Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
Rossiter Pintail Mortagne sur Gironde, near Bordeaux |
![]() |
Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
Icon Class Association |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 2122232425 47> |
Author | ||
winging it ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 22 Mar 07 Online Status: Offline Posts: 3958 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 27 Feb 14 at 3:27pm |
|
In fairness the Cirrus webpage does say from £5,995 based on options, but is that current? I am quite fond of a non standard colour scheme.
|
||
the same, but different...
|
||
![]() |
||
oldbloke ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: 25 Aug 06 Online Status: Offline Posts: 11 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
iGRF asks "who are these people" . If you go to the results and the PY analysis pages of Starcross YC .You will find that one of them is Paul Bartlett who sailed Icon 18 at an average of 942!
Its only one boat and only a few races and thats the problem with statistics with insufficient numbers, but thats why it is an experimental PY and you have to start somewhere
So:_ real results by a real sailor in real races = must be true
|
||
![]() |
||
blaze720 ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 28 Sep 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1635 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I don't think GRF was referring to the sailors ! Anyway it is avery small sample you have there - Paul B is both 'well known' and outstanding and has been across many classes both one and two hull and for a good few years. I don't know Starcross but I would bet he would dominate small fleet competiton if helming most of the other local classes he faces as well ....
FYI - He bought Icon 18 off another west country crew who struggled to even keep up with good Tasars at their club. This is why averages are a good idea ... and large samples with hundreds of races included. Mike L. PS - Winging it .... Yes 'Current' - see you at the show then ? Edited by blaze720 - 27 Feb 14 at 4:12pm |
||
![]() |
||
winging it ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 22 Mar 07 Online Status: Offline Posts: 3958 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I had a good look over an Icon at the Brass Monkey, I think they were looking over the D One at the same time. Very smart. Yes I will come and have a look. I am trying to downsize and rationalise into a sensible fleet..
|
||
the same, but different...
|
||
![]() |
||
iGRF ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 07 Mar 11 Location: Hythe Online Status: Offline Posts: 6499 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I meant who are the people on the technical yardstick committee, I've had a nice long PM from JimC explaining some of my questions and it seems it gets down to time rather than any conspiracy I might imagine, but I still feel a controlled annual event with helms swapping and rabbit starts in as steady a wind environment that one could find would be a better solution, backed by some hard physical measurement evidence. |
||
![]() |
||
blaze720 ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 28 Sep 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1635 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Blimey - I'm partly agreeing with Greame again ... must be an age thing
![]() I would qualify his proposal however and limit it to just the very newest of classes so it is less demanding on all concerned. An occasional panel of 'the good and the wise' try out new boats on the water - the builders pay costs and get the boats 'there'. The numbers produced might still wind up the 'interested parties' of course. But it would be so much better than putting the onus on manufacturers and/or young class assciations - cos we/they get damned whatever figure they propose ! If they attract a few highly capable crews early the PN heads south very quickly and then regular club racers suffer .. or if they only attract 'intermediate' helms at first a bandit number is given real credibility for perhaps years. That is in part our current system, love it or not, until big samples become available. It would not ever replace the current returns approach - just augment it in the first couple of years to get things off to a more reasoned and realistic start and ONLY be applied to new experimental numbers. It would allow us to have 'better' first experimental number eary and, excuse the pun, allow us to then 'zero-in' more rapidly on reliable long term handicaps. Just a thought .... anyone got views ? Mike L. Edited by blaze720 - 27 Feb 14 at 5:29pm |
||
![]() |
||
Rupert ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 11 Aug 04 Location: Whitefriars sc Online Status: Offline Posts: 8956 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Many of "these people" have explained it all on here before, been insulted/disbelieved by a few posters on here and have given up trying to convince you that they aren't paid by Laser/whoever to fix the results. That Jim is willing to try again shows he must be Mother Teresa in disguise. |
||
Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686
|
||
![]() |
||
Jeremyc ![]() Posting king ![]() Joined: 27 Jul 09 Online Status: Offline Posts: 110 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Mike,
[Guys - just come along and see for yourself on the weekend - the 'site' mentioned above was presumably Peakys' original one from way back when he was involved and development was still running - maybe it should be taken down. I very much doubt if any club is using 1020 with the standard production boat and rig etc.] If you want numbers then this is the graph from the ICON stats submitted to PYS at Burghfield. Whilst I recognise that they have a low reliability value of 0.2 and that it does not take into account more than 8 different helms who have borrowed the boat the facts are still there. I suspect that they are still on the low side but think that sub 1000 is not unrealistic. It is laughable to me that when you first suggested the of 1020 you were adamant that it was not really any faster than the Tazar, yet now you back track and blame it on Peaky claiming it was never your idea at all.The arguments we had at Sailing committee meetings over that make me realise that any statistics can be bent to anyones benfit. Needless to say , you wanted some fact,well that chart below probably helps explain why the number is where it is at present. ![]() |
||
N12- pure joy
D-Zero more pure joy |
||
![]() |
||
JimC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
The trouble is a one day or one weekend event is probably going to be worthless. You only have to look at major handicap event results to see why. Even a weeks event like ISAF class trials have been is going to be prone to weather problems. You have to have a variety of weather otherwise there's little point. Don't get me wrong: if the major manufacturers want to pay me generous expenses to come and sail their boats to demonstrate how fast they are with a reasonably typical overweight mid fleet helm on board then I'd probably be up for it, at least if it were somewhere reasonably local, but I'm not sure it would really prove any more than a basic paper exercise like the one I did above. Is all the leading data available for the D-one and the new RS yet? I'll happily have a go at a paper estimate and you can all laugh at me in two years time or whenever/if ever they get sufficient boats on the water to justify a published number. But I reckon I'll probably get to about +- 30 points (remember that's 2 or 3 points in the original PY system) and I bet that's at least as reliable as a one day only sailoff. I want waterline length, waterline beam, sail area, ideally luff length, overall length, overall beam and photos of the hulls upside down. Reckon that should be enough to get in the area. Really much the same as Dan does with his spreadsheet. |
||
![]() |
||
iGRF ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 07 Mar 11 Location: Hythe Online Status: Offline Posts: 6499 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Jeremy, what is that thing and how does it work? Not that I feel a place like Burghfield should set any trend at all, but it does precisely make my point that the wrong people are influencing this, how can a boat like that now have a fair race with a trapezed hull like the RS500 on open water? Can you sail a tack for more than two minutes in any direction at Burghfield without having to change direction? Do you even have trapeze boats racing there? I had a genuine interest in that boat, have gone to great lengths to get a demo set up for my club members here at Hythe, so what do I tell them now? Oh forget it a bunch of guys on a lake near Reading have decided it's faster than the other boat with any numbers at our club, the 500. Whatever generated that plot, is f**ked up, plain and simple, bin it. Edited by iGRF - 27 Feb 14 at 7:08pm |
||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 2122232425 47> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |