Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
The new Laser b**tard |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 678910 14> |
Author | ||
PeterG ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 12 Jan 08 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 822 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 18 Jan 13 at 1:04pm |
|
The total numbers aren't relevant anyway. What matters is that nothing is coming forward to supersede it, despite there being many attempts.
I think the total numbers are relevant there - the total numbers are a big reason why it goes on being successful - if you want to be able to go to pretty much any club in the country and do class racing then sail a Laser, that's one of the great attractions and one that's it's very, very hard for a new class to compete with. 4000 boats is not a lot world wide, when you take out the ones used in regattas and ones owned by national sailing federations. 4000 boats per year is a very large number. That is a lot more than most classes could dream of having in their entire lifespan.
|
||
Peter
Ex Cont 707 Ex Laser 189635 DY 59 |
||
![]() |
||
tick ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() Joined: 16 Nov 12 Online Status: Offline Posts: 223 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I am not entirely sure of my facts here but did Laser not have a good start over other "modern" boats. I bet they looked very cool when compared with a wooden Solo, probably cheaper as well. Did not Laser come in with a bang and a major manufacturer to support it? It must have been a far cry when compared with someone knocking out hulls in an old chicken shed and looking for market share. Once established.....
I had a 1970's TVR in the 1970's, very nice but built in a shed. For the same money I could have had an MGB.....I chose the TVR but more people chose the MGB.
|
||
![]() |
||
robin34024 ![]() Posting king ![]() ![]() Joined: 03 Jan 12 Location: Lincoln Online Status: Offline Posts: 116 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I am not entirely sure of my facts here but did Laser not have a good start over other "modern" boats. I bet they looked very cool when compared with a wooden Solo, probably cheaper as well. Did not Laser come in with a bang and a major manufacturer to support it?
exactly how i feel. the laser was designed in 1969, just 13 years after the enterprise, and far cheaper and higher in performance than a lot of other boats of the time. this created a class, which meant that more and more people joined in for racing. as time went on, however, the laser has become outdated, and unlike other 'one design' classes, where little changes are made over time, the laser has been left as a strict one design, essentially the same as it was in 1969. now i think that very few people race lasers competitively because of the merits of the boat, just fpr the huge class it has grown.
|
||
![]() |
||
Bootscooter ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 15 May 07 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1094 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I hope it doesn't change, tbh.
Because (other than the XD upgrade) it has stayed essential the same throughout it's life, it is this that is a major contributor to it's longevity. Don't get me wrong - I really don't like the boat... love the racing, hate the boat, so what I want to see is a new design, similar in ethos but without it's faults and with many of the improvements suggested here built in to it. I want this boat to be vigerously marketed, priced considerably lowerm and with massive constructor support to establish a successful circuit. I want a consistantly well built product that is backed up with an excellent customer-service dept. I want this to be a boat that will make all the club racing laser sailors that only continue to persist with the thing because it's the only single-handed class racing available, decide that they should by the better, faster, more comfortable alternative, because there's a deal where the 1st 5/6 at any club get a significant discount. Hurry up Steve!!!!
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
bustinben ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() Joined: 15 Oct 06 Online Status: Offline Posts: 288 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Personally, I view its shortcomings as its strengths. It's a total pig to get round the course at decent speed in the breeze, the rudder doesn't work very well, it's hard to tack and gybe with any elegance and getting it upwind through chop is an art form.
That's what gives it such depth. There is *always* a way of doing it better, no matter how fast you're going. A "point and shoot" boat without any shortcomings is dull by comparison. Yes, it's a crappy design, but who cares? If I wanted outright speed and comfort I'd stay in my car.
Edited by bustinben - 18 Jan 13 at 3:28pm |
||
![]() |
||
The Moo ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 01 Jun 06 Online Status: Offline Posts: 809 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I have recently done some racing in my old man's Laser which predates the XD spec by a long time. First time I have sailed one in anger for many years. Have to say it made a pleasant change to the agonising over the myriad adjustments required in the N12
Quite looking forward to the next sail and really not to fussed about its foibles. |
||
![]() |
||
Bootscooter ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 15 May 07 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1094 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
That's true of many other boats also - it's the foibles that give each Class (and individual boats in some cases - not lasers, obviously ![]() I'd still rather be sailing my OK though.
|
||
![]() |
||
Wodman ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: 03 Oct 09 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 11 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Surely most of the above argument ignores the most compelling reason that people own and race their Lasers - which is that they are so easy to live with compared to most other Classes. My boat gets ignored for six months at a time when work, family, training, Youth Squad, Rugby commitments get in the way. Then I get an opportunity to get to the club and the boat is still where I left it and still as competitive. I don't have to worry that the coveris filling with rain, or has been blown askew when we have a gale, don't worry about the varnish or the boat filling with rainwater. I have even bought another rig (for peanuts) to allow me to sail when its blowing harder than I'd like.
As I've mostly had development or "loose" one-design classes previously, I can sympathise with the gripes about controls and don't get me started about the nonsense concerning rigging. But I go racing when I can and guess what? I find a dozen other people of all ages trying to remember how to race, and we enjoy ourselves. The age/value/shiny-ness of the boat seems to have little bearing on results as the best sailors always seem to be first. For me and many of my club mates, without the sheer convenience of the Laser, we would be ex-sailors mumbling about "the good-old days" and how we will get back into it one day! In summary, the Laser is not a particularly good boat to own and/or race - but it's a whole lot better than none at all!
|
||
Richard.
|
||
![]() |
||
RS400atC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 04 Dec 08 Online Status: Offline Posts: 3011 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
There seem to be a great many classes that do very well with very little change. Many of the classes that are introduced for change's sake seem to be transient. Some classes that change frequently like Cherubs and 14's restrict the real action to a few people who are prepared to buy a new boat and have it made obsolete in 5 years. OTOH, technology moves on, it may now (or Soon) be possible to put a carbon rig in the Laser without increasing the cost of ownership significantly. I think that is why the Morris Minor, 2CV etc were abolished, it became cheaper or more cost effective to build a 'better' car. |
||
![]() |
||
bustinben ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() Joined: 15 Oct 06 Online Status: Offline Posts: 288 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Well exactly, so why try and change it. It is what it is and people love it. There are some things that can be changed, because they don't change the character of the boat but at the same time do fix something that is fundamentally broken - carbon top section for example (although I would argue that the radial bottom section is a far more pressing issue). Messing with the rudder, making hiking more comfortable or anything else of that nature is a step too far.
|
||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 678910 14> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |