New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: Extreme 40 crash decision
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Extreme 40 crash decision

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 789
Author
ASok View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 26 Sep 07
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 739
Post Options Post Options   Quote ASok Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Extreme 40 crash decision
    Posted: 10 Aug 11 at 12:22pm
More importantly, two crew members hanging upside down in the water and the tactician is just hell bent on waving the protest flag! Surely helping your buddies on first would have been the decent thing to do!
Back to Top
Andymac View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 04 Apr 07
Location: Derbyshire
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 852
Post Options Post Options   Quote Andymac Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 Aug 11 at 8:51am
As Quangers says,
Roth was under no obligation to 'anticipate ' that Art would tack.
Art did not assume any rights until it was on a Starbord tack close hauled course (it had lost its same tack, clear ahead status when it passed head to wind.
Despite starting to avoid Art before it had assumed rights, Roth still didn't manage to avoid the collision.
Art has failed to provide time and opportunity for Roth to keep clear. Q.E.D.
 
Back to Top
Quagers View Drop Down
Far too distracted from work
Far too distracted from work
Avatar

Joined: 24 Oct 06
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 279
Post Options Post Options   Quote Quagers Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 Aug 11 at 9:47pm
A better question is what more would you expect Rothschilds to do to avoid them? Make their boat disappear? As far as the rules are concerned the mark has absolutely nothing to do with this and it boils down to Dont tack in front of someone!

A more official explanation is that Roth doesn't need to start avoiding until Art is on a close hauled course on the new tack, they then have to have 'time and opportunity' to take avoiding action. If you watch the video you will see they start taking avoiding action while Art is still tacking, so Art has already fouled before the crash occurs.

Edited to add how I see it:

10sec Art starts to tack
14sec Art passes head to wind and becomes 'tacking boat' and has no rights
16sec Roth starts to try to bear away
18sec Art gets to close hauled
21sec Collision


Edited by Quagers - 09 Aug 11 at 9:52pm
Back to Top
rb_stretch View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 23 Aug 10
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 742
Post Options Post Options   Quote rb_stretch Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 Aug 11 at 9:24pm
There was an incident with the Extreme 40s captured in this video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bJpFueH1wvQ

Rothschilds protested and won. What I can't figure out is what was Artemis supposed to do. They were clear ahead on the same tack. They needed to tack for the mark as Rothschild would need to as well. They looked like the had completed the tack, before the collision. What could Artemis have done in the situation??


Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 789

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.665y
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz
Change your personal settings, or read our privacy policy