RTIR 12 - Cancelled Classes |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 78910> |
Author | |
RS400atC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 04 Dec 08 Online Status: Offline Posts: 3011 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 03 Jul 12 at 10:10pm |
Extract from the LNTM: """ In order to separate the competitors from any commercial traffic movements intending to pass through the Central Solent, or bound to or from the Port of Southampton, during the starting period, Masters of vessels not directly involved in the event are to arrange to be clear of the start area by 0630hrs and are not to enter the start area until after 0900hrs or when the bulk of competitors have cleared the area.""" So the non racing craft were in fact breaking the law by being in the starting area..... |
|
![]() |
|
furtive ![]() Posting king ![]() Joined: 30 Mar 05 Online Status: Offline Posts: 188 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I think the key words here may be commercial traffic... |
|
![]() |
|
Smithy ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: 20 Mar 06 Online Status: Offline Posts: 21 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Well you could try the later paragraph from the LNTM: "8. All spectator craft not taking part in the race are to keep well clear of the start area or are to proceed to one of the designated holding areas, as depicted on Chartlet 1, and keep clear of the Main Navigational Channel"
|
|
![]() |
|
Rupert ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 11 Aug 04 Location: Whitefriars sc Online Status: Offline Posts: 8956 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Neither of those clauses really fits, though, does it? The classes are involved in the race - they are fully paid up entries, so the one about masters of vessels is of no account, and the spectator one doesn't fit either, though it is closer.
Just a general sense of fair play would appear to be enough, or should be. |
|
Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686
|
|
![]() |
|
Contender443 ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 01 Oct 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1211 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Having read the report from The Firebird skipper he "started" even though his class was cancelled. His reasoning was that he could not hear the instructions over his VHF and I guess this was the same for many of the sail arounds.
I small sportsboat or multi can be a very noisy place in a F5/6 and you will be concentrating on your start and watching for other boats.
|
|
Bonnie Lass Contender 1764
|
|
![]() |
|
blueboy ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 27 Aug 10 Online Status: Offline Posts: 512 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I've sailed a sport boat not that dissimilar to a J80 in breeze steadily in the mid-30s and making progress upwind wasn't easy. I've sailed J80s a few times and frankly, the thought of skippering one in 13 foot waves and 41 knots of breeze isn't appealing, no matter what the RCD might have to say. However in the conditions prevailing on June 30th, I don't think a well-sailed J80 would have too many problems. Having skippered and crewed the RTIR a number of times on sports boats, I was extremely surprised it was cancelled for the class. |
|
![]() |
|
blueboy ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 27 Aug 10 Online Status: Offline Posts: 512 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I was on the water at Hayling and I'm afraid that's a wee exaggeration. Chimet showed just shy of 28 knots once, at 0635. J80s would have been arriving at the nastiest bit at St Cats perhaps 3 hours after the start i.e. around 1000 and by then gusts were around 20-23. Dinghy-windy but not really keelboat-windy. Edited by blueboy - 09 Jul 12 at 5:35pm |
|
![]() |
|
sargesail ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 14 Jan 06 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1459 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Well I'm glad I couldn't take up the offer to do the race on a J80, because I was flying to Scotland to take a boat from Wick to Ullapool round Muckle Flugga. Because this decision would have made my blood boil......
Because the J80 is so very different from the open cockpit sports boats, and so much more seaworthy than the 1/4 tonners. I wonder if this was a bad decision made on accurate information, or a sensible decison made on bad information/understanding. Hard to understand anyone who knows the J80 making the call to abandon them and let 1/4 tonners race.
|
|
![]() |
|
JimC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6660 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Seems easy enough to understand to me if the Quarter Tonners are Category 4 qualified and the J80s are not, as seems to be the case. Don't the the Cat 4 boats have a variety of extra heavy weather gear the others don't have? Edited by JimC - 09 Jul 12 at 9:49pm |
|
![]() |
|
sargesail ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 14 Jan 06 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1459 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Well it can be, and many are Cat 4 rated. As shown a few posts back it seems it may have been caused by misnaming the J80 a dayboat!
|
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 78910> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |