Lightning ?

Who is doing that then? 

For a start all the lentilists who are campaigning for lower speed limits on roads, more speed cameras etc.  I agree that one solution to the position we are in now is to put speed limits at such a level that even with people tailgaiting, suddenly changing lanes without looking or indicating (which I've seen numerous times in the last week); and to allow for the worst case scenario when visibility is down to 40m or so.  But this would put speed limits at about 30 on motorways!  It would be the next step towards a nanny state society that is well on its way already.

What we need to do (imo) is retrain drivers to think, but not about whether they are over an arbitrary limit, but about what speed is safe considering the car, their ability as a driver and the conditions at the time; and in some situations that is higher than current limits.  I would like to see traffic police given the funding instead of camera partnerships; because cameras don't pick up me doing 75 while trailing the boat, they don't catch people tailgating, and they don't catch people who shouldn't have passed their test.

Thats enough of a rant about motoring.  The winter before last, while I was still at school (in 6th form) the heating in the school broke down.  Strickly speaking the school should have closed because of the temperature in the buildings; it didn't but I know of other schools that did in similar circumstances.  Whats wrong with wearing a t-shirt under your shirt, or a jumper on top I wonder.  It is absolutely daft and such rules/legislation (whatever they are) shouldnt have been implemented in the first place.

Not really, no.  But you asked who was trying to create a society that was as risk free as possible and I was mearly obliging.