Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
RS400 proposed changes |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 678910 29> |
Author | |
Guests ![]() Guest Group ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 12 Oct 10 at 9:42pm |
Agreed. The jib looks horrid - I notice the XI had a similar jib from Hyde, so presumably it's their latest thing. The main looks okay, but is the cloth as durable? As to whether the changes are sensible or necessary, I suppose if they don't update someone else may introduce a 400 beater (Icon with a kite?). If the 4000 had modernised perhaps the Alto would never have come to be?
|
|
![]() |
|
JimC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Not a very successful job of editing the jib, but never mind eh. I tweaked the logo just for merlin boy (next post) took the sail numbers off and tweaked the roach a bit compared to earlier version. Edited by JimC - 12 Oct 10 at 11:06pm |
|
![]() |
|
Merlinboy ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 03 Jul 06 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 3169 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
And the kite appears to be stuck under the sail numbers....Nice Jim lol
Edited by Merlinboy - 13 Oct 10 at 6:28am |
|
![]() |
|
Nick Peters ![]() Posting king ![]() Joined: 08 Feb 06 Location: England Online Status: Offline Posts: 192 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Oh the joy of diverse opinion! - 2 days of sailing the boat and we had dozens of positive comment and a few pics on here and it is ripped to shreds! Still that is what is needed to gather opinion.
I'm sure a few weeks of consultation and some tweaking of ideas and there should be something solid to vote on. Class's choice either way. Some positive ideas would always help from this pool of free thinkers - how would you react to a request for some straight forward retrofittable improvements and more modern looking sails - and yes Jim I know you think the main is too big! But we would need to keep it the same size really.
|
|
Nick
|
|
![]() |
|
Slippery Jim ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 24 Nov 09 Location: Germany Online Status: Offline Posts: 586 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Nick,
What about keeping the mast upright and moving a bit further back on a reach - it might help!?!?!
I'd suggest that the only thing the roach does is add a bit more power for light winds. If you want to have a really automatic rig you've gotta have either twin spreaders or a really tapered mast, the latter of which is only good for a narrow range of crew weight.
|
|
Pass the skiff, man!
|
|
![]() |
|
Nick Peters ![]() Posting king ![]() Joined: 08 Feb 06 Location: England Online Status: Offline Posts: 192 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
when asked back in the summer why not experiment with a new look fore and aft sailplan within existing areas and performance, I sat down with Mike Lennon....conclusions were...
1. modern laminate - better visibility, less cost, fresher look.
2. square top - try to make the same area more "automatic". Maybe more efficient - but that might end up faster.
3. Jib radial cut for greater longevity, Huge window for less crashes.
4. More adjustable mast ram for optimising to your weight more easily around the track.
the pole and single line system (the tapered carbon makes this work so it is realistic) is a recent idea and simply aligns the boat with modern systems. this should make life loads easier for the crew. Lets see if people agree as they sail the boat.
Carbon boom is just pleasant - lighter through tacks and gybes, wont corrode, and they are more acheivable now costwise. the 300 class is keen for one i gather, and it could be the same with adifferent front end. It made a real difference to the 700 and 100.
|
|
Nick
|
|
![]() |
|
Nick Peters ![]() Posting king ![]() Joined: 08 Feb 06 Location: England Online Status: Offline Posts: 192 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
the ali pole would work but with more friction: this was tried 15 years ago, but parked then as it was thought a tapered pole was required.
Boom is meant to be same length - foot length the same.
Jib is the same - just radial cut and big window....
Bend control would help get most out of both mains - but only if you use it right!
Do we want to be adjusting the rig more? - well that is for you guys (the owners) to decide. We are only chucking ideas out there. Idea is to broaden appeal and weight band?
Also we are aware the current deck control is not a well liked bit of kit.
|
|
Nick
|
|
![]() |
|
JimC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I had a tapered alloy pole on my Cherub over twenty years ago... I don't know what relative prices of tapered alloy to carbon would be though. It had started life as an alloy sailboard mast.
|
|
![]() |
|
Guests ![]() Guest Group ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Can you confirm that there would be NO changes to the "Wing Wang" arrangement or is that part of the suggestion too?
In other words, the only change to the spinny pole setup would be a carbon replacement?
Timg
|
|
![]() |
|
RS400atC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 04 Dec 08 Online Status: Offline Posts: 3011 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
If half the fleet changes its look, that will not happen.
I use older sails for club racing or windy events, so it will be some years before everyone is the same again.
|
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 678910 29> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |