New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: Footsteps?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Footsteps?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
Author
Black no sugar View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 04 Dec 04
Location: Somewhere between Brighton and Lancing
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3941
Post Options Post Options   Quote Black no sugar Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Footsteps?
    Posted: 05 Jun 07 at 10:59am

There's definitely something fishy going on there: if you look at the same place with Local Live, it comes as the worst piece of aerial photo they can produce. All patched up together with sticky tape.

No footprints and no giant there, but surely something to hide.

We should ask Carshalton to investigate; after all, he works 5 minutes away from there! Big smile

Back to Top
English Dave View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 10 Aug 06
Location: Northern Ireland
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 682
Post Options Post Options   Quote English Dave Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05 Jun 07 at 11:45am
Surely this just confirms that the Earth is a giant football and thet Reigate just happens to be on one of the seams!
English Dave
Ballyholme Yacht Club

(You'd think I'd be better at it by now)

Hurricane 5.9 SX
RS700
Back to Top
mike ellis View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 30 Dec 05
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2339
Post Options Post Options   Quote mike ellis Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05 Jun 07 at 2:57pm

well if it was a giant he actually did have 2 left feet

600 732, will call it Sticks and Stones when i get round to it.
Also International 14, 1318
Back to Top
tack'ho View Drop Down
Really should get out more
Really should get out more
Avatar

Joined: 08 Feb 06
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1100
Post Options Post Options   Quote tack'ho Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05 Jun 07 at 4:00pm

Ohh time to be technical.

The orginal google pic has very litle slant angle (ie it was taken from almost over head)  and judging by the lack increase in slant angle as you move across the image it would have had to be an extremly high flying ac to get it, therefore most likely to be a commercial sat image.  Also the photo has no seams/joins suggesting a single image, at least across portion we are interested in.  All this suggests that there is not a smudge on the lens, gotta be Giants!

Also if you look at the composite picture you'll see that the portion where the Giants footprints are was taken earlier than the google shot, notice the lack of path! 

I might be sailing it, but it's still sh**e!
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.665y
Copyright ©2001-2010 Web Wiz
Change your personal settings, or read our privacy policy