New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: Weight equalisation
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Weight equalisation

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 56789 13>
Author
tink View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 23 Jan 16
Location: North Hants
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 789
Post Options Post Options   Quote tink Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Weight equalisation
    Posted: 03 Jan 22 at 2:42pm
Originally posted by iGRF

Originally posted by tink

Originally posted by iGRF

So what’s now being suggested the Contender doesn’t need a wire and trapeze at all because you’re an Engineer and I’m in marketing?


You could fit wings on a contender and the crew could create the same righting moment as a trapezing crew, the key thing is where the crew c of g is. As a engineer this stuff is my bread and butter so my understanding of this stuff is rather relevant.


Well I would beg to differ, then what do I know, I've only spent thirty odd years marketing harnesses and harness hooks in wind and more recently kitesurfing where the idiosyncrasies are very different. So you'll excuse me for choosing to find out for myself, when I can find a suitable harness with the option to vary hook height.

As for fitting racks on a contender, or using your Toy example, they may very well apply sufficient righting force but they will be slower. If you are truly an expert engineer, then I shouldn't have to explain why, but if you wish, I'll try and find a better drawing programme to illustrate why.


I give up if you are not prepared to accept basic laws of physics I not going to try and change that
Tink
https://tinkboats.com

http://proasail.blogspot.com
Back to Top
iGRF View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 07 Mar 11
Location: Hythe
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6499
Post Options Post Options   Quote iGRF Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 Jan 22 at 3:09pm
Originally posted by Sam.Spoons


Originally posted by iGRF

As for fitting racks on a contender, or using your Toy example, they may very well apply sufficient righting force but they will be slower. If you are truly an expert engineer, then I shouldn't have to explain why, but if you wish, I'll try and find a better drawing programme to illustrate why.

Interested to hear your explanation?


The same reason a B14 would be faster with the crew twin trapezing, and why a windsurfer planes up wind earlier than a dinghy and a Cat is faster than a mono.


Because the centre of gravity of the boat with a crew flat wiring is moved to an extent that the boat displaces less at the point of contact with the water so creates less drag and therefore goes faster, the more the crew weight is part of the actual hull which occurs in hiking boats, then the displacement is entirely foccussed inboard.

Move that weight outboard and away you go..
Back to Top
iGRF View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 07 Mar 11
Location: Hythe
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6499
Post Options Post Options   Quote iGRF Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 Jan 22 at 3:12pm
Originally posted by tink



I give up if you are not prepared to accept basic laws of physics I not going to try and change that


Humans wrote the basic laws of physics and they have frequently been proved wrong.

That's the trouble with engineers, they only do as they're told and never question anything.

Rules are and have always been, made to be broken.

Edited by iGRF - 03 Jan 22 at 3:13pm
Back to Top
iGRF View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 07 Mar 11
Location: Hythe
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6499
Post Options Post Options   Quote iGRF Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 Jan 22 at 3:28pm
Originally posted by Do Different


Give it up people, there's nothing to be gained here.    iGRF has an undoubted history of being a demon windsurfer and marketeer but time and time again he has demonstrated that he entirely missed out on secondary school physics lessons. I have respect for skills and wish him well with his Contender experience.


I entered the Grammar School in the A stream, passed Physics at O level, questioned the physics master on his definition of light at the time 1964-5 and was proved right many years later. Have an IQ according to some of 166. (stupid logic puzzles) Question everything always, sometimes I'm right, sometimes I'm wrong, have probably been wrong more often than right, but that's not reason to stop questioning.

I do come here for a laugh, I don't take anything too seriously, but I hesitate to accept suggestions of not being as well educated or as bright as the rest of you. I just never ever accept the status quo and none of you have provided a convincing argument supporting the fact that a trapeze wire set further away from the boat does not provide better righting moment.

Do we have to re run the lee bow argument that proved my point?

Back to Top
tink View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 23 Jan 16
Location: North Hants
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 789
Post Options Post Options   Quote tink Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 Jan 22 at 3:31pm
Originally posted by iGRF

 


Because the centre of gravity of the boat with a crew flat wiring is moved to an extent that the boat displaces less at the point of contact with the water so creates less drag and therefore goes faster,

Please explain where the weight has gone that has caused the boat to displace less, it simply is against the laws of physics which you appear to have no regard for. 
Tink
https://tinkboats.com

http://proasail.blogspot.com
Back to Top
Do Different View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more


Joined: 26 Jan 12
Location: North
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1312
Post Options Post Options   Quote Do Different Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 Jan 22 at 3:42pm
iGRF. I did not say that you are not a bright bloke, which you obviously are and an innovator.
However. Sometimes you are simply plain wrong on the most basic theory.

Back to Top
iGRF View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 07 Mar 11
Location: Hythe
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6499
Post Options Post Options   Quote iGRF Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 Jan 22 at 3:43pm
Let's start in say 5 knots, with a 90 kilo crew sat in our Contender which weighs say 110 kgs all up, so 200 kgs point loaded.

Move the wind speed up to say 15 knots our crew has clipped in but is still pretty in board knees bent but part of his weight is going down directly through the mast via the trap wire, with maybe 10% less because he can lean out board.

Now move the wind speed up to say twenty five knots and our crew is flat wiring, his weight now directly supported via the wire, supported not entirely by the mast directed down through the hull, but in part supported by the wind side force. So where has the weight gone? It has spread over a wider area, like the twin cat hulls and in part supported by the mast and the calculation for this is something my maths can't extend to, but I'm sure is out there somewhere, don't make me look for it. But I can assure you is faster than if the weight were still supported directly by racks attached to the hull.



Edited by iGRF - 03 Jan 22 at 3:48pm
Back to Top
iGRF View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 07 Mar 11
Location: Hythe
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6499
Post Options Post Options   Quote iGRF Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 Jan 22 at 3:54pm
Originally posted by Do Different

iGRF. I did not say that you are not a bright bloke, which you obviously are and an innovator.
However. Sometimes you are simply plain wrong on the most basic theory.


This time I'm not wrong, I may not be correct in the harness hook positioning on my person, but the ([s]argument[/s]) discussion has gone beyond that, 'they' are now questioning the efficiency of a trapeze and how it functions and are wrong. Racks do not work the same as a Trapeze and unless you understand that, in my mind the argument against my higher hook theory also fails, though I suspect is probably right for altogether different reasons to do with the percentage of weight loss the further up the body you go, yet the bending knees fact still supports the attachment point being as far out as you can get. Why I'm still hanging on for a definitive answer.

Edited by iGRF - 03 Jan 22 at 3:56pm
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 Jan 22 at 4:27pm
Interesting isn’t it?  Lots of people have told you that you are wrong about moving the trapeze attachment outboard increasing righting moment but no one has really explained why.  
Back to Top
sargesail View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 14 Jan 06
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1459
Post Options Post Options   Quote sargesail Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 Jan 22 at 4:29pm
Originally posted by iGRF

Originally posted by Do Different


Give it up people, there's nothing to be gained here.    iGRF has an undoubted history of being a demon windsurfer and marketeer but time and time again he has demonstrated that he entirely missed out on secondary school physics lessons. I have respect for skills and wish him well with his Contender experience.


I entered the Grammar School in the A stream, passed Physics at O level, questioned the physics master on his definition of light at the time 1964-5 and was proved right many years later. Have an IQ according to some of 166. (stupid logic puzzles) Question everything always, sometimes I'm right, sometimes I'm wrong, have probably been wrong more often than right, but that's not reason to stop questioning.

I do come here for a laugh, I don't take anything too seriously, but I hesitate to accept suggestions of not being as well educated or as bright as the rest of you. I just never ever accept the status quo and none of you have provided a convincing argument supporting the fact that a trapeze wire set further away from the boat does not provide better righting moment.

Do we have to re run the lee bow argument that proved my point?



Bubbles tell us about the bubbles please…

And then we’ll move on to laughing at your Lee bow vanity!
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 56789 13>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.665y
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz
Change your personal settings, or read our privacy policy