Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
Square Top Rigs on 18's |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <12 |
Author | ||
Granite ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() ![]() Joined: 12 May 04 Location: Scotland Online Status: Offline Posts: 476 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 01 Mar 05 at 1:27pm |
|
That would seem to be the case in the 12' inspired C-Tech/Fife rigs that have been appearing on some cherubs in the UK, Jim C can correct me but some of them seem to be set up with the main shrouds not connected to the lower spreaders and with the caps being static bend controll on the masts. With the Kicker and Cuningham bending the mast while sailing. |
||
If it doesn't break it's too heavy; if it does it wasn't built right
|
||
![]() |
||
JimC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6661 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Mine is set up with caps and main shrouds both through lower spreaders and locked in place by the checks to the spreader roots. Both caps and main shrouds are bending the lower mast forward, only the checks bring it back straight. I suppose you could adjust the checks to control prebend statically but I've never felt the need. Because I've got a mast stump the kicker doesn't try and put bend into the lower part of the mast.
|
||
![]() |
||
Blobby ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 07 May 04 Location: Australia Online Status: Offline Posts: 779 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Is this not just a reaction to the increase in roach and the really fat-headed sails that are being cut now? These must put more load on the tip of the mast meaning a relatively stiffer section will still provide the same gust response as the more flexible tips do when coupled with more pointy headed sails? |
||
![]() |
||
eric_c ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() Joined: 21 Jan 18 Online Status: Offline Posts: 382 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Bump!
|
||
![]() |
||
423zero ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 08 Jan 15 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 3420 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Bump?
|
||
Robert
|
||
![]() |
||
eric_c ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() Joined: 21 Jan 18 Online Status: Offline Posts: 382 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I thought it was useful info (and opinion) in the context of today's other thread.
|
||
![]() |
||
423zero ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 08 Jan 15 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 3420 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Got it, read both pages before I noticed date.
|
||
Robert
|
||
![]() |
||
ChrisI ![]() Posting king ![]() ![]() Joined: 09 Aug 10 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 143 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Interesting thanks.
JimCs comment suggest that if we used fully battened that some 'gust response' could be designed into the top part of the sail more easily. Unfortunately fully battened might be unmanageable for us for rigging/launching/large wind changes. |
||
![]() |
||
eric_c ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() Joined: 21 Jan 18 Online Status: Offline Posts: 382 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I've never noticed fully battened being much worse than anything else for rigging and launching.
|
||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <12 |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |