Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
Laser 161752 Tynemouth |
![]() |
Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
Hadron H2 |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 1011121314 32> |
Author | ||
turnturtle ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 05 Dec 14 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2538 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 11 Mar 16 at 9:30am |
|
the upfront spend is only one aspect to the true cost of boat ownership. So it's little disingenuous to cite a competitor price with a link to their website. The true cost is a calculation on running costs and depreciation. I'd say running costs could be equitable for both- good, well built boat with an exceptionally high-quality sail that I'd have every faith in providing seasons of competitive life. Secondly, I bet the insurance premiums aren't dissimilar, but I haven't checked. However the Ovington Phantom comes with a number of quite sizeable attributes to mitigate the risk on the depreciation aspect. - an active class association with a programme of traveller events and independent championships - local fleet racing, or at least other boats in handicap fleets to get proper racing against - access to training - a recently 'stabilised' PY (anyone moaning about the Phantom PY anymore???) - a tuning knowledge-base to get you up to speed as quickly as possible - an active community, both online and off, to assist you get more from your sailing, even if you don't plan to attend class events - known mast and sail combinations that are proven to extend the wind range / competitive weight range of the hull - other active builders: in the event Ovington no longer wish to support the class, then others are already in place to take it forward without loss in faith from the marketplace - an active range of sailmakers, offering price points and performance vs longevity options depending on your budget I am not saying these things are not ultimately attainable for the H2- and believe me we can agree to hoping that happens (it's a lovely boat you've got there!); but to compare pricing directly with an established class, is, imho, a little disingenuous.... there's far more to the 'product' than the boat itself!
Edited by turnturtle - 11 Mar 16 at 10:41am |
||
![]() |
||
PaulPoshW ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: 25 Jun 15 Online Status: Offline Posts: 32 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I agree it's difficult to compare costs to an established class like the Phantom, and until we know the class rules for the H2 running costs are very difficult to guess.
The Phantom having multi-brand sailmakers and mast suppliers is a great way of pushing the running costs up. You only have to look at the price of a competitive 'skinny' mast or 'fast' sail to work that out. It'll be interesting to see if the H2 follows this route or the one-design one. For me I'd probably still choose a Phantom, but only because there are a few at the club to race against. But for the time being I don't see either tempting me to part company with the 300 |
||
![]() |
||
iGRF ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 07 Mar 11 Location: Hythe Online Status: Offline Posts: 6499 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
When I first investigated it, it was 1071 presumably set by the wooden boat, personally if I were the designer I'd keep my PY counsell inside my yellow blazer pocket, and be like the X1/X0, stay under the parapet and hope they don't notice you, and certainly under no circumstances approach the b**tards for an EN. The more I think about it the more it would be best to have the manufacturer set a guideline and work to that and there needs to be a manfacturer approved register. I shall run it through the Peaky number generator and see what that spits out but I'm going to guess somewhere around 1040. which will see the PYAG group set it at 959 if they follow their normal form. Edited by iGRF - 11 Mar 16 at 10:50am |
||
![]() |
||
iiiiticki ![]() Far too distracted from work ![]() Joined: 06 Mar 16 Location: Derbyshire Online Status: Offline Posts: 206 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I see a group of tweed clad gentlemen (panama hats in summer) travelling the country in lovat green Range Rovers and smoking briar pipes whilst rigging.
|
||
![]() |
||
turnturtle ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 05 Dec 14 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2538 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
how f**king naive.... sorry to swear. A manufacturer may attempt to approach 'them' for an EN, but until a club does, and starts issuing some returns, 'they' won't give said manufacturer squat. Your lack of knowledge on the process of new classes gaining or not gaining an EN is astounding.... especially given your vociferous accusations of foul play around it.
Edited by turnturtle - 11 Mar 16 at 10:50am |
||
![]() |
||
Guests ![]() Guest Group ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Now you mention it, tweed is beginning to look attractive......
|
||
![]() |
||
chrisg ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 23 Mar 07 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 893 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
James, don't let facts get in the way of a good internet rant though......
|
||
![]() |
||
turnturtle ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 05 Dec 14 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2538 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
to be fair, when have I ever allowed that to happen...
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
iGRF ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 07 Mar 11 Location: Hythe Online Status: Offline Posts: 6499 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
So and I don't care what happens now, the way it happens now is out of control. Markets should be lead by those who create them, not muppets in smoke filled rooms or why bother to invest? How can a club apply for a number if it isn't given a guide to start with, that surely is what the EN is about and the EN should be set by the manufacturer/designer in fact it shouldn't even be an 'E" number it should be the MRN manufacturer recommended number which should take precedence over incompetent committee bumbling until the product/class gets established.
Now that Hadron having just bunged it through the Peaky/Fuller (I tweaked the formula a bit) EN generator which came out with 1041 at a maximum crew weight of 100kgs. and with the old wooden hull weight it's 1065. That's how quick and simple it can be, and hey if you don't weigh 100 kgs, and you're sailing it at say 85 kgs, then it should be 1023. And even an idiot could manipulate the formula. |
||
![]() |
||
Rupert ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 11 Aug 04 Location: Whitefriars sc Online Status: Offline Posts: 8956 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Just left in the important bits of that post. |
||
Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686
|
||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 1011121314 32> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |