New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: Heavy Weights vs Light Weights
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Heavy Weights vs Light Weights

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 5>
Author
FreshScum View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 27 Apr 04
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 99
Post Options Post Options   Quote FreshScum Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Heavy Weights vs Light Weights
    Posted: 01 Dec 07 at 4:28pm
With any class, weight wise, it always pays to be the median weight of the class. At the top of the bell curve. At this weight, as long as you are the best sailor tactically, in a series over a range of conditions, you will win.
Back to Top
Barty View Drop Down
Far too distracted from work
Far too distracted from work
Avatar

Joined: 16 Mar 04
Location: Scotland
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 240
Post Options Post Options   Quote Barty Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 Nov 07 at 6:27pm

Originally posted by JimC

Where you are going wrong is............



Edited by Barty
Back to Top
hurricane View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 15 Mar 04
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1047
Post Options Post Options   Quote hurricane Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 Nov 07 at 3:35pm
people get into weight matters in to much detail at the end of the day one bad tack can lose as much as being 3 kg to heavy for the boat in the lightstuff. I know this is my personal opinion but at the end of the day unless your nationals/ european winning tallent its not that important. Boat time is way more important than weight in most cases.
lifes to short to sail slow boats!

RIP Olympic Tornado 1976-2007
Back to Top
JimC View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 17 May 04
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6662
Post Options Post Options   Quote JimC Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 Nov 07 at 3:11pm
Originally posted by Barty

The author assumes and expects that 'armchair' dinghy designers will criticise, neh, mock these calulations


Your diagrams demonstrate that a boat which has vertical topsides above the static waterine will gain WSA much more slowly than one which is flared. This is of course correct.

Where you are going wrong is in not thinking about the actual immersed shape of whole of your boats. Whilst in light air a typical wedge shaped skiff may have the whole of the mid section immersed up to the chine, the aft sections will be much less immersed with bow down trim, thus greatly flared above the waterplane, and its the aft areas where the WSA will come from.
Back to Top
Iain C View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 16 Mar 04
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1113
Post Options Post Options   Quote Iain C Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 Nov 07 at 2:29pm

Agree, massively class dependant.

Fireball, Adam Whitehouse and Mike Pratt...both of these guys are big (Mike's huge, well over 6 foot) and they FLY in the light stuff when they have no reason to.  That said, with Mike "the lever" on the wire when it's windy and they fly too!

Tom V and I are too heavy for a Cherub in the light stuff and we get crucfied.  To the extent we don't even bother going out.  However big breeze we will be fully powering the 2005 rig when other lightweights are spilling their 97s, and getting Suicide Blonde going faster than much newer craft.

RS700 GBR922 "Wirespeed"
Fireball GBR14474 "Eleven Parsecs"
Enterprise GBR21970
Bavaria 32 GBR4755L "Adastra"
Back to Top
Chew my RS View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 05 Oct 05
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 790
Post Options Post Options   Quote Chew my RS Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 Nov 07 at 2:13pm

Hmmm, I think you made a mistake somewhere.

The draught of th box section with 160kg crew weight is 39mm (in fresh water), increasing to 51mm for the heavier crew.  These equate to WSA of 8.468m^2 and 8.612m^2 respectively, which is an increase 0.144m^2, or 1.7%.

I did a triangle rather than a circle (cos it was easier!) and the draught is 78mm increasing to 102.5mm.  WSA is 8.332m^2 increasing to 8.452m^2 - an increase of 0.12m^2, or 1.4%.  So the trianglular section is 'better' (from a WSA weight sensitivity perspective) than the box section, which is as you would expect (as the waterplane area increases with draught).  However increasing waterplane area (and waterline beam) introduces its own problems...

And, of course, you have to consider the juxtoposition of Jupiter with Venus.

http://www.sailns14.org - The ultimate family raceboat now available in the UK
Back to Top
Norbert View Drop Down
Far too distracted from work
Far too distracted from work
Avatar

Joined: 31 Mar 04
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 351
Post Options Post Options   Quote Norbert Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 Nov 07 at 2:09pm
Originally posted by Barty

Assumption/Disclaimer
  • No account has been taken for waves, wind, atmospheric pressure, the seagull to sky ratio, the ambient temperature of the water, whether the tree surrounding the water have leafs on them, whether the sailors are carrying clean hankies or annswer to the name of Susan
And you can't spell "answer"!!


Edited by Norbert
Back to Top
Barty View Drop Down
Far too distracted from work
Far too distracted from work
Avatar

Joined: 16 Mar 04
Location: Scotland
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 240
Post Options Post Options   Quote Barty Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 Nov 07 at 1:27pm

Originally posted by JimC

You're assuming that waterplane area doesn't change with the extra immersion. On the flatter boats it can increase spectacularly.

I thought about this and did a few rough and ready calc's to see if that true. 

Imagine 2 boats that are 4m long, 2m wide and 0.5m deep.  Both have constant section along there length (see assumptions/disclaimer at the end) to make the lunch time maths easier.  Both boats weigh 150kgs all up and the crew weigh 160kg all up.  One is box section the other is round bilged

The box sections draft would be 2.2cm in salt water and the round bilge would be 9.5cm, nothing revolutionary there.  The STATIC wetted surface area (WSA) is 8.04m2 for the box and 4.52m2 for the bilge

Now if both crew members ate the pie diet and put on 100kgs between them the draft would be as follows:

So for the box section the draft has increased by 127% (2.8cm) and the bilge has increased by 26% (2.5cm).  The interesting bit is WSA, the box has increased by 0.7% whilst the bilge by 12.6%.

So by eloquent and logical deduction, box type craft, i.e. little or no rocker, large flat planning surfaces can carry weight better as the WSA doesn't increase greatly as it is already high (hence high drag as sub-planning speeds).  Where as round bilge or tradional designs suffer higher WSA's as weight increases and hence more frictional resistance as weight increases.

Assumption/Disclaimer

  • No account has been taken for waves, wind, atmospheric pressure, the seagull to sky ratio, the ambient temperature of the water, whether the tree surrounding the water have leafs on them, whether the sailors are carrying clean hankies or answer to the name of Susan
  • These calculations took place during a lunchtime thought shower and as such should not be used in anyway other than those intended.  The author reserves the right to provide any user with a 5p per litre discount during the promotion of these calculation (terms and conditions apply) but can and will withdraw the offer without notice.
  • The boats used in the calculations are not real and as such should not be taken as a "recognised design" any forum member who willing choses to build and race a craft of identical/similar proportions shall have no claim against the author following disappointing results, soiling or spoiling of any sailing gear or ridicule.
  • The author assumes and expects that 'armchair' dinghy designers will criticise, neh, mock these calulations
  • Finally the author denies any involvement with the above and is currently under going an interview for MI5 to go and play briefcases in Russia

The end



Edited by Barty
Back to Top
English Dave View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 10 Aug 06
Location: Northern Ireland
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 682
Post Options Post Options   Quote English Dave Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 Nov 07 at 9:24am

Originally posted by m_liddell

An aside, but I think being light for a boat often makes you a better sailor out of necessity. Better hiking style, flat wiring, faster out on the wire out of tacks etc.

I don't think it's an aside at all. I think it's central to what makes lighter sailors faster.

Balls! I've just rembered someone who kills all my theories. Richard Stenhouse!

English Dave
Ballyholme Yacht Club

(You'd think I'd be better at it by now)

Hurricane 5.9 SX
RS700
Back to Top
m_liddell View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 27 May 05
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 583
Post Options Post Options   Quote m_liddell Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 Nov 07 at 7:20pm
An aside, but I think being light for a boat often makes you a better sailor out of necessity. Better hiking style, flat wiring, faster out on the wire out of tacks etc.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 5>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.665y
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz
Change your personal settings, or read our privacy policy