Laser 161752 Tynemouth |
![]() |
Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
Singlehanded BOX rule |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 34567> |
Author | ||
Rupert ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 11 Aug 04 Location: Whitefriars sc Online Status: Offline Posts: 8956 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 22 Dec 15 at 11:32am |
|
The symmetric grand prix.The idea came up as much as anything else to combat the big players with the assy boats, banding together the fast boats to make a united stand. They still raced separately though, didn't they? A Fireball won't beat a 505. The Concept was called fastsail. Slowsail, for all the 11 and 12 foot singlehanders would have been fun. |
||
Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686
|
||
![]() |
||
chrisg ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 23 Mar 07 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 893 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Some people may know my preference for handicap racing, which is probably good as I have a little bit to do with the PY system.
I think the previous suggestions of the single handed box rule have never really gotten off the ground as they have always included the statement "instead of racing handicap, race scratch". I've never really understood this exclusive rather than inclusive approach. As someone who prepares multiple sets of results for my club, it would be so straightforward to dual score a series grouping all of the singlehanders together in one series with no handicaps applied. This approach would keep the people happy who want to race handicap, and those that aren't interested in handicap race results have a separate file showing series results with no handicap applied. What I struggle to come to terms with is that while the handicap system isn't perfect it does go a long way to ironing out the differences in performances over the different conditions we might face. I'm lucky as I sail one of the faster boats on the list (would probably need the biggest box to put it in as well) and I have a pretty good idea that I would beat a Farr 3.7 over the water in my 300 every time (no disrespect to Farr sailors anywhere - that's just an example). Is that fair on the Farr sailor? Why would he bother to turn up every Sunday? Messing with the boats rigs to equalise them would cost a lot of people a lot of money so who would sign up for that? Are you going to suggest improvements to make a Farr as quick as a 300, or are you going to slow my boat down? No thanks. If a box rule was the only option available with no handicap adjustment I'd lose all interest in sailing and would probably go and spend my time doing something else instead. Likewise if fleet racing was the only option at my club - the only boat I might be vaguely be competitive in would be a flying fifteen and i'd rather pull my toe nails off with a pair of rusty pliers one by one than sail one of those every week. So I guess my point is not to constantly belittle the handicap system, saying it cannot be taken seriously etc etc, but work with it and your results people at your club. If they are using sailwave and you want fleets scored in a different way it would take a few minutes additional work to sort out and no added future burden as you still only input finishing times and lap counts once per race in the future and the program works everything else out. If a group of people are interested in doing it why not just try it? Be inclusive rather than exclusive. Maybe I'm the odd one out as I still don't quite understand the appeal of racing classes with large disparities in speed scratch against each other. If you have a free PY system to use why not just use it and if the numbers aren't working on your water for whatever reason tweak them. The tools are available. And if someone says oh the people at our club wouldn't ever want us to mess with the numbers dual score again. Its so simple. Have a series scored with normal handicaps to keep those people happy, and have another series scored with modified numbers to keep those people happy. It's about being inclusive not exclusive again and so easy to do. Anyway, Happy Christmas everyone! Edited by chrisg - 22 Dec 15 at 11:41am |
||
![]() |
||
JimC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
SGP
http://www.yachtsandyachting.com/news/10589 The idea was a multi class event strictly for pole kite boats, I think something similar was also tried for single string asymmettrics. The concept feels as if it ought to be a good idea, but in practice both seem to have died off after the initial burst of enthusiasm, so I suspect it doesn't have legs in practice. I think the trouble may have been that the classes that had numbers preferred to promote single class events, and the classes that didn't have numbers didn't have enough to keep the events going. |
||
![]() |
||
ventus ![]() Groupie ![]() Joined: 10 Jul 15 Online Status: Offline Posts: 43 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Couldn't agree more, Chris g. Spot on.
![]() ![]() |
||
![]() |
||
turnturtle ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 05 Dec 14 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2538 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
a very well reasoned post Chris, thank you. A couple of point though, by having separate scoring systems, are you not running the risk that people are on the same course with very much different agendas. I know on the odd time I take handicap racing seriously, I know my best strategy is to stay squeaky clean and minimise the boat-on-boat interaction- that means not pushing starts, not luffing, not taking a hit on clean air to cover and hold position on those behind etc. Whereas in class racing, or scratch racing, all those tactics come in to play. That's what the appeal of fleet racing is. I mean seriously how many people at our club, and others, do you think really, really enjoy the laser sailing experience (reaching in a F4 and wavelets excluded). Secondly the administrative burden of recording times has got to be off-putting. I know our club struggles for folks who feel confident enough to be PRO, I would have thought a laser start, fast group and slow group would make things a whole lot easier to manage, especially if the requirement for taking times was removed. I know from experience that the times recorded can be a little, ahem, sketchy to say the least. It's been that way in every club I've been a member of. My only experience of racing scratch in non-class boars was on RS100s (8.4s and 10.2s.... we just all raced together and had category prizes at the end.) It really, really worked and is a shame the class didn't have the foresight just to do away with the rules relating to the two 'class iterations'. The whole thing dogged the class from the outset and as it happens history has repeated itself... there's only one dominant rig now, as is the case with the B rig RS300. I wonder if the Aeros would rather all race together with category prizes, or whether they prefer separate starts? Genuine question...? What is actually happening on this front? There's no 'right' or 'wrong' answer, however as data set of forward thinking dinghy sailors, it would be interesting to see what they are now doing when it comes to the 'fleets' at their traveller events. I also raced boards scratch- multiple different types of platform, different rigs... all racing together. I was on a slower board than the rest in the top ten/twenty, but it didn't stop me fighting and working harder to keep a decent overall position, two years in a row. Further down the fleet were SUP boards with rigs, freestyle boards, formula boards, slalom kit and even some old kelp dredgers from Grumpf's era. Category prizes ensured there was something for everyone to have a go at- as you say, inclusivity being key. The overall event vibe was excellent, despite quite sh*tty light winds - I've been three times now - easily the best sailing event I've ever attended. I can't help but think the whole feeling and vibe would be utterly destroyed if the race officer implemented a handicapping system for each board. Conversely I do wonder if the same concept could apply to dinghies too- I see no reason in the equipment why it couldn't and wouldn't in turn be equally as successful. It's just the 'group think' of the people concerned who would be the barrier. |
||
![]() |
||
turnturtle ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 05 Dec 14 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2538 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
just found the answer to that RS Aero question:
http://www.rssailing.com/en/news/rs-aero-gains-world-sailing-class-status
separate starts... oh well, with over 800 sold and full ISAF class recognition, in what, 18 months!!??!! ... well they must be doing something better than the rest!!!! |
||
![]() |
||
chrisg ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 23 Mar 07 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 893 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
James,
I still don't get why people say writing a time down at the end of a race is difficult or complicated though. It really isn't. How long is it since you last did an OD duty? They've stuck stopwatches to the top of the clipboards now and everything, so as the person reads out the sail number of the boat crossing the line and hoots you just glance at the stop watch and note the time down. It really, really, is not difficult. We haven't been struggling for PRO's as far as I know since the implementation of dutyman a couple of years ago though have we? So it seems to me that the excuses were more just about people being told to do a certain date than actually picking a date to do.... Agree that different tactics come in to play but some of our hottest fleet sailors say they enjoy our Wednesday nights as when they get in the lead they have to remember to push to the end of the race to ensure a good handicap position as well as fleet position. If they were only fleet racing they'd slap a cover on the next boat after the first mark and that would be there evening done. You still need to push the start in a handicap race as every second counts. As for luffing, well that's a proper mugs game. You luff a faster boat in a handicap race - whats the point, you luff another boat in the laser fleet and three others sail under you. No idea why people still try this, I'm pretty certain I've yet to see it applied at all effectively. It seems to me its usually mid-fleeters (where I am) that engage in pointless luffing battles to gain one place and usually end up letting others through. The fastest sailors I know try to avoid interaction with other boats wherever possible, fleet or handicap racing. I honestly don't know anyone who would realistically want to race scratch against boats of other classes, other than you. If you owned the quicker boat it would be a hollow victory, if you owned the slower one what incentive do you have to keep turning up and getting trounced by the quicker one? Handicap racing isn't perfect but I'm sure it makes the results a damn site closer than they'd be racing scratch.
|
||
![]() |
||
turnturtle ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 05 Dec 14 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2538 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
If we are talking generically, then I guess the guy that started the thread would be one. I know Peaky's interested in the concept and I have chatted with others who show some signs of thinking the ideas of box rules and existing dinghy classes coming under category umbrellas have merits - but you are absolutely spot on to say this view is very much a minority stand point, hence why I regret to say the OP is punching a brick wall. As for our club, I agree with a lot of what you say. We still have very active fleet racing in multiple classes for those that want it, and handicap racing for everyone else. My comments on this thread are generally aimed at being more generic- I think all the other clubs around us are handicap only these days. Thats not a good 'fall back' position if we go 'Bewl' or get ripped off like Chew, I doubt our pocket would run as deep. But anyway, let's hope that's not going to happen! We have the best of both worlds in my opinion. The fact that I can put the laser down for a season or two and get some racing/race training on my board in a mixed fleet is very, very welcome. Much as I may like to think that out of the ether springs a fleet of something new and exciting, (not fussy... there's at least 10 classes I would join as the 11th deposit down), I'm also very much aligned to ensuring the Laser doesn't lose momentum... I'll probably buy another one in a season or two once circumstances change or I have had enough of racing boards / traveling to board racing events. My comment on struggling for PROs came from the horses mouth when I signed up to Dutyman this season... I won't do the PRO duty, but happy to take on the role of Assistant... but probably not a discussion for here, suffice to say my experiences have been similar to those closer to your home. As for taking times, I remain unconvinced that they are recorded all that accurately. They never have been when I've witnessed it, and that's most certainly not exclusively at Draycote, if anything our PROs take it more seriously than another club I was at in the not so distant past, and certainly a hell of a lot more seriously than clubs I was a member of years ago.
Edited by turnturtle - 22 Dec 15 at 3:09pm |
||
![]() |
||
pompeysailor ![]() Posting king ![]() Joined: 16 Jul 07 Online Status: Offline Posts: 101 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
"If you owned the quicker boat it would be a hollow victory, if you owned the slower one what incentive do you have to keep turning up and getting trounced by the quicker one?"
How about including into the box rules that handicaps cannot be faster than say 1000, so it would keep existing classes in touch with any new developments. secondly: From my experiences most sailors would like to sail against others who sail the same boat. However if I was the only Blaze sailor racing in a mixed handicap fleet, while there was 6 Aero's who had their own start, I would prefer to race against similar speed boats and pitch myself against them. NOW consider 200 boats all racing with similar speed and multiple prizes on a equal basis. Yes some rockstars will get the latest / greatest, but many sailors will sail what they like/prefer and just enjoy racing in big fleets on an equal basis. |
||
Formerly - OK 2145 Phantom 1437, Blaze 819, Fireball 14668, Mirror 54145
|
||
![]() |
||
iGRF ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 07 Mar 11 Location: Hythe Online Status: Offline Posts: 6499 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Hey I swear it was some old kelp dredger from my era wot won one of those races you cheeky git, oh and I pretty much agree with the entire sentiment of chrisgs excellent post, my only gripe has been well documented elsewhere and no point re gurgitating.
I would however support another look at the way it's all organised, via an ARSE (Association of Racing Sailboats Executive ![]() |
||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 34567> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |