New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: LPE in Portugal goes bust ?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

LPE in Portugal goes bust ?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
Grumpycat View Drop Down
Far too distracted from work
Far too distracted from work


Joined: 29 Sep 20
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 497
Post Options Post Options   Quote Grumpycat Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: LPE in Portugal goes bust ?
    Posted: 28 May 22 at 9:53pm
I have heard a rumour that LPE in Portugal have gone bust and the EU are looking for their 3 million euro back  Wink
Pico , Vago and Bahia have not been made for a while because of legal action by Jo Richard’s for unpaid royalties. Think we have been there before lol. 

If this is true I don’t think we will be seeing the Po@nstar any time soon . 

Does any one have any more info on this or even if it’s true .  Smile


Edited by Grumpycat - 28 May 22 at 9:58pm
Back to Top
fab100 View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 15 Mar 11
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1005
Post Options Post Options   Quote fab100 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 May 22 at 10:23pm
Hilarious
Back to Top
Grumpycat View Drop Down
Far too distracted from work
Far too distracted from work


Joined: 29 Sep 20
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 497
Post Options Post Options   Quote Grumpycat Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 May 22 at 10:39pm
Originally posted by fab100

Hilarious

I found it funny too , not so sure I would find it so funny if I was a Sunfish owner in the USA .  Confused
Though to be honest I would be very surprised if the owner of this company had not already transferred the ip of the Sunfish and the Laser to other companies already  Dead


Edited by Grumpycat - 28 May 22 at 10:53pm
Back to Top
fab100 View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 15 Mar 11
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1005
Post Options Post Options   Quote fab100 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 May 22 at 11:40pm
actually, i need to clarify my throwaway comment.

Hilarious if Rastegar really has demonstrated again that he’s not fit to run a limited liability company.

But there are laws about insolvent trading that make directors personally responsible for their company’s debts. I hope Jo gets all his royalties of course, preferably at R’s personal expense, and the guy is also banned from ever being involved in a company again. 

Bonus if the pornstar is stillborn; who needs it. There’s plenty enough single-handers already
Back to Top
JimC View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 17 May 04
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6661
Post Options Post Options   Quote JimC Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 May 22 at 3:10am
Don't get too excited folks. I think we can be pretty confident that the IP will be well separated from the companies doing the trading, and there's nothing illegal about managing a business badly, to get in trouble you have to step over the line to stuff that's actually prohibited.
Back to Top
fab100 View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 15 Mar 11
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1005
Post Options Post Options   Quote fab100 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 May 22 at 3:48am
Originally posted by JimC

Don't get too excited folks. I think we can be pretty confident that the IP will be well separated from the companies doing the trading, and there's nothing illegal about managing a business badly, to get in trouble you have to step over the line to stuff that's actually prohibited.

and prohibited includes taking credit when you don’t have the funds to pay. One would hope Jo’s royalty contract would account for that IP/trading differentiation(s). But the Kirby case shows there’s form here of course
Back to Top
turnturtle View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 05 Dec 14
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2538
Post Options Post Options   Quote turnturtle Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 May 22 at 7:24am
AIUI - some v. wealthy people use debt-laden companies to help write off personal tax exposure - it kind of doesn’t matter what the company trades. They’d have to be quite unlucky to get their fingers burnt with such a stroll in the park, especially when the wealth management experts claim it’s nothing but plain sailing for optimising tax contributions
Back to Top
Grumpycat View Drop Down
Far too distracted from work
Far too distracted from work


Joined: 29 Sep 20
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 497
Post Options Post Options   Quote Grumpycat Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 May 22 at 7:26am
Originally posted by JimC

Don't get too excited folks. I think we can be pretty confident that the IP will be well separated from the companies doing the trading, and there's nothing illegal about managing a business badly, to get in trouble you have to step over the line to stuff that's actually prohibited.

If it’s true , history tells us you will be correct. This company owner always seem to know how push it right to the edge of the law without actually crossing it. One can only hope he doesn’t know EU law as well has he knows the laws in the USA. BUT I’m not holding my breath. 
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 May 22 at 7:31am
Originally posted by turnturtle

AIUI - some v. wealthy people use debt-laden companies to help write off personal tax exposure - it kind of doesn’t matter what the company trades. They’d have to be quite unlucky to get their fingers burnt with such a stroll in the park, especially when the wealth management experts claim it’s nothing but plain sailing for optimising tax contributions
LOL
Back to Top
turnturtle View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 05 Dec 14
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2538
Post Options Post Options   Quote turnturtle Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 May 22 at 9:27am
Originally posted by fab100

Bonus if the pornstar is stillborn; who needs it. There’s plenty enough single-handers already


can we will still accuse the PYAG of nautical infanticide?

Edited by turnturtle - 29 May 22 at 9:27am
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.665y
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz
Change your personal settings, or read our privacy policy