GBR533 "Pie Hard"
Ex-National 12 3253 "Seawitch" Ex-National 12 2961 "Curved Air" Ex-Mirror 59096 "Voodoo Chile" |
|
![]() |
|
NathanL ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: 03 Nov 08 Online Status: Offline Posts: 9 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Good find, thats kept the Trio in the runnings for the moment although having just seen the much higher retail price (£6750) compared to the Vision I'm not sure it will stay in unless there are copious s/h ones going for the same sort of money I can get a Vision for. Just another thought- the Trio has a smooth hull whereas I see the Vision has 'grooves'- sorry I forget the technical term.... would that make the Vision a little bit less tippy do you think? As for the Trio oar option, not sure I'd want to be rowing a 140kg boat! |
|
![]() |
|
winging it ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 22 Mar 07 Online Status: Offline Posts: 3958 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I've done loads of teaching in a trio and found them to be really good boats. Great for taking out three or four complete beginners, trapeze option, assymetric if you want one, fore or aft sheeting, loads of space, options to reef.
However They would be more than a bit heavy to haul up a slipway on your own, nor would I really want to be out in one single handed in much over a f2 - they are big boats - and I'm not a light weight by any stretch! I think it's a mistake to dismiss what you call the 'old school' designs so lightly. The reason why there are still so many wayfarers, wanderers, GPs Ents etc still around is because they are a design that really works and has stood the test of time. They are raced and sailed everywhere right now and will be around a lot longer than many of the 'modern' boats such as those mass produced by topper and laser. That's why so many of the well informed sailors in this forum are recommending them. |
|
the same, but different...
|
|
![]() |
|
NathanL ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: 03 Nov 08 Online Status: Offline Posts: 9 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
On the contrary, I haven't dismissed the older boats at all and I'm sorry if I came across that way. I was just surprised how many of them appear to win favour over the newer breed of boat. I'm no expert on this at all, I haven't sailed much else other than a Laser, a Sonata, a Shearwater, a Tornado and if I really go back, a Cadet. All of which are old designs and not having sailed one of the newer, crazy boats like say an RS600 (which just about flooded the dingy park at Stone at one point) I just made an assumption that a new design would be better. Especially as how an RS600 made me look like I was going backwards most of the time! OK, I know they are not the same class of boat but you get my drift.
Notwithstanding that, I have been stunned many times by the reaching speed of a well-sailed Wayfarer which is why I can appreciate that newer is not always better. As it stands, I am down to either the Vision or the Trio. Both seem quite close in the runnings, but I take on board your comments re manhandling the Trio, which could be the decider. So, on that basis it looks like the Vision unless I can find any more information on the subject! So, thanks to all so far. I really appreciate not only the help but the time that you have taken to type out what are some quite lengthy replies which are detailed and highly informative. Hopefully one day I will be able to return my limited knowledge in some way to those less experienced than myself on this forum. Cheers, Nathan. |
|
![]() |
|
Medway Maniac ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 13 May 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 2788 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
RS Vision 125kg hull weight, Trio 145kg - add pretty well equal weights of rig to both and that's a difference not as significant as a lick of grease on the trolley wheel bearings so far as moving about onshore is concerned. Good/bad balance on the trolley will make a similar difference. From my experience lugging our club Visions about on training days, I'd expect both boats will require a lot of muscle. Frankly, I didn't notice that the Vision felt any easier or any lighter to pull up the beach than the race-spec Wayfarer I sometimes crew - both are very hard work and need a similar number of bodies! |
|
![]() |
|
alstorer ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 02 Aug 07 Location: Cambridge Online Status: Offline Posts: 2899 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Would it be cynical to suggest that the RS quoted hull weight is the mass of plastic used in the mold, whilst the Comet's is more likely to include fittings?
|
|
![]() |
|
Riki @ RS ![]() Groupie ![]() Joined: 01 Jun 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 71 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
yep!... shot weight of powder in the mould is 115kg. There's not that many fittings on a Vision. I don't think the 125kg includes the centreboard though, I'd probably need to weigh one to find out!
|
|
Riki Hooker
Sales Director, RS Sailing www.rssailing.com |
|
![]() |
|
NathanL ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: 03 Nov 08 Online Status: Offline Posts: 9 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Agreed, not much in it all all, and push comes to the shove I could probably tow with a car up the slipway (which isn't where I really want to launch from). I'm still working on being able to launch from the beach area though. If I can't wangle it then I will need to use good old human power to drag the boat up the slipway or mess about trying to get a tow!
I've still not ruled out the Comet, but I will need to monitor prices as the Comet is certainly more expensive to buy new. Too expensive really so it all comes down to what the residuals are doing. |
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1234> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |