Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
Dinghy popularity |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 2728293031 38> |
Author | |||
Fearful ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: 30 Jul 12 Location: Kent Online Status: Offline Posts: 19 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 05 Jul 13 at 11:45am |
||
A thames barge. Edited by Fearful - 05 Jul 13 at 11:46am |
|||
![]() |
|||
Noah ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 29 Dec 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 611 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
BM on way too many steroids. |
|||
Nick
D-Zero 316 |
|||
![]() |
|||
Rupert ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 11 Aug 04 Location: Whitefriars sc Online Status: Offline Posts: 8956 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Am I alone in liking it?! A valid attempt at a fast, wide, stable hull without the problems brought about by sailing a multihull. Certainly needed a 2nd version, but it gets round one of the major problems of lightweight hulls (or at least it should have been light) which is lack of static stability.
Mind, I'm not 100% certain why a Sprint/Dart 15 wasn't an easier solution! |
|||
Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Pierre ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 15 Mar 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1532 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
No, you're not alone Rupert. I would love to have seen it in a decent blow with the rig tweaked properly.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
maxibuddah ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 06 Mar 09 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1760 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Top sides of a trident class submarine?
I liked it too to be honest. I wish it had worked and at least grf have it a go |
|||
Everything I say is my opinion, honest
|
|||
![]() |
|||
yellowwelly ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 24 May 13 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2003 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
but, (trying to keep this on topic), would a refined version of this boat make sailing more popular?
- faster - more stable - easier to sail than a Laser/Solo etc. I don't think so. I'd also say that adding all the extra string and sails even makes it easier to sail particularly. If I'm being honest, the only innovative boats I've seen recently which I think could be marketed to appeal to newbies & returners are the iCon, Punk and possibly the Shaw 4.0 down under. The L2K could be on that list if it did the future proofing thing of knocking the weight right down.... which it won't as the people who cotnrol the decision are the existing owners with their vested interests in maintaining the value of their toys. The other boat I really wish was more popular is the Megabyte... nice and simple for a big lads boat, a cost effective 'Finn' type boat, aimed squarely at big Laser sailors without stays and tuning etc. That would appeal far more now than it did a couple of years ago and could be the perfect inland boat for 90kg + guys who want simple sailing.
Edited by yellowwelly - 05 Jul 13 at 12:42pm |
|||
![]() |
|||
Rupert ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 11 Aug 04 Location: Whitefriars sc Online Status: Offline Posts: 8956 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
It might be that particular dinghies will encourage people to return to the sport, but I don't think newcomers will see a particular design and go "I've never wanted to sail, but now I've seen THAT boat, I think I'll have a go". More likely they will have seen Ben on the telly or in the paper or whatever, and think "Maybe I'll give sailing a go". A Pico looks pretty much like a Finn to a non sailor, I expect.
|
|||
Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686
|
|||
![]() |
|||
yellowwelly ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 24 May 13 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2003 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
yep my wife thinks they all look the same too...even the lilac one looks the same as that damned out of class cherub, apart from the lilac of course.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
iGRF ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 07 Mar 11 Location: Hythe Online Status: Offline Posts: 6499 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Well as a total co incidence I've just put the phone down on a chap who reckons he might be able to get me the funding to progress to the next stage and maybe to even tap into Brighton University and their test tanks, wouldn't that have been better had I had access to that before committing to that heavy hunk of plastic.
To me I'm disappointed it was so heavy to lift around and obviously not that encouraged to fix it, since I'm now back enjoying crewed competition which always was the thing that most enamoured me to sitting down sailing, I don't mind being billy no mate but I've spent my life doing that windsurfing. I told you elsewhere how I met the guy who owned and sent back that sail because it was a total dog and didn't work for him on his vortex, so given that and all things it didn't go too bad, we certainly had it hustling along that time in Calshot, but to be honest our water is never exactly conducive to planing upwind and even off wind you do need a fair amount of power to overcome the uphill bits. That boat was never designed with the idea of newcomers or widening the appeal of sailing, quite the contrary, if you recall it was a design exercise in enabling someone of er 'challenged' weight and height to get round a course in a force five in a performance craft, that much I did achieve, sadly our beach is no friend to the likes of even it and she remains holed to this day and frankly to heavy to bother with any further. The next step would be to apply some of the same ideas to something lighter and maybe less grandiose on the performance scale, we'll see, I'm not finished just yet. |
|||
![]() |
|||
JimC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
But is that really appropriate for an entry level/general purpose boat? Few people are more pro light weight than I am, and I have no problems with owning a boat that's going to dent like crazy if you handle it carelessly. But a boat for the entry level/general purpose family role needs to be able to put up with a good deal of casual handling. I've been very influenced by watching a couple (in both senses) of my ex trainees get into a major row about the first scratch on a new boat. I don't want to see people having disagreements like that... Boats like that also need to be relatively cheap. So you've got to hit a delicate compromise between weight, durability and cost: the usual pick any two because you can't have all three... You could hit durability and weight with a Kevlar/medium density foam/carbon sandwich RS2000 or whatever its going to be called, but the cost would be horrendous. I think we need another jump in materials for the entry level/family boats in order to permit lighter craft, but I don't know where its going to come from. Maybe some sort of multilayer sandwich rotomoulding process, but don't ask me how it could be done... |
|||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 2728293031 38> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |