Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
Laser 161752 Tynemouth |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
D-Zero |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 100101102103104 159> |
Author | ||
kneewrecker ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 09 Apr 14 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1586 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 19 Sep 14 at 5:26pm |
|
... and it's hardly in Sailracer's interest to 'protect' all those old classes with highly enviable fleet racing- locally, regionally and nationally; when one of their major outputs is handicap racing!!!
|
||
![]() |
||
iGRF ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 07 Mar 11 Location: Hythe Online Status: Offline Posts: 6499 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I'm sorry, but you've asked for this, that article is just so much bullsh*t, they state where one or other class has stuck its head above the parapet and it's altered with a clear reason for so doing, but without the transparency of logic to that reason. They say boat stats, but there are loads of instances where that simply isn't supported in facts, show us your formula, for say the Punk as an example how have you come to 1010? When you leave the Blaze at 1026 with it's bigger rig its bigger righting moment and its longer waterline length. The 'Gerrymandering' as I ironically put it, is stacked in favour of dragging entrants to a series, presumably to put profit on your bottom line. Case to point, Laser I can't even remember what it is, it's so absurd. You are another commercial interest along side all the others screwing with a system but with an Agenda it's a simple as that please don't insult my intelligence with any suggestion otherwise. Edited by iGRF - 19 Sep 14 at 6:59pm |
||
![]() |
||
Rat Man ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: 19 Sep 14 Location: Midlands Online Status: Offline Posts: 4 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Hi Simon
Just for all your information Nathan did sail his VX1 during the 2013/4 sailjuice winter series - Steve Nicholson and was awarded a PY handicap of 840 which appeared to be roughly correct see this link to the results http://www.northamptonsailingclub.org/results/2014/SNTAssy2014.htm Kind regards The Rat Man |
||
![]() |
||
Guests ![]() Guest Group ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Time for a Dinghy Racing League/Association/Federation to take over running the game from the RYA?
|
||
![]() |
||
iGRF ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 07 Mar 11 Location: Hythe Online Status: Offline Posts: 6499 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I was thinking exactly that, rather than the tail wagging the dog, the dog should have a good go at biting the tail. They (the RYA) are not the body we used to know and love, its a commercial operation these days, staffed with careerists rather than, class type enthusiasts as of days of yore. Maybe it is time for some sort of breakaway operation, would they even notice? They've got so much else going on. |
||
![]() |
||
Guests ![]() Guest Group ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I suspect they'd welcome it, they don't seem to have an appetite for it themselves.
|
||
![]() |
||
blaze720 ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 28 Sep 05 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1635 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Greame
All very well .... so organise your own handicap series and system. Don't really want too ? Then race within a single class. Pointing the finger will not work or elicit needed change - and could just slow up any moves in that direction. It is just paranoid to suggest others have intentionally screwed and skewed the handicap system to nobble you or a particular class. You want these guys to dig in their heels or what ? Yes of course I don't agree with the way it is done either but you will not win any argument with bombast and implied threat. It is really an 'institutional' problem .. 'They' don't see a problem with the current system (institutionalised organisations rarely do ... until ...) So why not come up with a reasoned positive proposal instead of spitting the PN dummy out. Race your chosen craft, whatever you eventually buy, and then argue the case that the available derived PN is c**p afterwards ! Knocking the Blaze (for example) with its many thousands of race results recorded to date might wind me up .. a bit.... We can take it but then just look into the data slightly. The GL modified system runs it at 1032 - not 1026 because that is what the numbers recorded in the highly competitive Sailjuice events last winter produced. It is stable and truly accessible boat for the masses and across the full range of conditons and crew weights - not an uber-lightweight greyhound and that fact has 'number' implications. I don't like Icon numbers myself but again the GL number is already 10 higher than the 'core' PN one ... the system is more sensitive and responsive and the standard of crew ability at their events is high across the board. Don't even think about jumping between classes because of the handicap number - waste of time frankly cos it will and can be changed. Only buy / sail / race what suits you and where you sail ... The problem with the Zero is that Dan sailed the original Punk very very effectively and that is just about all the handicappers can work with so far - unless there are proper assessment on-the-water or evenraw race results en masse that is just about all they have available. Top quartile helms can sail many many points below any handicap number in most classes because the numbers are simply an average or all abilities who race in any particular class. This is why, in the short term at least, you might have to live with a challenging number whatever your choice among the new classes. Chilll ... reason ... race .. reflect .... must be worth a try at least ?! Mike L. Edited by blaze720 - 19 Sep 14 at 8:03pm |
||
![]() |
||
iGRF ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 07 Mar 11 Location: Hythe Online Status: Offline Posts: 6499 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I want a stable, fact based formula to issue a number first.
Then 'these guys' can do what the f**k they like, to suit whatever agenda they like, but there has to be a basis in physical reality to begin with, something to return to, something with logic. New classes get it issued, manufacturers get it applied, no argument. Let them have their silly returns system, but after the fact. The fact must come first. You (Mike) arguing their case just because currently you've found favour within the system and or the conditions which may or may not suit the Blaze or that some crumbs of relief have been proffered to the Icon doesn't help the rest of the world in the greater scheme of things. Peakys number system or the spreadsheet Dan Holman refuses to send me or the system allegedly used by QM, someone, a group of interested individuals need to take a look. Who am I to do it, I have no authority, I'm just a consumer being buggered about. It needs a naval architect, a web designer, a couple of manufacturers reps, a body, say a magazine to promote it and the scheme needs rolling out to clubs as an alternative for adoption. They can then choose, use the RYA PY or the new RDA sphrs (sailboat performance handicap rating system) |
||
![]() |
||
Null ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 11 May 14 Online Status: Offline Posts: 745 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Mike with respect the zero is fairly different to the punk. So picking a handicap off a one off dinghy sailed by a top yachter is a poor solution. Maybe they should handicap the icon taking the mg14 or ns14 national champion data over in aus.... It's just as absurd.
The long and short of it is the current system is not geared up to giving new classes a start point. So we have a couple of options. Race the boat off scratch until you get data needed to make a informed judgement, use a calculation ala dan or peaks formula and adjust as returns allow. The current system of manufacturer recommendations is subject and open to abuse (not saying it is abused but it could be)
|
||
![]() |
||
Guests ![]() Guest Group ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
On to more mundane things, my
|
||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 100101102103104 159> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |