Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
Heavy Weights vs Light Weights |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 123 5> |
Author | |
FreshScum ![]() Groupie ![]() Joined: 27 Apr 04 Online Status: Offline Posts: 99 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 01 Dec 07 at 4:28pm |
With any class, weight wise, it always pays to be the median weight of the class. At the top of the bell curve. At this weight, as long as you are the best sailor tactically, in a series over a range of conditions, you will win.
|
|
![]() |
|
Barty ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() ![]() Joined: 16 Mar 04 Location: Scotland Online Status: Offline Posts: 240 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Edited by Barty |
|
![]() |
|
hurricane ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 15 Mar 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1047 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
people get into weight matters in to much detail at the end of the day one bad tack can lose as much as being 3 kg to heavy for the boat in the lightstuff. I know this is my personal opinion but at the end of the day unless your nationals/ european winning tallent its not that important. Boat time is way more important than weight in most cases.
|
|
lifes to short to sail slow boats!
RIP Olympic Tornado 1976-2007 |
|
![]() |
|
JimC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Your diagrams demonstrate that a boat which has vertical topsides above the static waterine will gain WSA much more slowly than one which is flared. This is of course correct. Where you are going wrong is in not thinking about the actual immersed shape of whole of your boats. Whilst in light air a typical wedge shaped skiff may have the whole of the mid section immersed up to the chine, the aft sections will be much less immersed with bow down trim, thus greatly flared above the waterplane, and its the aft areas where the WSA will come from. |
|
![]() |
|
Iain C ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 16 Mar 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1113 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Agree, massively class dependant. Fireball, Adam Whitehouse and Mike Pratt...both of these guys are big (Mike's huge, well over 6 foot) and they FLY in the light stuff when they have no reason to. That said, with Mike "the lever" on the wire when it's windy and they fly too! Tom V and I are too heavy for a Cherub in the light stuff and we get crucfied. To the extent we don't even bother going out. However big breeze we will be fully powering the 2005 rig when other lightweights are spilling their 97s, and getting Suicide Blonde going faster than much newer craft. |
|
RS700 GBR922 "Wirespeed"
Fireball GBR14474 "Eleven Parsecs" Enterprise GBR21970 Bavaria 32 GBR4755L "Adastra" |
|
![]() |
|
Chew my RS ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 05 Oct 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 790 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hmmm, I think you made a mistake somewhere. The draught of th box section with 160kg crew weight is 39mm (in fresh water), increasing to 51mm for the heavier crew. These equate to WSA of 8.468m^2 and 8.612m^2 respectively, which is an increase 0.144m^2, or 1.7%. I did a triangle rather than a circle (cos it was easier!) and the draught is 78mm increasing to 102.5mm. WSA is 8.332m^2 increasing to 8.452m^2 - an increase of 0.12m^2, or 1.4%. So the trianglular section is 'better' (from a WSA weight sensitivity perspective) than the box section, which is as you would expect (as the waterplane area increases with draught). However increasing waterplane area (and waterline beam) introduces its own problems... And, of course, you have to consider the juxtoposition of Jupiter with Venus. |
|
http://www.sailns14.org - The ultimate family raceboat now available in the UK
|
|
![]() |
|
Norbert ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() ![]() Joined: 31 Mar 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 351 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Edited by Norbert |
|
![]() |
|
Barty ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() ![]() Joined: 16 Mar 04 Location: Scotland Online Status: Offline Posts: 240 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I thought about this and did a few rough and ready calc's to see if that true. Imagine 2 boats that are 4m long, 2m wide and 0.5m deep. Both have constant section along there length (see assumptions/disclaimer at the end) to make the lunch time maths easier. Both boats weigh 150kgs all up and the crew weigh 160kg all up. One is box section the other is round bilged The box sections draft would be 2.2cm in salt water and the round bilge would be 9.5cm, nothing revolutionary there. The STATIC wetted surface area (WSA) is 8.04m2 for the box and 4.52m2 for the bilge Now if both crew members ate the pie diet and put on 100kgs between them the draft would be as follows: So for the box section the draft has increased by 127% (2.8cm) and the bilge has increased by 26% (2.5cm). The interesting bit is WSA, the box has increased by 0.7% whilst the bilge by 12.6%. So by eloquent and logical deduction, box type craft, i.e. little or no rocker, large flat planning surfaces can carry weight better as the WSA doesn't increase greatly as it is already high (hence high drag as sub-planning speeds). Where as round bilge or tradional designs suffer higher WSA's as weight increases and hence more frictional resistance as weight increases. Assumption/Disclaimer
The end Edited by Barty |
|
![]() |
|
English Dave ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 10 Aug 06 Location: Northern Ireland Online Status: Offline Posts: 682 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I don't think it's an aside at all. I think it's central to what makes lighter sailors faster. Balls! I've just rembered someone who kills all my theories. Richard Stenhouse! |
|
![]() |
|
m_liddell ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 27 May 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 583 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
An aside, but I think being light for a boat often makes you a better sailor out of necessity. Better hiking style, flat wiring, faster out on the wire out of tacks etc.
|
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 123 5> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |