Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
Controversial Topic of the Week |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 1011121314 16> |
Author | ||
Paramedic ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 27 Jan 06 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 929 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 29 Jan 06 at 8:44am |
|
I think the number is issued while the boat is being built and before it's measured. I've never seen a mirror without a sail number, and i've seen a number of GP14s that have numbers, but have definatley not been measured because they are used as school training boats. Certainly in the Merlins That's roughly how it works, and in the year book there are a number of boats listed as "Probably not built" inferring that the number was issued, but either the order was cancelled (Unlikely) or they were to be amateur built and the owner changed his mind or ran out of time. |
||
![]() |
||
Bumble ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() ![]() Joined: 12 Nov 05 Location: Taiwan Online Status: Offline Posts: 302 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I don't think anyone needs to get a hot head about the sail numbers, so long as you accept that the sail numbers are not an accurate show of boats built. Nobody ever pretended it was otherwise.
|
||
![]() |
||
Bumble ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() ![]() Joined: 12 Nov 05 Location: Taiwan Online Status: Offline Posts: 302 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Bringing it back on topic
Is the class really out of ideas as to how to develop the rule set. Do you (aardvark) or anyother 12 sailors out there think those pictures linked a few posts ago are a poor way for the class to go? Board foils, wing masts, more battens, larger jibs, less weight?? If it was me owning a 12 and voting, Id go for stability in the class and sit on the current rule set for a while - similar to the MR. I cannot for a minute believe your out of options though, and in a development class as used to change as the 12's its difficult to see why a concept boat is needed at all. |
||
![]() |
||
DiscoBall ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() Joined: 03 Jan 05 Online Status: Offline Posts: 305 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
A thread on a class message board isn't representative of any official class line - A certain aardvark just wants more excuses to get high on epoxy and indulge his cherub/moth side The class is very much taking the stability route a to build up the new boat numbers - it seems to be working as more double bottom boats are now finding their way onto the secondhand market and being snapped up by people upgrading from older designs. |
||
![]() |
||
Guest ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: 21 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Actually bumble I would think that most people DO think that sail numbers indicate number of boats. |
||
![]() |
||
Bumble ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() ![]() Joined: 12 Nov 05 Location: Taiwan Online Status: Offline Posts: 302 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
That's vey suprising as this thread has shown - just a modicum of investigation reveals numerical floors everywhere. I think most people would be aware SMODs with number based names start with their names number first and its face smackingly obvious that not all home built boats get finished. I never said the sail numbers didn't indicate numbers of boats built.... just don't give an accurate figure. If this is anybody's suprise then it is me who is shocked. But then I was shocked when people watched Big Brother, voted for New Labour twice, ever bought a packet of Super Noodles or that flavoured water and cried uncontrollable tears for the demise of the Princess of Wales. British people are if nothing else, interesting. |
||
![]() |
||
Guest ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: 21 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 0 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Most people can understand that most new SMOD classes with a numerical names don't start at 1 but Rob.e's claim that the numbers are padded by such a large amount is surprising to me ... Rick |
||
![]() |
||
Chew my RS ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 05 Oct 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 790 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Is it legal to skip numbers? Whilst the sail number might technically just be a unique identifier, the inference is clearly 'look how many we've sold'. Starting at numbers higher than 1 is cheeky enough (though it is sort of understandable to start a 'SMOD 1000' on number 1001) but jumping in multiples of 7 (for example) is just deceptive and can only be meant to imply greater sales than actually achieved. Can the RYA not police this? |
||
![]() |
||
JimC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Only if they make claims about boats sold based on the sail numbers I would think. There are some odd systems too: in Hobie Cats the sail number is exactly that, and if you buy a new sail you get a new sail number. Then if you want really weird how about the 29er system:-
|
||
![]() |
||
Stefan Lloyd ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 03 Aug 04 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1599 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
In classes I've been involved with, the number is issued to the builder before measurement, normally well beforehand. Apart from anything else, as people have indicated, many classes require the sail number to be engraved or otherwise attached to the hull, so the builder has to know it early on. |
||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 1011121314 16> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |