Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
RS500 ... |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 910111213 34> |
Author | |
NeilP ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() ![]() Joined: 23 Nov 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 271 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 29 Nov 05 at 2:35pm |
Chewie - does your new class remind you of anything? I14 went through many changes of rule before we got to where we are now - that's the problem with out-and-out development classes. In order to remain at the cutting edge - as if that matters - you have to develop the rule as well as the boat within the rule. The FD class has, in some ways, the best of both. You can build in any material, with any cockpit layout subject to min deck area, with any weight distribution you want. The hull shape is almost one-design, the measurement tolerances were only originally put in place to help builders. The foils are closely controlled, but controls and fittings, standing and running rigging are free. The rule has been robust enough, with only 2 significant changes since it was written, to cope with the pressures of Olympic competition, and the boat itself was the fastest 2-man dinghy in the world until the mid 90's. Not so familiar with the 5oh, but their rules work in a very similar way. A modern 5oh or FD is a very serious piece of kit indeed and in no way dated. Lots of people on here extolling the virtues of the V3000, which is a 30-odd year old hull with an asymmetric which completely ruins the balance of the boat downwind! A trendy-looking kite does not make a boat 'modern' or good to sail, necessarily, any more than a symmetric kite, overlapping jib and only one wire makes it 'dated' or boring Manufacturers have to recoup the cost of development, tooling, bolstering second-hand values etc quickly, so they have to sell a lot of boats fast. Classes like the 50h, FD, Fireball etc built up over years, with lots of different boatbuilders and sailors having input into build techniques, fittings, rig development etc. Why is it that an FD can be raced competitively with a crew weight of anything between 145 and 200+ kg ( a range of 50+kg), yet RS can't design a multi-purpose boat to cope with a range of more than 30kg? Because we can go and buy a mast and sails that suit us, and then use the systems the Gods of sailing have developed to tune the thing while we race, that's why! If you don't fit the physical profile for the average SMOD, there's not much point in even turning up. I firmly believe that dinghy sailing would be much healthier, and might even have progressed faster, without the influence of Topper, Laser, RS. Neil
|
|
No FD? No Comment!
|
|
![]() |
|
49erGBR735HSC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 30 Mar 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1991 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I don't think that clubs on a whole should enforce class racing and adopt certain classes, I reckon if there is a need for class racing within a club, the sailors will create it without having to be told by the club they must race a certain class. Its easy enough for sailors to spot an appropriate class and jointly move into the class together, for example at HSC there was a big movement to Laser sailing which I think is now shifting towards 4000s. If there are enough boats within a class, they will be able to merit their own class results but at the same time there is still handicap racing for people who don't want to adopt that class. If I was looking to join a club and told that I can't race my boat there and must sail the club's adopted classes, I'd simply not join that club and look for a more accomidating club, as I'm sure many other sailors would do too.
|
|
![]() |
|
Stefan Lloyd ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 03 Aug 04 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1599 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
You've lost me there. In what way do manufacturers spend money on bolstering 2nd-hand values? |
|
![]() |
|
49erGBR735HSC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 30 Mar 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1991 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I have to disagree with you on the comments about the 3000. I used to race Laser 2s and did a bit of racing in the 3000 and adding the asymetric didn't ruin the balance of the boat. The 2/3000 hull likes to plain and I reckon that the addition of the assymetric kite was a positive thing because it promoted the type of sailing that would encourage plaining and simplified a great boat to sail without losing any performance. According to Frank Bethwaite in his book, the design of the hull was influenced by some 18foot skiff designs of the time and contary to what everyone thinks, isn't a stretched Laser hull. Edited by 49erGBR735HSC |
|
![]() |
|
Stefan Lloyd ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 03 Aug 04 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1599 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The club might say: fine then, your boat isn't taking up valuable space in the boat park that we could give to someone who does want to support our classes. And people handicap racing in other clubs might say, I'm fed up with this, I'll join that a club with strong class racing. Especially if they already had a boat in one of those classes. So it cuts both ways, unless the club is just desperate for any members it can get. Some are, some aren't. Edited by Stefan Lloyd |
|
![]() |
|
49erGBR735HSC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 30 Mar 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1991 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I agree Stefan, its just down to individual preferance and there are clubs that benefit from restricting the choices of classes.
|
|
![]() |
|
NeilP ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() ![]() Joined: 23 Nov 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 271 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Each to his own! I loved the Laser 2, but I think the amount of lee helm the 3000 carries is ridiculous. Before anyone starts, yes I know there are ways round it, but to me it's a sign that the boat is a rush job, and an unsatisfactory hybrid. Stefan - what do you think all the desparate tarde-in deals were all about??? Neil |
|
No FD? No Comment!
|
|
![]() |
|
iansmithofotley ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() Joined: 16 Mar 04 Location: Otley, West Yorkshire Online Status: Offline Posts: 209 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hi everyone, I would just like to say that, in my opinion, this has been one of the best debates on a topic for a while, even though I have not contributed myself. All of the posts have been interesting and even more so as the debate has go on. It has also been refreshing to read posts that have been written in 'English' with proper sentences, good spelling and grammar, as opposed to mobile phone, text type, language, which is often posted and is so tedious to read. I would just like to thank all of the contributors for their efforts and look forward to the debate carrying on. Ian (Yorkshire Dales S.C.) |
|
![]() |
|
NeilP ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() ![]() Joined: 23 Nov 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 271 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thnx m8. U R a gent!!!
![]() |
|
No FD? No Comment!
|
|
![]() |
|
JimC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
No indeed not. In fact its a stretched, lowered freeboard and corners rounded Cherub Hull. That was 74 vintage Cherub though. Edited by JimC |
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 910111213 34> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |