Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
RS500 ... |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 2021222324 34> |
Author | |||
Matt Jackson ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 21 Sep 04 Location: Darlington Online Status: Offline Posts: 962 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 12 Dec 05 at 1:27pm |
||
Yeah, but all that work with light wind summer has taken about 2 stone off me. Also I recently told the local IC sailors (John Ellis among them) it'd be a cold day in hell before I sailed a boat with a sliding seat as my old class (Hornets) dropped them in the late 70's in favour of wires. That and my constant reference to the Contender as 'The Ultimate Singlehander' might make me an unpopular classmate |
|||
Laser 203001, Harrier (H+) 36
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Bumble ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() ![]() Joined: 12 Nov 05 Location: Taiwan Online Status: Offline Posts: 302 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Sounds to me like your in need of some Scorpion therapy.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Matt Jackson ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 21 Sep 04 Location: Darlington Online Status: Offline Posts: 962 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
I take it that involves sailing a Scorpion rather than some kind of DIY Botox, in which case see my comment on ICs. Anyway I think even a Scorpion would be a handful single-handed. Sorry and all that, but my signature does indicate what sort of response is likely (Actually that post probably wasn't aimed at me was it? Never mind, must keep up the grumpy old man image) Edited by Matt Jackson |
|||
Laser 203001, Harrier (H+) 36
|
|||
![]() |
|||
NeilP ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() ![]() Joined: 23 Nov 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 271 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Been reading all this stuff about boatspeed with much interest. Whilst I agree you don't need a brand-new boat with perfect foils, sails etc to win, why make life difficult? If you can win with a slow boat, think how much easier and less stressful life would be if your boat was faster! Boat preparation may be time-consuming (some people might even say boring), but it's a lot less time-consuming than the hours and hours on the water you'd need to hone your boat handling and tactics to the level where you can make up for a basic lack of speed. The best start ever won't help you if you get rolled 200yds up the first beat by 5 boats whose start was nearly as good as yours, but who are simply going 1/4 of a knot faster! Neil |
|||
No FD? No Comment!
|
|||
![]() |
|||
JimC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Just as a matter of interest, if you think the Contender is the ultimate singlehander what would you call the orginal prototype Bob/Benny designed which was nearly a 100lbs lighter and, rumour has it, occasionally embarassed A cats of the day? |
|||
![]() |
|||
Matt Jackson ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 21 Sep 04 Location: Darlington Online Status: Offline Posts: 962 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Well firstly of course I'd love to have a go! I wonder though if the Contender would be the class it is today. The Contender has grown in numbers gradually over the years (2400 in 40ish years) never really attracting the pot-hunters that Olympic selection would have brought, never really forcing development. Sometimes low-tech is better for a classes longevity, which is why there are so many Contenders still around. Sure weight could have been reduced and exotic mateials brought in earlier but maybe we don't want to have to think too hard about (or put our hand in our pockets for) the techy stuff. By the way, the Contender IS 'The Ultimate Singlehander', it says so on the website and try as many people have it's never been disproved |
|||
Laser 203001, Harrier (H+) 36
|
|||
![]() |
|||
grimupnorth ![]() Groupie ![]() Joined: 08 Dec 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 48 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
You're quite right that it's less stessful to have a fast boat, but I can't agree about boat prep being less time-consuming than practice. I'm no rock star, and I can't imagine ever being so good that a couple of hours practice on the water won't help me improve something about my boat handling. Two hours on the water vs two hours fairing my foils? No contest. And with practice sessions, I see the result straight away - with boat prep, the reward is at best deferred, and at worst uncertain. Boat prep is necessary, but not fun! |
|||
![]() |
|||
JimC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Cambridge on Line Dictionary
Right. Its clearly not the most extreme singlehander, its clearly not (by neither numbers or international distribution) the most important, its definitely neither the orginal singlehander nor the final singlehander, I don't suppose you're claining its the worst, so the onlty possible claim on the work ultimate is that its the "best" singlehander. The claim's looking very rocky already. Now lets go back to the same source for a definition of best.
Well clearly not of the highest quality, otherwise there wouldn't be one design restrictions which prevent you making it better. Most suitable? Means very little in this context - the Contender may be the most suitable boat for Contender racing as no others are allowed, but that's true of any class. Pleasing? No, you can't see a boat which is as rare as the Contnder is especially pleasing, the Laser wins the popularity contest hands down. Effective? Again effective for what, but in terms of speed, ease of handling or any other factors there are clearly superior boats in any factor. About all you could claim is its a compromise sonme people like. Right, that disproves that claim (which is equally ridiculous for every other class that makes it in any way, 14 class please note). Going to get it taken off your website? |
|||
![]() |
|||
Black no sugar ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 04 Dec 04 Location: Somewhere between Brighton and Lancing Online Status: Offline Posts: 3941 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Phew! Feeling better now? If you want exaggerated claims of superiority weeded out of websites, you've got a job and a half, Jim! (if they're happy to say they're the best, why not let them? After all, you don't have to believe it |
|||
![]() |
|||
NeilP ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() ![]() Joined: 23 Nov 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 271 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Jim - one-design restrictions are there to stop you making it different, not necessarily better. Define better? Better does not necessarily mean faster. "Of the highest quality" can only be in the judgement of someone. I could quite easily imagine people believing a Contender to be "of the highest quality" Numbers built has nothing to do with how "pleasing" a boat may be. No-one could possibly claim that a Laser is pleasing upwind in 6 knots - or 20 knots come to that! So there are huge fleets all over the world,does that make it pleasing? By that measure the Toyota Corolla is the most pleasing car in the world... None of your arguments work, whichever way you cut it. If I didn't know better I might think you've got a bit of a chip on your shoulder Neil |
|||
No FD? No Comment!
|
|||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 2021222324 34> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |