Which boat? |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1234 8> |
Author | |
jpbuzz591 ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 24 May 05 Location: England Online Status: Offline Posts: 793 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 19 Aug 05 at 11:32pm |
Down at chew there are quite a few Laser 4000's and a couple which race on sundays. Might be worth asking them if you can go out for a quick spin
|
|
Jp Indoe
Contender 518 Buzz591 Chew Valley Sailing club Bristol |
|
![]() |
|
49erGBR735HSC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 30 Mar 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1991 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4000 or Cherub seem the best bet. Wouldn't suggest the 5000, really
heavy and powerful and would be a bit of handful if you're not used to
trapezing, plus have a massive kite which you have to put into a bag
instead of having a spinnaker chute.
|
|
![]() |
|
CurlyBen ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 17 Aug 05 Location: Southampton Online Status: Offline Posts: 539 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yeah, I think I might go for the 4000 and get a bit more practice on an
assymetric boat, as it's a one design boat it means less decisions!
When I know a bit more about the boats I'll get myself a Cherub, see
what happens really. I need to try a few boats out I think, not sure
where to do that at the moment. I'd like to know if I can cope with a
twin wire boat, that's ultimately what I want to get into.
|
|
![]() |
|
49erGBR735HSC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 30 Mar 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1991 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
From what I've heard, the RS-800 isn't too much more difficult to sail
than the 4000, some people even say its easier. The sheet loads are
meant to be lower & twin stringing, you've got more leverage to
keep her upright. The 800 is well designed, utilises her sail area well
and is a really quick boat. In comparision to other skiffs, her sail
area is smallish, but she is one of the fastest. If you can afford to
get a boat with a lot of sails maybe go for an 800 because if your
ultimate aim is to get into twin wire boats, she'd be the perfect
introduction and you wouldn't have to sell a single wire boat later on
to achieve your goal.
|
|
![]() |
|
CurlyBen ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 17 Aug 05 Location: Southampton Online Status: Offline Posts: 539 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thanks for that, that actually reminds me of a conversation I had with
a guy on the RS stand at the baot show a while back. He said that I'd
be able to sail it without too much difficulty, but getting max
performance out of it was much harder. Saw a comparison of the 800 and
the 49er somewhere, that was saying that the 49er was much harder to
sail for a fairly small speed increase. How do you find the 49er? have
you sailed an 800?
|
|
![]() |
|
49erGBR735HSC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 30 Mar 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1991 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I haven't actually sailed an 800 but we considered buying one when
moving class from the 5000. We talked to our local RS dealer and they
reccommended that for our weight (140-150kg) and coming from the 5000,
we should only really be looking at the 49er or I14 to get the most out
of our sailing. We've raced against 800 & they are much more
comfortable sail in light winds because of their hull shape and not
having such a big rig. There is a bit of a leap from the 800 to the
49er, considering the 49er carries much more sail and has more
skiff-like hull. The 800 seems to be relatively forgiving compared to
the 49er. The comparision that you read was probably the same one which
I saw in "Dinghy" magazine, & seemed to hit the nail on the head
between the differences in the boats.
|
|
![]() |
|
CurlyBen ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 17 Aug 05 Location: Southampton Online Status: Offline Posts: 539 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Is the 800 more suitable for lightweights then? I'm about 65, 70 at the
moment and I think people I'm likely to sail with will be a similar
weight. What was it about the 800 that meant he didn't recommend it?
I'm kinda suprised the dealer was turning away business! I'll have to
try and dig out a copy of that Dinghy article
|
|
![]() |
|
49erGBR735HSC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 30 Mar 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1991 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
He actually sails an 800 and was in a lower weight range than us
(slightly) and was saying we wouldn't be too competitive in all but
really windy conditions. I think where he was coming from was we'd be
the heavy guys in the 800 but about mid-range for the 49er. I think if
you're about 130-140kg you'd be an okay weight for the 800, maybe even
at the heavier end of the fleet which isn't too bad a thing because it
means you should be able to control the boat better when its windier.
We were also told that after sailing the 5000 competitively we might
find the 800 easy, boat handling wise where as the 49er would be a step
up and we'd enjoy her more.
|
|
![]() |
|
CurlyBen ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 17 Aug 05 Location: Southampton Online Status: Offline Posts: 539 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yeah, it would be nice to be control the boat in a breeze! Last year I
was helming a 420 in team races a lot, when it got blowy it was
interesting cos my crew was 8 stone and as it was team racing no
trapeze, and definitely no reefing! kept it right way up most of the
time though. I'm a bit torn now, as I really want the twin trapeze so
800 sounds best, but there's a lot more of a premium on them from the
prices I've seen so far. 4000s seem to start at about £1800, I haven't
seen 800s for less than £4000, and that's a lot more work to get it!
What did you think of the 5000 when you were sailing it? I'm just
interested, it looks like a fun boat to sail but it doesn't look as
easy to use as the more modern designs - especially things like bags
instead of chutes.
|
|
![]() |
|
49erGBR735HSC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 30 Mar 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1991 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
When we sailed the 5000, I loved her to bits. The major problem is they
are really heavy boats, weighing in at wayfarer weight. The rig is
pretty heavy too. You go for a swim and thats you basically messed up
your race, well thats what we found. The heavy rig, combined with the
sail area had us spending ages righting the boat using righting
lines. Another problem we had was that our club, at the time, was
sending us round triangular courses. With the bags, you need to be in
most cases sailing windward leeward courses to sail the boat to its
maximum potential. With any wind, you need to be sailing straight
downwind to be able to get the kite to sit at the windward side to drop
the kite. I valued the crew I was sailing with because he could pull
the kite round the front of the jib when we needed to and get the kite
into the bag as quick as possible. From a crewing point of veiw, I
reckon you need to be experienced to sail the 5000 effectively. Mind
you the 5000 was bomb proof and we never had to replace anything
through straight forward gear failures but we were always wishing she
had a kite chute, well the crew was.
|
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1234 8> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |