New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: Rule 87
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Rule 87

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 456
Author
Andymac View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 04 Apr 07
Location: Derbyshire
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 852
Post Options Post Options   Quote Andymac Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Rule 87
    Posted: 19 Mar 09 at 6:58pm

Well you learn something new every day!

JimC's assertion is entirely reasonable, but I never realised there was such a significant problem with the Laser hull. I thought for a moment that craiggo had misused the word (apologies). The obvious example of an assymetric hull(s) would be the Hobie 16 catamaran.

I now have a good excuse now, when I don't so well on one tack and then....... even worse on the other!



Edited by Andymac
Back to Top
JimC View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 17 May 04
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6661
Post Options Post Options   Quote JimC Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 Mar 09 at 8:29pm
Originally posted by Andymac

I never realised there was such a significant problem with the Laser hull.

I *very* much doubt there is a significant problem. Significant as requiring different handling on opposite tacks or causing any noticeable difference in performance.

Edited by JimC
Back to Top
Andymac View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 04 Apr 07
Location: Derbyshire
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 852
Post Options Post Options   Quote Andymac Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 Mar 09 at 9:50pm

So is craiggo overplaying it? Who does knows what the variance is, if there has been all these studies that concur? Would say 5 -10 millimetres really be all that remarkable?

Back to Top
craiggo View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 01 Apr 04
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1810
Post Options Post Options   Quote craiggo Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 Mar 09 at 10:48pm
From memory I cant remember exactly the numbers that came up when I last saw it done, but it was small ie. less than 3mm diference in centreline to hull port/stbd.

There have always been those who claim the laser always sailed better on port but I reckon my 700 does and I think its more about our own dexterity rather than the boats.

My original point though was if you make a correction to a known fault or defect in a design and start producing them as your own, have you infringed copyright?
Back to Top
Guest View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 21 May 04
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 0
Post Options Post Options   Quote Guest Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 Mar 09 at 11:19pm

Originally posted by craiggo

From memory I cant remember exactly the numbers that came up when I last saw it done, but it was small ie. less than 3mm diference in centreline to hull port/stbd.

There have always been those who claim the laser always sailed better on port but I reckon my 700 does and I think its more about our own dexterity rather than the boats.

My original point though was if you make a correction to a known fault or defect in a design and start producing them as your own, have you infringed copyright?

If it looks like a Laser it's a Laser regardless of a few mm here & there ...

Back to Top
Stefan Lloyd View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 03 Aug 04
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1599
Post Options Post Options   Quote Stefan Lloyd Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 Mar 09 at 9:18am

Originally posted by craiggo

My original point though was if you make a correction to a known fault or defect in a design and start producing them as your own, have you infringed copyright?

If all you've done is a minor change like fairing an error in a mold, yes you would have. Same as musicians who end up paying royalties when they've copied a chord sequence from someone else's work. It doesn't have to be identical to infringe copyright.  

Back to Top
ColPrice2002 View Drop Down
Far too distracted from work
Far too distracted from work


Joined: 25 Nov 08
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 222
Post Options Post Options   Quote ColPrice2002 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 Mar 09 at 9:40am

Same as musicians who end up paying royalties when they've copied a chord sequence from someone else's work

- doesn't have to be a chord sequence ... Dick Batt's (Batt sails) brother Mike Batt was sued for infringement of copyright of Cage's 4:33.

Cage's 4:33 is that length of silence (though performed by a full orchestra), MikesBatt's piece "one minute" was 60 seconds of silence - though scored for different instruments...

Be careful out there!

Back to Top
Rupert View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 11 Aug 04
Location: Whitefriars sc
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 8956
Post Options Post Options   Quote Rupert Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 31 Mar 09 at 10:28pm
Originally posted by ColPrice2002

Same as musicians who end up paying royalties when they've copied a chord sequence from someone else's work

- doesn't have to be a chord sequence ... Dick Batt's (Batt sails) brother Mike Batt was sued for infringement of copyright of Cage's 4:33.

Cage's 4:33 is that length of silence (though performed by a full orchestra), MikesBatt's piece "one minute" was 60 seconds of silence - though scored for different instruments...

Be careful out there!

I'd not heard that one! Does that mean that John Cage can sue everytime we have a minutes silence on Rememberance Sunday...

Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 456

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.665y
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz
Change your personal settings, or read our privacy policy