Laser 161752 Tynemouth |
![]() |
Laser 140101 Tynemouth |
![]() |
Laser 28 - Excellent example of this great design Hamble le rice |
![]() |
List classes of boat for sale |
New Laser Rag |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 89101112 18> |
Author | |||
JimC ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 17 May 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6662 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 06 Oct 15 at 6:06am |
||
Do you want to rethink that statement? |
|||
![]() |
|||
Guests ![]() Guest Group ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Chris, I didn't say you should buy a new boat. I didn't even hint at it.
There is a very large disconnect between the various Laser governing bodies (whose infighting is well documented) and the rank and file owner. To this former owner the class appears highly dysfunctional. I have many friends who sail Lasers and would like to think I can make this point with them all feeling insulted. The Laser is a class where the designer launched an identical rival product, the two main builders are fighting in court, the majority of owners do not belong to the CA and racing out of class is endemic. So where is the leadership? Contrary to the number of posts I have on the subject, I do not have particularly strong views on this. I am merely trying to point out that the widespread use of replica sails may not be the harmless means of increasing grassroot participation that it is touted to be. Contrast this to the Solo fleet. The fundamental design is even more outdated and inferior in many respects. However, the builders and CA add huge value through their excellent work. |
|||
![]() |
|||
Rupert ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 11 Aug 04 Location: Whitefriars sc Online Status: Offline Posts: 8956 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
I think I agree it isn't harmless, Peaky, but on balance I think the positives outweigh the negatives, certainly for the pass time of sailing in general, including getting a very popular beach boat out and sailing more often. The Laser appears to have bigger problems as a commercial entity.
|
|||
Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686
|
|||
![]() |
|||
jeffers ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 29 Mar 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 3048 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
The current batch of Laser 'replicas' do not (on the whole) carry the red Laser 'sunburst' as this is a registered part of the TM for us in terms of sailing dinghies. As for readily indentifiable, yes to a point as they do not have the class button or the red 'Laser' sail patch at the tack.
This has been done in South America and China. The South American situation was because there was no licensed builder in the region and a importing a boat is hideously expensive. Apparently the ILCA Tech Committee paid a visit some years ago and were both surprised (and impressed) at the level of details on the 'fake' boats. I also believe there is a boat in the US called a Force 5 which is pretty much a direct copy of a Laser.
|
|||
Paul
---------------------- D-Zero GBR 74 |
|||
![]() |
|||
laser193713 ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 13 May 09 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 889 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
As a former laser sailor at the top end of the national circuit I can confirm that I have never heard anyone question the price of a new sail at that level. Having done several years of national squad sailing not a single person turned up to a training weekend with a replica sail. If the laser rep was saying that he would match the price well then that's great. How on earth can you fault them!? If in the meantime they carry on selling sails at full price and in good numbers then they are doing it right, if they sold them for less than they could get away with then they would be pretty shoddy businessmen! I'm not harping on about any of the things you mention at the end of your post. I don't think the quality is so bad having bought a LOT of sails over the years, I have only had one sail which I wasn't happy with and they replaced it for me without question. I don't for a minute think that they alienate their market and this view is supported by the huge numbers by which they sell their kit! Do Domino's pizza alienate their market by selling a pizza that costs them £2 to make for £16.99? That's the same sort of markup....
|
|||
![]() |
|||
kneewrecker ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 09 Apr 14 Online Status: Offline Posts: 1586 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Peaky you are quite right... I just don't think that many average club laser sailors are either a) that aware of the commercial issues or b) that bothered by them. I doubt 20% of our fleet are even UKLA members and I only know of one guy who bought a new, new boat in our entire fleet of 60+. I'm sure there was a couple of others, maybe youth sailors or something, but it's just not visible.
As Rupert points out, the positives of 'after market ownership' outweigh the negatives. To some extent, I do agree that replicas erode the principles of SMOD and can undermine the very foundations- but there seems enough institutional support in the other direction to offer the checks and balances. If a replica sail gets a boat out of the nettles and some dude gets some enjoyment out of it at an insignificant club racing level, so what- especially if you're only shandycap racing in a lottery fleet? better to have him or her come out to play and increase the numbers imho. I'm no fan of the Laser, but it's a blunt instrument to achieve what I want from sailing - class racing with a low cost of ownership. I personally don't own a replica sail, despite only club sailing these days, but I think having the option there is no bad thing for the guys and girls who I choose to sail against. None of them who do sport replicas are doing so out of any desire to cheat or play the system- they are just sensible and rationale choice for club sailing. My boat's worth about three grand - it would look a bit silly putting a replica on it, but if I was still in my 130*** number from the 90's then, I can't honestly say I wouldn't be tempted... and guess what, I wouldn't be any more or less competitive!!! That is the beauty of Laser club sailing.... As for the new sail - a modest, welcome improvement with lower cost and higher build spec. Long overdue it may be, but let's not worry about that minor detail and just start looking forward to 2016! |
|||
![]() |
|||
laser193713 ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 13 May 09 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 889 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
As for your first point, how pathetic. No, I don't have a spare £10k to spend on a rolex. I don't think I would want one either. I'm certainly not cheap and flashy enough to have a fake, thats worse than not having a rolex at all in my books! But yes, I would say that the reason I make most of my purchases is that the product is good quality and comes with good service. That is why I use apple for all of my home computing requirements, the customer service is exceptional. Likewise with BMW, I don't even have to take my car to be serviced, they come and do it for me, and when they return the car it is beautifully cleaned and even the driver is well presented. Regarding your Hartleys comment, I'm not sure there is much profit in sails and trolleys, speaking as someone in the industry. Any profit there is comes with no effort, but there is very little. Margins mostly come from things you build in house or assemble. I don't think there is much comparison between Hartley's and Laser's business models. Even with all of that profit that laser supposedly make, there is still not a cheaper boat on the market in that sort of size range. I would also go as far as saying that the quality of the laser is pretty good, you don't see many boats the age of some lasers still being competitive in local club racing!
|
|||
![]() |
|||
jeffers ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 29 Mar 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 3048 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Anyone who turned up at a Laser sanctioned event with non legal kit would be told to put it right or be turned away. That is widely known (and only right). Perhaps you should visit a few clubs and look at the sails people are using week in week out. At my local club those using replicas for club racing far out number those using the the official sail. As for your comment about pricing. My point was that if they priced the sail reasonably in the first place there would not be a market for replicas at all because people would be happy to pay to have the correct item. If they can sell them at £200 below RRP and still make a worthwhile profit why not sell them at £150 below the RRP as the norm and offer a £50 discount for a bulk purchase? They were obviously not selling as many legal sails as you seem to think given the proliferation (and acceptance by clubs) of replicas for use in club racing. Were the current sail reasonably priced then I for one would not have voted to allow people to use replicas for class racing (when the class took the vote at my local club some 7 or 8 years or so ago now). The introduction of the new sail will help but our Laser fleet captain is already looking to do a fleet deal for the Mk2 sail. He is looking at replica kit as well as official kit. I think the class/builder has allowed this to go on for far too long now and getting rid of replica parts from the class is going to take a very long time. It is not just sails in the Laser it is other hardware items like spars and foils too.
|
|||
Paul
---------------------- D-Zero GBR 74 |
|||
![]() |
|||
Rupert ![]() Really should get out more ![]() Joined: 11 Aug 04 Location: Whitefriars sc Online Status: Offline Posts: 8956 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
Jeffers, taking a vote was very organised! Pretty sure it just drifted in at most clubs, who were just thankful for the turnout. Funny think is, it was probably the official Laser "push" to get boats out which caused a lot of sales of replica parts as people got old boats up and together.
|
|||
Firefly 2324, Puffin 229, Minisail 3446 Mirror 70686
|
|||
![]() |
|||
jeffers ![]() Really should get out more ![]() ![]() Joined: 29 Mar 04 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 3048 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
The fleet was pretty pro-active then and someone had turned up with one so we decided to put it to the fleet to say what they wanted to do. I was on the sailing committee at the time and a member of the fleet (but not fleet captain). What the fleet wanted to do was to have a framework to work within so we had a crude 'measurement' process and 'approved' several brands of replica that were likely to appear and made it clear that if anyone wanted to use a different one they needed to speak to the fleet captain first. We also said that replica sails should be a direct replacement in terms of cut and number of panels to the official item which ruled out the 'premium' replicas that have since appeared. We also only allow replica sails. Other replica parts were not permitted (although they were used on the club owned Lasers when we had some).
|
|||
Paul
---------------------- D-Zero GBR 74 |
|||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 89101112 18> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |